Chassis repairs
Discussion
13 years from new and an unlucky number as my Chim has just failed its MoT due to chassis rot - small hole in front corner. I have had two quotes to replace outriggers etc and one is based on a body lift whereas the other is body off (a few hundred quid more). Is it worth paying more to get the body off, what do I need to ensure is done and what would be a reasonable price for this job?
Thanks for the wide variety of advice; all received gratefully. Conclusion is to spend £1800 + VAT and go for full body off chassis restoration as I intend to keep the car indefinitely and pass it to my son when I can no longer drive it. Work will be done by Steve Darvill at SDAutotec in Great Ouseburn North Yorkshire because it is local and I've known and been able to trust him since I bought my first TVR in 1996
beancounter said:
Conclusion is to spend £1800 + VAT and go for full body off chassis restoration
If you intend to keep it a long time, you won't regret that decision. Also, it's worth considering having it totally stripped (remove engine, gearbox, prop shafts, diff, etc etc) and have the entire chassis shot blasted and powder coated. If the price you've quoted includes all that then it's an extraordinary price; otherwise it's still worth it if you can afford the additional £1500-ish plus VAT. It sounds a lot of money, but the real work is all the dismantling, reassembly and setup.Also, having the body removed properly allows you to see your car in a way that you'll never be able to see it again, and you can post some chassis porn pics here!
Edited to add totally gratuitous naked chassis shot. Phoarrr!

Edited by Dr Mike Oxgreen on Tuesday 12th June 18:55
Pleased to hear the positive news about Steve Darvill and looking forward to visiting him tomorrow to see the body off and make final decision as to extent of the work. Like the doctor's naked chassis pics and must say it is tempting to enable it to be powder coated, but it may stretch the budget too far and begin to interfere with marital harmony!
Just thought you'd like to know that it was a wise choice to go for the full body off because it revealed one hell of a flaky mess - about as bad as Steve has seen! So the engine is now out and we're going for a fairly major restoration (including new cam and clutch for good measure after 45k miles) 
It is your decision entirly but powder coating was the start of most of the chims problems they chip or wear away and the water salt etc. gets under the coating by capilliary action and sits there corroding the metal,it does look good lots of show bikes use it as it does cover a multitude of sins smooting the look of welds etc. but believe me there are better solutions out there now most of which have come from the offshore industries mine has been shotblasted then repaired then blasted again then zinc rich then primer and finally an international g39 i think that was the numberfor the top coat which is easily touched up and very salt and water resistant,but this is just my take but you have definatly done the right thing.
John
John
Engineer1949 said:
powder coating was the start of most of the chims problems
In fairness, it was the poor prep, then leaving the bare chassis out in the rain, and then poor powder coating with no primer that resulted in the problem we know and love today. Done well, it's a reasonably tough and cost-effective solution. Mine was primed with a zinc-based primer before coating; I think most chassis restorers are doing the same.Gassing Station | Chimaera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







.......mind you they were not as bad as some ive seen
