It's a Mad World - Sheffield's Worst Driver?
It's a Mad World - Sheffield's Worst Driver?
Author
Discussion

clanger

Original Poster:

1,087 posts

282 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all

madbadger

11,730 posts

268 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Almost certainly Sheffields most criminal driver, but quite likely not the worst driver.

bob1179

14,137 posts

233 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
It is frustrating when you read of persistent criminals such as this. They will be like this for the rest of their lives, are a massive drain on the system and society and the repeated short custodial sentences they receive have no effect on them.

You can't put him in prison for life and you can't put a bullet in the back of his head. What would be the best solution to deal with him?

Forced labour? At least get some use out of him. In the past people like this would be cannon fodder on the front line, press ganged into the Navy or deported to a far off colony.

It's depressing, though thankfully people like this are a small minority.

Some Gump

13,015 posts

210 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Bring back the birch...

hesnotthemessiah

2,121 posts

228 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Well he is from Parsons Cross.

Kentish

15,169 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
"10 months ago he became the carer of his six-year-old son"

Ah and what a role model he is; he's no doubt spawned the next generation of life long criminal.

Sexual Chocolate

1,583 posts

168 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
article says said:
Eyre was also given yet another driving ban, this time lasting for four years.
Like this will bother him.

s3fella

10,524 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
3strikes rule would sort muppets like this


NobleGuy

7,133 posts

239 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
“His son has disabilities..."

Yup, the worst one being his father rolleyes

KevinA4quattro

13,679 posts

304 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
I note his legal representative made a plea for him not to be jailed, but also commented a disqualification will make no difference. So just what is he recommending? Getting off scot-free?

Sharia law would potentially recommend the cutting-off his hands as a punishment. A bit draconian, but,it would solve the problem.

Laurel Green

31,021 posts

256 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Bring back the birch...
It might not be socially acceptable but, would be damned effective! yes

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Bring back the birch...
Almost certainly would not make one jot of difference to his behavior, but that's discounting the satisfaction the rest of us would get out of seeing a scrawny chav get a hiding.

Bring back the birch!

Dave^

7,789 posts

277 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Sorry, but this made me laugh....

Quote said:
A police officer recognised him from the pictures and, when arrested six weeks later, he was still wearing the same top.

Gixer

4,463 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
bob1179 said:
You can't put him in prison for life and you can't put a bullet in the back of his head. What would be the best solution to deal with him?

Forced labour? At least get some use out of him. In the past people like this would be cannon fodder on the front line, press ganged into the Navy or deported to a far off colony.

It's depressing, though thankfully people like this are a small minority.
Why can't you put him in prison for life? Perhaps they should make prison such a hell hole that nobody would ever want to go back

Into the the army for all the expendable jobs I'd say


Lightningman

1,228 posts

206 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
socially acceptable
Extreme bleeding heart liberalism, the rights of the criminal and all the other 'socially acceptable' supreme political correctness brigade is the reason 'we' cannot stop these muppets.

IMHO, if you repeatedly break your social contract with society (by this I mean the basics: don't steal, don't harm, don't kill, etc), that contract becomes null and void. If you want all the safety and benefits a decent society provides, then play by the rules. People make mistakes, that is a given, but blatant repeat offenders should loose their rights. How we deal with people like this numpty, I'm unsure (shame Australia is populated); however, for repeat offending paedophiles, rapists, murderers and other violent crime, I'd happily see lethal injection used. Why should society spend £100,000+ per annum keeping them contained when they have repeatedly shown they do not wish to live by the given rules of that society?


Edited by Lightningman on Thursday 2nd August 12:50

Daston

6,128 posts

227 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
My vote would be a massive walled prison in the middle of a desert, give them some green houses for food and let them get on with it.


Dan_1981

17,974 posts

223 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Phew, thought they'd identified me.

Pixelpeep

8,600 posts

166 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
s3fella said:
3strikes rule would sort muppets like this
yeh, totally agree

Lightningman

1,228 posts

206 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Daston said:
My vote would be a massive walled prison in the middle of a desert, give them some green houses for food and let them get on with it.
That'll end in tears...



rohrl

8,984 posts

169 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Daston said:
My vote would be a massive walled prison in the middle of a desert, give them some green houses for food and let them get on with it.
We used to do this, it's called Australia.