2004 Accord to a 2000 e39 540i? would ya?
2004 Accord to a 2000 e39 540i? would ya?
Author
Discussion

V8Wagon

Original Poster:

1,707 posts

180 months

Thursday 21st June 2012
quotequote all
I'm really bored of my nice but dull Honda Accord. I have very find memories of my V8 Audi I owned a few years ago and am tempted by an e39 540i that i've spottrd. It's on an 'S' plate so is a bit older than my Honda.

What do you reckon? Would it be an upgrade or a downgrade?

I'm thinking I'd end up pocketing a grand and have a more satisfying car to own and drive.

My Accord is a 2.4 auto so not exactly economical and the 540i is a six speed manual.

Sorry for clunky post....it's my first
ever using my phone rather than the PC.

traffman

2,263 posts

229 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
I would def go for that .

The beemer 540 has a lovely engine decent build quality , although not sure if this engine has the nikasil problem??

Anyway heart to heart i would go for it.

Just mind that your fuel bills will rise.

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

233 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Yes absolutely. Replace the cooling system if it hasn't been already otherwise it will fail soon.

EDLT

15,421 posts

226 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
traffman said:
I would def go for that .

The beemer 540 has a lovely engine decent build quality , although not sure if this engine has the nikasil problem??

Anyway heart to heart i would go for it.

Just mind that your fuel bills will rise.
If the engine is fine now then it won't have a nikasil problem in the future.

405dogvan

5,328 posts

285 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
I think buying a car older than your current car is the cool way to 'upgrade'...

I moved from an 11-year-old 86K car to a 15-year-old 213K car and it's been more reliable, used less fuel and carried more junk-per-tip-trip!!

Newer cars are for people who lack character (or love cupholders).

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

232 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Definitely don't get an e39 if you love cupholders.

Trip computer economy figures from my 540i/6: Round town - 20mpg, average run 24mpg, absolute maximum (a tedious 56mph on the M'way) 38mpg.

forsure

2,172 posts

288 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
S. Gonzales Esq. said:
Definitely don't get an e39 if you love cupholders.
hehe Sound advice; the rear ones will be broken, the front ones (when used) will confuse the climate control.

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

235 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Cupholder issues aside wink

6-speed box and a superb engine biggrin

toon10

6,929 posts

177 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
I went from a 2.4 Accord to a 325i mSport. OK not the biggest leap in terms of performance but the BMW is just a much better car to drive. I'd not say it's a downgrade at all.

dave_s13

13,962 posts

289 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
S. Gonzales Esq. said:
Definitely don't get an e39 if you love cupholders.

Trip computer economy figures from my 540i/6: Round town - 20mpg, average run 24mpg, absolute maximum (a tedious 56mph on the M'way) 38mpg.
Mine was more like 17/22/28 - auto though.

They are a fabulous car but to be honest they don't give you much more pleasure than an equivalent spec 530/528.

I've had a 528 and a 540 btw (tourings) and if I were getting another I'd probably try to fined a nice 530 Sport manual.

billzeebub

3,887 posts

219 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
100%

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

254 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
A 540 manual you say? Yum.

HustleRussell

25,951 posts

180 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
This evening I'm swapping my 2003 Mondeo TDCI for a 1996 525i Se Touring (E34). Can relate totally to the idea of 'upgrading' to an older, simpler car.

dave_s13

13,962 posts

289 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
This evening I'm swapping my 2003 Mondeo TDCI for a 1996 525i Se Touring (E34). Can relate totally to the idea of 'upgrading' to an older, simpler car.
E34 is a "proper" car though, probably better built than the E39.

ajb85

1,124 posts

162 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Nice work finding the manual, hope it's a good un, they're usually like hen's teeth! Have to say, I find the auto 540s a little bit disappointing, not worlds apart from a 530 or 535.

Anyway give it a good try over broken/pot holed roads, the suspension may be getting a little tired in places. Expect a smattering of rust in the usual E39 places. Lovely car though, will sh*t all over the Accord.

T16OLE

2,962 posts

211 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Are you sure its a year 2000 on an "S" plate?

HustleRussell

25,951 posts

180 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
dave_s13 said:
HustleRussell said:
This evening I'm swapping my 2003 Mondeo TDCI for a 1996 525i Se Touring (E34). Can relate totally to the idea of 'upgrading' to an older, simpler car.
E34 is a "proper" car though, probably better built than the E39.
It's got that 'hewn from granite' feel. I could've got an E39 but there's not many good E34's left, also it's a simpler car to work on.

I think the E34's build quality deserves simular acclaim to that of the W124 mercedes, and the engine range is better, and only in the BMW can you get a manual with a hanbrake lever

Waynester

6,483 posts

270 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Definite 'upgrade' on the E39, if it's a good one, your grin should out-widen the Hondas.

Agree on cup holders, especially the rears. Designed for 'display only..use at your peril'

Had my 523 E39 5 years & struggling to replace it for a different like for like value car!

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
No chance.

a_bread

721 posts

205 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
T16OLE said:
Are you sure its a year 2000 on an "S" plate?
+1

Isn't S plate late 98-early 99?

Not that it makes much difference on a car of that age.

One other thing about the 540. Isn't it a different steering system, allegedly less responsive than the systems fitted to the straight-6 cars?