speed humps, clearance, and liability
speed humps, clearance, and liability
Author
Discussion

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

264 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
Not a big speed hump fan, as I believe they wreck cars, cause increased polution, and still don't educate pedestrians about not walking out into the road. Probably make it worse actually.
However, if you were to buy yourself a nice sports car with low ground clearance and then the council were install humps around where you live such that you can't avoid scraping you car on them, is anyone liable?.
Hello Mr Council, your speed humps have just caused 3k worth of damage to my car. What are you going to do about it?

JMGS4

8,889 posts

293 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
Not a big speed hump fan, as I believe they wreck cars, cause increased polution, and still don't educate pedestrians about not walking out into the road. Probably make it worse actually.
However, if you were to buy yourself a nice sports car with low ground clearance and then the council were install humps around where you live such that you can't avoid scraping you car on them, is anyone liable?.
Hello Mr Council, your speed humps have just caused 3k worth of damage to my car. What are you going to do about it?


IMHO the clearance on a factory standard car must NOT be overreached by road furniture. If the humps do, the erector of the hump is in all cases liable. IMHO there is even EU case law on this, this is why humps are a big nono on the continent!!!
Not a lawyer but read this a time (twelvemonth) ago...

softwaresorcerer

437 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
Sadly, as I've found to my own cost, the councils are astonishingly ignorant on these matters. To make it easy for you, the regulations permit a maximum height above the original road surface of 100mm, with a government recommended maximum of 75mm. Approach and departure ramp angles shouldn't exceed 1 in 20.

In theory, most cars should clear these with no problems, but not all... And the council doesn't care one jot if your sportscar can't quite make it. Again, in theory, anything over the 100mm limit (it's referenced in the Statutory Instrument) is an obstruction in the highway, and should be removed immediately. Getting them to actually do it is another matter entirely.

Case in point - an oversized speed bump within 100 yards of my house is still in place, with the council refusing to remove it. Tricky, since there has been a fatality caused by a car which had just crossed the speed bump, hitting a pedestrian. Number of accidents before the speed bumps were installed? Zero...

With that kind of advanced thinking, there is little hope.

Muncher

12,235 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
[redacted]

pwig

12,001 posts

293 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
You should be able to go over at them at the speed limit without damaging your car otherwise its classed and an artifical way of enforcing an lower limit

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

267 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
Muncher:

D of T Circular Roads 2/92 on Road Humps:

www.tinyurl.com/29xef

Highways (Road Humps) regs 1996:

www.tinyurl.com/2j9mx

DVD

softwaresorcerer

437 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
The Highways (Road Humps) Regulations 1996 are revoked

You need The Highways (Road Humps) Regulations 1999

www.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991025.htm

softwaresorcerer

437 posts

272 months