GT86 Test Drive
Author
Discussion

Rawwr

Original Poster:

22,722 posts

251 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
Just got back from my first drive in the GT86. Overall, quite impressed but stunned that the demo car was an automatic.



Performance: Pretty much as you'd expect for a normally aspirated 2k boxer; it's not going to set the world on fire but in day-to-day driving, it's plenty. If you're the type of person who enjoys destroying other vehicles when moving in a straight line, this really isn't the car for you. The performance in the auto version is also mildly worse than the manual but that's not exactly a huge surprise. The engine isn't as peaky as I thought it might be but if you want to make progress you're going to need to keep it up above 4.5-5krpm to get it to behave the way you want. It pulls nice and cleanly without any surges or flat spots and it's nice that it's clean and smooth up to the limiter as it makes it a bit less of a chore if you're pressing on. The throttle response is also excellent, even in the automatic.

Gearbox: The automatic is a massive, steaming pile of the worst kind of nasty, vile sludge I have ever had the misfortune to encounter. Anybody who specifies a GT86 with an auto 'box should be hung upside-down in a vat of their own leavings until dead. Ok, that was harsh but I really wasn't a fan. As an automatic, it was fine, but it's totally the wrong car for it. Even knocking it into its quasi-manual paddle-shift mode wasn't a significant improvement as the gear changes were somewhat lethargic and just didn't fill me with confidence that it would do what I wanted when I wanted it. I really, really need to get a go in a manual car because I honestly believe that's the only missing piece of the jigsaw.



Handling: Beautiful. Despite the annoying auto 'box, you could at least get it to hold a gear in manual mode, which made sweeping bends and tight corner much more manageable. You can put the car wherever you like without any real concern that it's going to suddenly break away and park itself in a hedge or lamp post. When you do reach the limits of mechanical grip, the break away is very progressive and manageable. In fact, deliberately coaxing it into mischief took a bit of getting used to and there's certainly more of a knack to it than say, a Lotus Elise (lift-off) or an M3 (power).

If you do disable the traction control and other electronic wizardry, it will automatically reenable itself if it thinks you're being a bit of dick. I'm sure there's a way to fully and permanently disable it but I don't think that's a great question to ask a salesman before you take out his pride and joy demo car. Nevertheless, I'd describe its rear-end characteristics as 'chirrupy' rather than 'slidey' and I think that's a decent default position for it.

On the plus side, for the times you don't want to be driving at ten tenths, if the electronics decide they need to intervene they do work well, but again, you'll have to be provoking it to see that as even in the driving rain and on horribly surfaced twisty B-roads, it gave more than enough feedback and carried itself well enough that you could probably get away with never needing them at all. I found that the ABS cuts in far, far too soon, which was quite unexpected but meh, minor gripe.

The steering is noteworthy too. Nicely weighted, perfectly sized wheel and the quickness of the rack is tip-top. Lovely stuff.

Ability to get a slightly rotund and portly friend in the back: Not amazing.



Everything else:
Fit and finish: Pretty decent.
Driving position: Exceptionally good and nicely adjustable.
Quality of materials: Japanese but lovely seats.
Silly stripes on bonnet: Whorish.

In summary: A lot of fun but totally wrecked by that auto box. Desperately want to try a manual.




C2james

4,685 posts

182 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
I do quit like these cars, had a look at one at goodwood and it seemed quite nice. Not sure I'd pay £27k for one which was the one at goodwood.

