"You cannot take pictures of the shell..."
"You cannot take pictures of the shell..."
Author
Discussion

Cemesis

Original Poster:

771 posts

179 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
This was the announcment over the tannoy at the petrol station. I was trying to take a picture of my fill up so I could update my fuelly account. I went into the shop to pay for the fuel and the conversation went something like this

Me: "Why?"
Him: "You cannot take pictures in the petrol station, no phones must be used, no cameras"
Me: "Why?"
Him: "If you have a problem you can call Head Office"

At this point I couldn't be bothered engaging the guy in a pointless conversation but it took me back about 10 years to an incident I had in America. I was in a shopping centre watching a fountain where the water appeared to jump through the air from pool to pool. I took my camera out and was promptly ordered by a large security guard (who appeared out of no where) that I was not allowed to take a picture of the fountain. I asked why but he just repeated himself. As it was my first trip and for all I knew this guy was going to snatch my camera off me I put it away.

But I wonder just how this draconian view of photography will develop in the future. I know when I was taking photos at netball games at my partners request, I had a couple of people come up to me and say that I was not allowed as I did not have their permission. I have no children but I hear that photography during sports events at schools is not possible as everyone fears that the parents are paedophiles.

The legality of photography in the UK is somewhat different. If you are in a public place then actually I can take your picture and not only do I not need your permission, but you cannot make me delete it. I'm not sure how this will work at the Shell station but there is certainly nothing to stop me taking a photo from within my car of the petrol pump, or of the Shell logo from the pavement. If the warning was due to the use of mobile phones at a petrol station that is of course rediculous too as no mechanical mechanism is intitiated or are signals sent from an iphone when it takes a photo.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

185 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all



Riley Blue

22,568 posts

243 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Cemesis said:
Me: "Why?"
Him: "You cannot take pictures in the petrol station, no phones must be used, no cameras"
Me: "Why?"
Him: "If you have a problem you can call Head Office"
So you whip out your mobile and make the call, you've been given permission.

Nedzilla

2,439 posts

191 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
What a lovely picture!thumbup

Dracoro

8,913 posts

262 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
I'm not sure that it is a public place? I'm guessing the forecourt is private property that customers have access to. Certtainly they couldn't stop you taking pics from the road.

Strawman

6,463 posts

224 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
I was told politely years ago I couldn't take a photo in the food court at Harrods, I think generally commercial premises, like a shop, can have restrictions placed on taking photographs. Not sure how enforceable those restrictions are but probably "terms of use" and different from other public spaces. Similar restrictions at many concerts, where bands have copyright over their image/performance.

GreigM

6,739 posts

266 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
While there is no evidence that your phone will cause any problems whatsoever, it is private land so they are within their rights to forbid you taking pictures, so why not just do as they ask?

Deluded

4,968 posts

208 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
The petrol station is private property though. They can make whatever rules they want. Same as the Mall in America. If they don't want you to take pictures on their site then thats up to them.

As for taking pictures in a public place, this is true to a point. I know of numerous people who have been stopped by police in London for taking pics around landmarks with DSLRs. Funny how tourists get away with it with a compact but get out a decent camera and you are automatically a terrorist. Surely terrorists would be descreet and use a phone camera/compact anyway?

backwards view in this country. It is stupid. I don't really see why any parent would think there child attractive enough to make me want to have a jossle over them anyway. They are the problem, not the other parents trying to take photos of their own children. If you dislike it so much, dont let them take part. Keep them locked in a padded room for the rest of their life so no one can see them, or got forbid, take photos of them.

MattyB_

2,205 posts

274 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all

But...doesn't your receipt have all the information you need anyway?

Oldandslow

2,405 posts

223 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
As the big explosion photo implies you are not supposed to use a phone in a petrol station in case it causes a spark and blows the place up.

I think this was soundly busted by the Mythbusters program but you still see the signs in petrol stations.

Perd Hapley

1,750 posts

190 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
MattyB_ said:
But...doesn't your receipt have all the information you need anyway?
Maybe he was using pay at the pump, which have a functional receipt printer never.

Deluded

4,968 posts

208 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Oldandslow said:
As the big explosion photo implies you are not supposed to use a phone in a petrol station in case it causes a spark and blows the place up.
Yeah that.

But it's ok to drive a car through one which uses explosions and sparks to make it run...

Go figure...

Fox-

13,452 posts

263 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
I once pulled into an Esso station and stood with the pump in the filler neck waiting for it to be authorised.

And waited.

And waited.

The tannoy sounded, but I couldnt make out what they were saying.

I waited.

After what seemed like an age I went into the shop to enquire, where i was rudely told that until I switched my lights off, I couldnt have any fuel. This seemed ridiculous - it was just the angel eye sidelights on the 5 Series. I explained it was just sidelights but she was having none of it. Apparently I could drive off without paying if my lights were on. I held up my keys and pointed out lights on didn't mean engine running, but she re-iterated that she refused to serve me until I turned my lights off.

So I turned my lights off, and then she authorised the pump.

To this day I remain confused about the whole thing. She seemed convinced I was a risk of a drive-off as my lights were on. I take it she didn't realise cars can drive off with lights off, too.

I've not used that station since.

YorkshirePudding

2,129 posts

202 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Cemesis said:
I have no children but I hear that photography during sports events at schools is not possible as everyone fears that the parents are paedophiles.
No problem at my daughters school taking pictures on sports day.


All that jazz

7,632 posts

163 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
MattyB_ said:
But...doesn't your receipt have all the information you need anyway?
Good point is good. yes

Nedzilla

2,439 posts

191 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
I think they just want anything electrical be it phone,camera,ignition car lights or whatever to be completely switched off let alone be used when you are filling up no matter how small the risk might be.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

163 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Cemesis said:
I know when I was taking photos at netball games at my partners request, I had a couple of people come up to me and say that I was not allowed as I did not have their permission. I have no children but I hear that photography during sports events at schools is not possible as everyone fears that the parents are paedophiles.
You need to MTFU and tell them to STFU or remove their kid if they have a problem. While ever people pander to them the (non-)problem will only get worse.

calibrax

4,788 posts

228 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Fox- said:
To this day I remain confused about the whole thing. She seemed convinced I was a risk of a drive-off as my lights were on. I take it she didn't realise cars can drive off with lights off, too.

I've not used that station since.
Probably something to do with the lights being on preventing the number plate showing up on the CCTV pictures. Which wouldn't apply with sidelights, but I expect she had been told not to authorise if the lights were on, not specifically headlights.

Fox-

13,452 posts

263 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
calibrax said:
Probably something to do with the lights being on preventing the number plate showing up on the CCTV pictures. Which wouldn't apply with sidelights, but I expect she had been told not to authorise if the lights were on, not specifically headlights.
Well quite, it wasn't as if I was sat there with the Xenons glaring away!

poing

8,743 posts

217 months

Sunday 8th July 2012
quotequote all
Yet if I go in outside of hours and use the pay at pump none of these rules seem to apply. Curiously nobody has exploded breaking any of these non applied rules during these hours either.

Or do explosions only happen during specific hours when staff are around?