What's your 'worst' bit about the Cerbera Engineering
What's your 'worst' bit about the Cerbera Engineering
Author
Discussion

ukkid35

Original Poster:

6,395 posts

197 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
I'm not going to suggest anything myself just yet...

Omerta

2,013 posts

275 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
You might not consider this engineering, but the lack of adequate corrosion protection of the chassis has to be up there as an issue that has the biggest impact on the largest number of owners.


Dutch_Cerbera

417 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
i am sure some people here wont like it but i just think i should be honest.

already after just 15 years the glue from the rear headrest (right side) is not good anymore.
i mean really, that is just crazy, if you pull the headrest it just comes off...
already after 15 years.... that is for sure the worst bit i have ever had on my Cerbera....

Omerta

2,013 posts

275 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
yes I've always said that discerning customers who appreciate the value of finely engineered headrest glue shouldn't waste their time looking at a TVR - Porsche leads the world in this area.

esso

1,849 posts

241 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Im sure that there is a specialist out there that could rectify this for an extortionate amount of money!!!!!!!!

Tanguero

4,535 posts

225 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Has to be the chassis for me. Inadequate corrosion protection. Running the exhaust so close to the top rails without adequate heat shielding. Making the damn thing wider at the top than the bottom in the engine bay.

BTW The headrest should be screwed together not glued. At least mine are.

caduceus

6,122 posts

290 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
- Zero protection to 1st & 2nd steering coloumn UJs, rfom road grit.
- Poor thermal protection to engine bay cabling and fuel lines.
- Original induction pipes, and sleeves that they clamp onto are woefull.

I did start to fabricate a semi static gaitor arrangement for the steering coloumn UJs and shafts to the rack when I was restoring my ole Cerb, but never finished it.
Did uprate all thermal barriers in engine bay though. Also changed intake pipes to Whirlwind. But was rough sketching a new all alloy intake system.
Well out of the fold now though. One day....

itiejim

1,822 posts

229 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Tie wraps holding the electric window motors in?

Passenger seat only bolted to the fibreglass floor not the chassis?

Dutch_Cerbera

417 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Tanguero said:
BTW The headrest should be screwed together not glued. At least mine are.
laugh

Dutch_Cerbera

417 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Omerta said:
yes I've always said that discerning customers who appreciate the value of finely engineered headrest glue shouldn't waste their time looking at a TVR - Porsche leads the world in this area.
Guess i missed that...

winknerd

Mr Cerbera

5,148 posts

254 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
As my Dear Old Grannie used to say.......

The design and placement of the induction system.
Silencer attachment points actually above the silencer.
Propshaft flange bolts above theb Chassis crossmember.
Having to remove the wheels to adjust/change a front bulb.
Positioning the Oil Filter too close to too much.
The unbelievably cheap, tacky and thoughtles Windscreen Wiper system.
The construction of the Series 2 seats.
The location of the Big Fuse.


and the Flippin' Clutch !

Still, what would I do of a weekend, eh ?
Oh yeah, that's right, have a flippin' life ! driving cloud9

PuffsBack

2,442 posts

249 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Did laugh last week while changing my seat backs and found that the lumber support air bags are held on via masking tape (and I assume friction when the seat backs are on.

Edited by PuffsBack on Thursday 28th June 11:37

aide

2,278 posts

188 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
sticking a gearbox that can only handle a maximum of 300ft/lbs in a car that produces 360ft/lbs anywhere above 2000rpm!

K33LER

216 posts

241 months

Saturday 30th June 2012
quotequote all
Ribbon cables, poor connectors, shocking ability to withstand water, the stupid windscreen wipers which lift at over 80mph and then don't work when the electrical connectors get wet, headlights which are too dim, dodgy boxes with inadequate wiring to hold the current... Mechanically, I'm ok with stuff (apart from the chassis melting) It's the tiresome electrical connections and their ability to break down through normal usage! Trouble is... I bloody love my Cerb!!

ajp70

543 posts

210 months

Saturday 30th June 2012
quotequote all
I can apprieciate the fact that Peter Wheeler wanted to keep costs down but seriously, for an in-house performance engine, he sourced some dodgy quality parts. Early cranks snapping, although rarely heard of now 'cause they must have been done by now. The cam shafts which came out of my car were completely worn away and some lobes were almost round. The AJP could have been more reliable if TVR didn't go to the 'everything for a pound' store for their parts.

I wonder if sales would have been affected if the Cerb was sold at 52k instead of 42k if it were higher quality. My car could still be using it's AJP engine.

Still love 'em though.

gerradiuk

1,669 posts

219 months

Saturday 30th June 2012
quotequote all
Answer is ajp70 no ,according to the purchase invoice for my car in 1997 it was £53k & parts are still made of sugar(starter motors), still I have a sweet tooth & love it !!

ajp70

543 posts

210 months

Saturday 30th June 2012
quotequote all
Were Cerbs cica 53k when new then, because I have always thought they were 42k when new in '97.

Can anyone else please educate the ignorant, ie. me!

Actually, let me ask that on a different thread. Excuse me. Next topic is..

Edited by ajp70 on Saturday 30th June 11:39

cerbera8

205 posts

308 months

Saturday 30th June 2012
quotequote all
4.2's were 41100 as i recall when i bought mine new, plus another 5k for basic extras; aircon i think was 1850, plus pearlescant paint a grand, radio cassette, cd multiplay and speakers. i think delivery was extra. My invoice came to around 45.5K as i recall. 4.5's were about 5k more, speed six same price as 4.2.

Dutch_Cerbera

417 posts

216 months

Sunday 1st July 2012
quotequote all
after some bad bits of the Cerbera, I thought might be interesting to hear that i opened (for the second time ever) the bonnet of my brand new Merc. E Estate and... the whole lever cam off.
that never happened to my Cerb or Tuscan which i have for some years now...

that stupid lever is now hanging there and still did not fix it self... At least a TVR can fix itself

Byker28i

85,540 posts

241 months

Sunday 1st July 2012
quotequote all
cerbera8 said:
4.2's were 41100 as i recall when i bought mine new, plus another 5k for basic extras; aircon i think was 1850, plus pearlescant paint a grand, radio cassette, cd multiplay and speakers. i think delivery was extra. My invoice came to around 45.5K as i recall. 4.5's were about 5k more, speed six same price as 4.2.
See my post in the how much thread for a complete breakdown