Boxster 986 (S) brake balance adjustablity ?
Boxster 986 (S) brake balance adjustablity ?
Author
Discussion

chris7676

Original Poster:

2,685 posts

250 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
So as per title - is it possible to adjust it (front/rear) or would it require modifications ? I assume the Boxster racers would have it covered...

Raitzi

640 posts

242 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
That would need installing 2nd master cylinder.

thegoose

8,077 posts

240 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
We're not allowed to alter anything with the braking system other than cooling ducts and pads.

The easy way to alter brake balance is simply to put a restrictor valve in line on the pipe to the rear brakes (assuming they are split front/rear - some cars are diagonal). I did this on a 944 track car I prepared and it worked well - became more balanced rather than having a propensity to lock the rear. The valve was about £70 and just needed a bit of pipe and some unions to fit.

Just looked, it was one of these I used:
http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/Search.do?method=del...

there are similar ones in the same section.

chris7676

Original Poster:

2,685 posts

250 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Intersting stuff, I wasn't aware that the racing rules forbid it (how bizzare).

Regarding the pad route, I thought about it, but it would I would like the same behaviour at various temepratures (so really road and track), not sure how easy it is to achieve.

Btw, the 'problem' is with the rears that could definitely take more (as with most other mid-engined cars I have experienced).

fioran0

2,410 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
only some rules forbid it, it depends on series but certainly the two big places for boxsters to race do.

as cmoose said, pad selection is the easiest way to fine tune front/rear bias. regarding your concerns over different conditions, most pads respond similarly in terms of friction as heat changes across working range so any new feel will be fairly constant both on the street and the track.




spyderman8

1,748 posts

186 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
fioran0 said:
only some rules forbid it, it depends on series but certainly the two big places for boxsters to race do.
We're not allowed to do it either, so between thegoose (PCGB) and me (Logson Group BRSCC) that's both major series covered. We can't even change the pads. On the other hand, in CSCC you can probably do what you like - stick a parachute on the back if it takes yer fancy!


Edited by spyderman8 on Wednesday 1st August 13:05

fioran0

2,410 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Sorry, that should have read don't not do. worst mistype ever!!! I knew what I was saying but my fingers or iphone spellcheck sabotaged me.

PCGB don't, specbox in the US don't and if you guys don't either that's pretty much everywhere I can think where boxsters race in numbers that aren't allowed to use adjustable bias.
That's crazy you can't run free choice on pads in your series.
Marcus, are your pad choices free?


BertBert

21,294 posts

241 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Interestingly, my gut reaction is pretty negative on either trying to do brake bias with choice of different pads front and back or (in the case of trying to move the bias back) by fitting a limiter to the fronts. No real science involved!
Bert

chris7676

Original Poster:

2,685 posts

250 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
BertBert said:
Interestingly, my gut reaction is pretty negative on either trying to do brake bias with choice of different pads front and back or (in the case of trying to move the bias back) by fitting a limiter to the fronts. No real science involved!
Bert
Why ?

fioran0

2,410 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
BertBert said:
Interestingly, my gut reaction is pretty negative on either trying to do brake bias with choice of different pads front and back or (in the case of trying to move the bias back) by fitting a limiter to the fronts. No real science involved!
Bert
Except that's what almost every race team does when allowed/necessary and why there's lots of pad choice.
996 Cups were delivered from the factory with different front and rear pads to add bias to the rear since they had no adjustment.

It's a tried and tested method of fine tuning braking. The key of course is selecting appropriate pads.



Trev450

6,763 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
I know its not pork, but we have experimented with different pads front and rear in my Evo in an attempt to reduce nose dive under braking.

chris7676

Original Poster:

2,685 posts

250 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Trev450 said:
I know its not pork, but we have experimented with different pads front and rear in my Evo in an attempt to reduce nose dive under braking.
Would it not be due to soft front springs (factory Boxsters do the same) ?
Anyway, what are the results ?

Trev450

6,763 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
chris7676 said:
Trev450 said:
I know its not pork, but we have experimented with different pads front and rear in my Evo in an attempt to reduce nose dive under braking.
Would it not be due to soft front springs (factory Boxsters do the same) ?
Anyway, what are the results ?
Quite often yes. In this instance though we were happy with the spring rates and didn't want to upset that so we tried a more aggresive pad in the rear in an attempt to balance the braking efficiency. What it actually achieved is that the car now squats under hard braking instead of diving thereby making it more stable.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Trev450 said:
Quite often yes. In this instance though we were happy with the spring rates and didn't want to upset that so we tried a more aggresive pad in the rear in an attempt to balance the braking efficiency. What it actually achieved is that the car now squats under hard braking instead of diving thereby making it more stable.
That must have one hell of a lot of pro squat geometry on the rear!! Are you sure that's what it actually does under braking?

Trev450

6,763 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
Trev450 said:
Quite often yes. In this instance though we were happy with the spring rates and didn't want to upset that so we tried a more aggresive pad in the rear in an attempt to balance the braking efficiency. What it actually achieved is that the car now squats under hard braking instead of diving thereby making it more stable.
That must have one hell of a lot of pro squat geometry on the rear!! Are you sure that's what it actually does under braking?
I don't have any data to confirm this and can only really say what I'm feeling from the driver's seat, but the car certainly appears to dive less now than it did previously with more road biased pads in the rear.

Johnfrancis

370 posts

180 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Is you Jenson Button?

chris7676

Original Poster:

2,685 posts

250 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
Going back to the pads route - how would you select them? And what should the starting friction difference be ?

NJH

3,021 posts

239 months

Wednesday 1st August 2012
quotequote all
thegoose said:
We're not allowed to alter anything with the braking system other than cooling ducts and pads.
We can run braided hoses but that ain't going to alter brake balance. One could replace a factory proportioning valve with another such as from another car but strictly speaking this isn't allowed by the rules. A lot of the racers stateside for example fit the 928 valve into their 944 race car but ISTR this increases rear bias which IMHE is the exact opposite of what one would want in this car.

Trev450

6,763 posts

202 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Johnfrancis said:
Is you Jenson Button?
Don't be silly - I'm Lewis Hamilton. driving Oh and the correct term is 'are'.

MadMark911

1,755 posts

179 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Trev450 said:
Don't be silly - I'm Lewis Hamilton. driving Oh and the correct term is 'are'.
Pirate? biggrin