Raize

1,476 posts

196 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
I never realised it before but the back end of that car looks really badly proportioned.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

185 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all

Interior looks a bit of a mish-mash IMO.

em177

3,141 posts

181 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
Who the hell specced that car with that 'box and those stripes!!

gforceg

3,524 posts

196 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
It might just be me but did the steering wheel feel just a little too vertical? (see last picture)

otolith

62,576 posts

221 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
Shame to drive the automatic, the manual box is lovely.

kambites

69,919 posts

238 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
gforceg said:
It might just be me but did the steering wheel feel just a little too vertical? (see last picture)
Almost vertical is good - the steering column should point right between your shoulders. smile

philmots

4,660 posts

277 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
3k more and you've got an M135i..

or for less a 125i which is pretty good, too.

otolith

62,576 posts

221 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
M135i is to a large extent what this car is about getting away from. No doubt a good car if you like that sort of thing - this is a good car if you don't.

dom180

1,180 posts

281 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
M135i is to a large extent what this car is about getting away from. No doubt a good car if you like that sort of thing - this is a good car if you don't.
Well yes and no - I take your point and agree wrt lightness and sure the 135i is a bit heavier but I think this comparison is going to be both interesting and valid: both are relatively affordable rwd built to entertain. - And how frustrating would it be, to be in an 86, stuck behind say a 125i and unable to pass. Conversely, how satisfying to dispatch slower traffic in a 135i, so as to tackle the twisty bits a little quicker as long as the handling in the 135i is up to entertaining the driver.

It seems as if the oversteer power to grip ratio is better in the 135 than the 86 - i.e. more than enough power to generate easy oversteer on demand whereas the 86 is more limited on the road (with lower entry speeds) compared to its balance on the track.

0a

24,046 posts

211 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
They are not doing themselves any favours with such a stupid looking demo car with an auto box.

I love the general concept though (but I am not hearing anything about buying one from friends though)

Rawwr

Original Poster:

22,722 posts

251 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
If it were my money, I'd go with the GT86 over the 1x5i.

Rawwr

Original Poster:

22,722 posts

251 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
gforceg said:
It might just be me but did the steering wheel feel just a little too vertical? (see last picture)
That's how I have it smile

That's at full extension, as close to me as possible. It's a lovely wheel.

Zed Ed

1,140 posts

200 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
dom180 said:
Well yes and no - I take your point and agree wrt lightness and sure the 135i is a bit heavier but I think this comparison is going to be both interesting and valid: both are relatively affordable rwd built to entertain. - And how frustrating would it be, to be in an 86, stuck behind say a 125i and unable to pass. Conversely, how satisfying to dispatch slower traffic in a 135i, so as to tackle the twisty bits a little quicker as long as the handling in the 135i is up to entertaining the driver.

It seems as if the oversteer power to grip ratio is better in the 135 than the 86 - i.e. more than enough power to generate easy oversteer on demand whereas the 86 is more limited on the road (with lower entry speeds) compared to its balance on the track.
I changed gear in my BRZ and did some A road overtaking

I'll know not to attempt this should I now come across a 1 series

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
They are a lot better in the flesh - I'd only want one with ALL the TRD bits like the white one at Goodwood - unfortunately that added £10k to the price. :-(

jamoor

14,506 posts

232 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
I like the lack of fancy tech in it, no start stop, no electric handbrake, just a relatively normal vehicle.

Bonefish Blues

32,744 posts

240 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
Significant that they made the autobox knob look as much as humanly possible like a manual?

dom180

1,180 posts

281 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
Zed Ed said:
dom180 said:
Well yes and no - I take your point and agree wrt lightness and sure the 135i is a bit heavier but I think this comparison is going to be both interesting and valid: both are relatively affordable rwd built to entertain. - And how frustrating would it be, to be in an 86, stuck behind say a 125i and unable to pass. Conversely, how satisfying to dispatch slower traffic in a 135i, so as to tackle the twisty bits a little quicker as long as the handling in the 135i is up to entertaining the driver.

It seems as if the oversteer power to grip ratio is better in the 135 than the 86 - i.e. more than enough power to generate easy oversteer on demand whereas the 86 is more limited on the road (with lower entry speeds) compared to its balance on the track.
I changed gear in my BRZ and did some A road overtaking

I'll know not to attempt this should I now come across a 1 series
So a large performance gap over the cars you want to overtake, (compared to a deficit) doesn't increase opportunity especially with an increasing tendency for people to not want to be passed....




BBS-LM

3,978 posts

241 months

Saturday 7th July 2012
quotequote all
I'm just hoping this car comes with a supercharger further down the line.