Isofix bases and accidents?

Isofix bases and accidents?

Author
Discussion

Ephraim

Original Poster:

299 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
I've looked all over t'interwebs to try and find the answer to this to no avail. All I've managed to find is some mumsnet speculation, but nothing concrete.

A couple of months ago my RX-8 was rear ended whilst stationary at traffic lights. The other car was doing between 30 and 40 mph. My daughter was in her recaro child seat on its isofix base and it kept her safe throughout. Now I know that I need to replace the seat. But what I'm not sure about is the isofix base.

Anyone got any idea?

y2blade

56,139 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Boobles will be along as shortly, he's your man.

Personally I would replace it along with the seat.
I'm glad your Daughter was uninjured. smile

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
I'd say the base needs to be replaced too. More so than the seat.

At least, that's how I see it, seeing how they work.

LouD86

3,279 posts

154 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Yup, Base is more to structure and safety than the seat, so need to replace that aswell im affraid. Insurance should cover the loss

Ephraim

Original Poster:

299 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Insurance say that it's an uninsured loss and are encouraging me to claim for it via a no win no fee lawyer.

I figured that it would need replacing, and they aren't exactly expensive in the general scheme of things. But it seems entirely undamaged so I thought it worth investigating.

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

204 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
I'd say the base needs to be replaced too. More so than the seat.

At least, that's how I see it, seeing how they work.
Yes this is what I'd do, not cheap but very precious cargo!

smile

eltax91

9,897 posts

207 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Interesting approach from the insurer. When my SiL had a non fault bang with the nipper in the car, the 3rd party insurer said 'we don't take chances with baby seats, replace it like for like and send us the receipt'. They included it in the payout

Trif

748 posts

174 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Ephraim said:
Insurance say that it's an uninsured loss and are encouraging me to claim for it via a no win no fee lawyer.
Is that what your insurer says or the one you are claiming from?

Ephraim

Original Poster:

299 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
Trif said:
Is that what your insurer says or the one you are claiming from?
My insurer. They were handling the total loss section of the claim, but because I'd declined their legal cover add-on they refuse to have anything to do with any of the rest of it. Instead they pointed me to the no-win no-fee people to deal with the child seat and injuries. They did say that they'd pay out £100 uninsured loss payment if I wanted, but given that the child seat and base were about £250 worth, I turned down their offer.

oldcynic

2,166 posts

162 months

Thursday 2nd August 2012
quotequote all
For that speed of impact I'd get the base replaced as well. Assuming you don't trust the accident-damaged seat cut off the straps before taking it to the dump or it'll be on ebay next week. (But hang on to the cover as a spare for the repacement seat!)

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
For peace of mind, replace it. They are designed to protect your child once & it's done that.
There could be internal damage to the base & very small fractures to the plastic that you may not see with the naked eye. Really glad she was ok & good luck.

Ephraim

Original Poster:

299 posts

190 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Thanks all. I shall replace the lot.

I'd really like an isofix seat again, but my daughter is on the cusp of outgrowing the size 1 seats. Not been able to find a 1,2,3 seat with isofix. Anyone know of any?

bungle

1,874 posts

241 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Off the top of my head i think ours is britax ferofix for our 5 yr old.

PanzerCommander

5,026 posts

219 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Go with the no win no fee shysters; claim for the seat and the increase on your insurance over the next few years. But what ever you do, as everybody was uninjured don't let them push you into an injury claim would be my advice smile

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
bungle said:
Off the top of my head i think ours is britax ferofix for our 5 yr old.
It's a Maxi Cosi FeroFix.

bungle

1,874 posts

241 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
boobles said:
It's a Maxi Cosi FeroFix.
oops, thats the one!

Ephraim

Original Poster:

299 posts

190 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Fantastic. I shall look into that one. Thanks for all the help chaps.

PS Boobles: COYR!

Dr_Rick

1,592 posts

249 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
We got a Jane (pronounciation varies as its a Spanish firm with French links) Isofix base and have changed the connecting seat with size of child. Originally had a Strata base and a seat to go with http://www.johnstonprams.co.uk.

There are some other ones on that set of pages that do higher Group levels. Some are multi-Group. I had a look at a Group 1/2/3 seat that did Isofix but wasn't impressed at the level of padding at the Group 1 end; looked a little sparse. So I've got a 'cheaper' (still expensive, but worth it) Group 1 seat, and will go up later when little-un gets big enough.

Incidentally, we have two seat in two cars, one Isofix and one belt-tethered. They both seem to be firmly secured so don't completely discount the belted versions. Personally, I'd go Isofix, but the belted version it secure enough for me.

Dr Rick

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Ephraim said:
Fantastic. I shall look into that one. Thanks for all the help chaps.

PS Boobles: COYR!
thumbup