Are cars designed around people any more?
Are cars designed around people any more?
Author
Discussion

Twincam16

Original Poster:

27,647 posts

278 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Taking some time out at this weekend's Goodwood Festival of Speed, I thought I'd try out some new cars for size, see which ones I'd consider buying if I was looking for a sensible car.

I'm not a fan of MPVs or SUVs. I'd want a hatch or saloon, between Focus and 5-series sized.

I have quite long legs, I come from a family of fairly tall people and thinking about it most of my friends are above average height for some reason, so my litmus test of whether I'd find a 'practical' car useful is thus:

-Find a comfy driving position in the front.
-Get out.
-Attempt to sit in the seat directly behind 'me'.

I'm staggered by the number of cars supposedly designed around practical, family use that just aren't. As a race we're supposedly getting taller, but it seems cars are increasingly designed around midgets. Put a pair of adults in a Citroen DS4 and it becomes a 2+2. There is genuinely more room in the back of a Lotus Excel.

I've asked several showroom staff about this and all they do is shrug and mutter something about safety and NCAP ratings, but I'm sorry, you can make a car as safe as you goddam well like, but what's the point if you can't fit people in it?

For what it's worth, most cars in the Mondeo/C5/Superb class and above are fine, but they're also enormous. I also find that Skoda manages to make their seats much thinner (but no less comfortable) than the competition so I can comfortably fit in their entire range.

But why are so many cars so poorly packaged these days?!

Krikkit

27,727 posts

201 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Because crumple zones and lashings of equipment mean there's less room to space people out, but we still want cars that will fit on our roads.

If you're tall you need a bigger car. You wouldn't moan about rear legroom in a Fiat 500 would you? And if you struggled to fit into an Elise or MX-5 you might be saddened, but is it the manufacturer's fault? Same thing, just more extreme.

JonathanLegard

5,192 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
I think cars are better packaged now than ever. Ford apparently designed the Focus so that people of up to 6'10" could drive it.

If you're routinely going to be carrying tall adults in the back behind tall adults in the front, you probably need a biggish car. That's always been the case.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

178 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Try a skoda superb estate. Sat in the back of my parents yesterday and I could of gotten a suitcase between my knees and the front seat. That's with their seats in the normal positions

jbi

12,696 posts

224 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
thicker door's and pillars for air bags and other crash safety reinforcements.

Extra soundproofing, larger dash to fit in all the modern gizmo's we require such as climate control systems, multifunction displays, decent sound systems.

So rather than increase the exterior of the car (they do this as well), they impede upon the interior.

LongLiveTazio

2,714 posts

217 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
My new Citigo is very spacious, has loads of kit and yet weighs less than 900kg. It can be done, it's just that styling rules over ergonomics for most companies these days.

Bill

56,717 posts

275 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
JonathanLegard said:
I think cars are better packaged now than ever. Ford apparently designed the Focus so that people of up to 6'10" could drive it.

If you're routinely going to be carrying tall adults in the back behind tall adults in the front, you probably need a biggish car. That's always been the case.
This. People are getting bigger but why would you expect a standard car to be designed to carry numbers of people who are bigger than average?

ajprice

31,666 posts

216 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
LongLiveTazio said:
My new Citigo is very spacious, has loads of kit and yet weighs less than 900kg. It can be done, it's just that styling rules over ergonomics for most companies these days.
yes I'm 6'6" and I sat in a Citigo/Mii/Up at CPOP and there is a lot of space and a decent boot for the size of the car, I didn't try the back seat though hehe

jbi

12,696 posts

224 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
ajprice said:
yes I'm 6'6" and I sat in a Citigo/Mii/Up at CPOP and there is a lot of space and a decent boot for the size of the car, I didn't try the back seat though hehe
is that because you were sitting on it? hehe

J4CKO

45,366 posts

220 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
We have just got a Citroen C1 for a town car and for the kids to learn in, four of us fit in it very well, im six foot and so is one of the kids who was in the car and he was sat behind me, amazin really for such a farting little thing, cock all boot though.

