Which vehicle am I best off buying?
Which vehicle am I best off buying?
Author
Discussion

BE57 TOY

Original Poster:

2,628 posts

173 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
Based on 18,000 per year, 90% motorway.

2.0T combined book 36 mpg. £11,000

Or

2.0tdi combined book 55 mpg. £14,000

By the best i mean cheapest over the course of 3 years. Insurance is the same. Not much in the tax. (It's a TT by the way)

otherman

2,265 posts

191 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
and you can't just do a quick sum and work that out?

LeoSayer

7,748 posts

270 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all

Which is faster?


BE57 TOY

Original Poster:

2,628 posts

173 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
LeoSayer said:
Which is faster?
The petrol, but not by very much. I'm more concerned about value for money at this point.

BE57 TOY

Original Poster:

2,628 posts

173 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
otherman said:
and you can't just do a quick sum and work that out?
Why come onto a forum that's meant for conversation just to be a sarcastic twit?

a311

6,330 posts

203 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
BE57 TOY said:
Based on 18,000 per year, 90% motorway.

2.0T combined book 36 mpg. £11,000

Or

2.0tdi combined book 55 mpg. £14,000

By the best i mean cheapest over the course of 3 years. Insurance is the same. Not much in the tax. (It's a TT by the way)
I've no idea what the 'book' figures translate too in the real world so could be worth finding that out too.

18k @ 36mpg @ £1.30 a litre (that's what is is where I am) would set you back 2954.96 a year so x 3=£8864.88

Derv. 18k @ 55 mpg @ 136.9 a litre would set you back 2036.81 * 3=£6110.43

So if my maths is right you're £2754.45 better off in the derv so you're not quite getting the extra purchase price back and that's not factoring in which unit is most reliable/prone to big bills.

BE57 TOY

Original Poster:

2,628 posts

173 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
a311 said:
I've no idea what the 'book' figures translate too in the real world so could be worth finding that out too.

18k @ 36mpg @ £1.30 a litre (that's what is is where I am) would set you back 2954.96 a year so x 3=£8864.88

Derv. 18k @ 55 mpg @ 136.9 a litre would set you back 2036.81 * 3=£6110.43

So if my maths is right you're £2754.45 better off in the derv so you're not quite getting the extra purchase price back and that's not factoring in which unit is most reliable/prone to big bills.
Thanks A311. Very useful. Cheers

a311

6,330 posts

203 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
BE57 TOY said:
Thanks A311. Very useful. Cheers
No worries. Quite interesting as it's the first time I've really compared the figures in a real example myself as on here you normally just hear dervs are only worth it at X miles.... (somewhere north of 20k?) So that's true then.

bencollins4

1,238 posts

232 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
BE57 TOY said:
a311 said:
I've no idea what the 'book' figures translate too in the real world so could be worth finding that out too.

18k @ 36mpg @ £1.30 a litre (that's what is is where I am) would set you back 2954.96 a year so x 3=£8864.88

Derv. 18k @ 55 mpg @ 136.9 a litre would set you back 2036.81 * 3=£6110.43

So if my maths is right you're £2754.45 better off in the derv so you're not quite getting the extra purchase price back and that's not factoring in which unit is most reliable/prone to big bills.
Thanks A311. Very useful. Cheers
....although the diesel may well be worth more when it comes to sell. Bills are a potential on both these engines so for costs alone it has to be diesel. Petrol will certainly be the better drive though.

anonymous-user

80 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
BE57 TOY said:
The petrol, but not by very much. I'm more concerned about value for money at this point.
The 2.0t is a much nicer engine than the diesel. Even nicer still is the newer EA888 2.0tfsi, it's quite a lot quicker than both and torquier. I had the older petrol in a vrs and test drove all three TTs but went for the newer engine, it's worth the extra. Not sure what price they're fetching now.

Schuey M

178 posts

168 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
The petrol would be my choice, nice tuneable engine too. A derv TT is just not as rewarding a drive.

frosted

3,549 posts

203 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
No big bills if 90%of driving is motorway, that's what diesels are built for. I would go derv

McHaggis

58,612 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all


Here you go - I think this works...

artdealer

261 posts

239 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
BE57 TOY said:
Based on 18,000 per year, 90% motorway.

2.0T combined book 36 mpg. £11,000

Or

2.0tdi combined book 55 mpg. £14,000

By the best i mean cheapest over the course of 3 years. Insurance is the same. Not much in the tax. (It's a TT by the way)
This is a reminder that when I was involved with Renault, Grand Espace 2.2 dTi Initiale used to make so much of a premium over the 3.5 petrol there was no benefit if you did under 20000m. There was about a £5000 difference at one point. The 3.5 Petrol Auto was way nicer to drive too.

CYMR0

3,940 posts

226 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
Let's assume that these are four year old cars with 50k each on ...

At seven years and 105k miles, I think we can probably go with £7,000 for the diesel and £5,000 for the petrol in resale values.

So you're about £2k ahead, maybe a little less... tax and insurance are negligible, so it's down to your appetite for costs/risks. With a warranty, on a finanical basis, I'd go diesel although if you think that your mileage might tail off, or if you want to minimise your finanical commitments, going for the petrol wouldn't be a crazy decision.