Big Bounce confirmed - maybe?

Big Bounce confirmed - maybe?

Author
Discussion

qube_TA

Original Poster:

8,402 posts

246 months

Tuesday 12th June 2012
quotequote all
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/nov/...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-215...

But if the 'Big Bounce' theory is correct then why would the universe be expanding at an accelerating rate?


mattnunn

14,041 posts

162 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
This paper is pretty old. I've just read through the comments and discussion under the link and have to say this stuck out the most

""The Hindus knew what Penrose claims, 5000 years ago. Called the Breath of Brahma, they knew the universe was an 'eternally expanding-contracting' (sphere) volume. The time of expansion occurs over 4 eras, aeons, or as the Hindi say, 'Yugas', which last billions of years each.

So Roger, read up on the Hindu beliefs in the Vedas and Upanishads. But to confirm their belief scientifically and mathematically is great! We have to get around our linear thinking and understand that the universe is, was, and always will be, a periodic entity whose primary purpose is to express infinity. Every possible permutation of energy must be expressed, and since that is an infinite proposition, we'll be undergoing the process forever, just as we have eternal nothingness to balance out 'yin and yang' or "heaven & hell" - which isn't news, folks!

As JFK said best, "I am a donut" - the torus (perhaps like Haramein's double torus) is forever oscillating. How cool is that?!""

qube_TA

Original Poster:

8,402 posts

246 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
Yeah, the DM article was recent so I added in the other as well.

If there is evidence for a big crunch then it goes against the evidence that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.


Stevenj214

4,941 posts

229 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
Yeah, the DM article was recent so I added in the other as well.

If there is evidence for a big crunch then it goes against the evidence that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.
I thought we don't know why the universe is accelerating though. What if it's accelerating because of something that may run out in the future?

qube_TA

Original Poster:

8,402 posts

246 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
calculated mass of the universe, speed it's expanding is faster than the determined escape velocity therefore it shouldn't slow down and collapse under it's own gravity.

Is how I believe they determined it


MartG

20,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
Dark matter is actually made of invisible bungee cords - when they reach their limit, they'll spring back and cause the universe to collapse again (c:

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Wednesday 13th June 2012
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
As JFK said best, "I am a donut" - the torus (perhaps like Haramein's double torus) is forever oscillating. How cool is that?!""
technically, JFK's Berliner was a jammy doughnut, not a torus

carry on