LongLiveTazio

2,714 posts

217 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
ajprice said:
yes I'm 6'6" and I sat in a Citigo/Mii/Up at CPOP and there is a lot of space and a decent boot for the size of the car, I didn't try the back seat though hehe
When I first had a look round it I thought blimey, loads of room inside. Then I opened the boot and was shocked that it was massive compared to an Aygo or even a MINI. Then I test drove it and put a deposit down there and then. It's a superb (a-ha!) car.

forzaminardi

2,298 posts

207 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Are cars designed around people any more?

Yes, but they're all Chinese.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
ajprice said:
LongLiveTazio said:
My new Citigo is very spacious, has loads of kit and yet weighs less than 900kg. It can be done, it's just that styling rules over ergonomics for most companies these days.
yes I'm 6'6" and I sat in a Citigo/Mii/Up at CPOP and there is a lot of space and a decent boot for the size of the car, I didn't try the back seat though hehe

CYMR0

3,940 posts

220 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Taking some time out at this weekend's Goodwood Festival of Speed, I thought I'd try out some new cars for size, see which ones I'd consider buying if I was looking for a sensible car.

I'm not a fan of MPVs or SUVs. I'd want a hatch or saloon, between Focus and 5-series sized.

I have quite long legs, I come from a family of fairly tall people and thinking about it most of my friends are above average height for some reason, so my litmus test of whether I'd find a 'practical' car useful is thus:

-Find a comfy driving position in the front.
-Get out.
-Attempt to sit in the seat directly behind 'me'.

I'm staggered by the number of cars supposedly designed around practical, family use that just aren't. As a race we're supposedly getting taller, but it seems cars are increasingly designed around midgets. Put a pair of adults in a Citroen DS4 and it becomes a 2+2. There is genuinely more room in the back of a Lotus Excel.

I've asked several showroom staff about this and all they do is shrug and mutter something about safety and NCAP ratings, but I'm sorry, you can make a car as safe as you goddam well like, but what's the point if you can't fit people in it?

For what it's worth, most cars in the Mondeo/C5/Superb class and above are fine, but they're also enormous. I also find that Skoda manages to make their seats much thinner (but no less comfortable) than the competition so I can comfortably fit in their entire range.

But why are so many cars so poorly packaged these days?!
I was also at the Festival of Speed and noticed the packaging issues. Even a Ford B-Max seemed compromised on space; Peugeot 208 was no worse but looks a lot less like a miniature Tranist. I am not powerfully built (6'1" and 13 stone) or a company director; I felt really short and skinny compared to a lot of the crowd there though, so I guess all the PH stereotype about size might be true.

otolith

64,258 posts

224 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
We might be getting taller. I would think that the global market for cars has been getting shorter in recent years.

I agree with the comments about it being unreasonable to expect a small-ish car to accomodate two tall people one behind the other, though. That's why cars come in a range of sizes.

ajprice

31,666 posts

216 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
ajprice said:
LongLiveTazio said:
My new Citigo is very spacious, has loads of kit and yet weighs less than 900kg. It can be done, it's just that styling rules over ergonomics for most companies these days.
yes I'm 6'6" and I sat in a Citigo/Mii/Up at CPOP and there is a lot of space and a decent boot for the size of the car, I didn't try the back seat though hehe
Close, but my own car is a Smart

jbi

12,696 posts

224 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all


biggrin

Twincam16

Original Poster:

27,647 posts

278 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
Try a skoda superb estate. Sat in the back of my parents yesterday and I could of gotten a suitcase between my knees and the front seat. That's with their seats in the normal positions
I noticed that. Going on trying cars out for size I reckon there's probably more space in a Superb than there is in an S-class.

Hugo a Gogo

23,417 posts

253 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
JonathanLegard said:
I think cars are better packaged now than ever. Ford apparently designed the Focus so that people of up to 6'10" could drive it.

If you're routinely going to be carrying tall adults in the back behind tall adults in the front, you probably need a biggish car. That's always been the case.
I'm 5'11" - I drive a focus, seat at its lowest setting, a bit over halfway back and my eyeline is right at the top of the wiper sweep, any taller and I wouldn't be able to drive it (I have got stumpy legs and a long body though)

kambites

70,290 posts

241 months

Monday 2nd July 2012
quotequote all
Try an Octavia. Smallish car with a huge amount of interior space.