When are the F1 engines changing?
When are the F1 engines changing?
Author
Discussion

Fantuzzi

Original Poster:

3,297 posts

175 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Is it next season or the one after?

Its v6 twin turbo right, or is it still meant to be 1.6 4 cy, Ive read so many things.

Thank

Composite Guru

2,497 posts

232 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
2014. Not sure about the type though. I would like to say V6 twin turbo.

Mini1275

11,098 posts

211 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
They're changing to 1.6 litre, turbocharged (single) V6s with a rev limit of 15,000 RPM.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Might as well stick a VAG 2.0 diesel in them, to be honest. Pinnacle of motorsport my arse.

hiccy

664 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
Might as well stick a VAG 2.0 diesel in them, to be honest. Pinnacle of motorsport my arse.
What would make them the pinnacle of motorsport?


Are they not going to be hybrids?

AlexS

1,593 posts

261 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
Might as well stick a VAG 2.0 diesel in them, to be honest. Pinnacle of motorsport my arse.
So, what is your pinnacle of motorsport then?

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

263 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
AlexS said:
10 Pence Short said:
Might as well stick a VAG 2.0 diesel in them, to be honest. Pinnacle of motorsport my arse.
So, what is your pinnacle of motorsport then?
Can you not read?! His arse. wink

LiamM45

1,035 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
I think the turbo V6 engines will sound fantastic. Looking forward to seeing them in action

Life Saab Itch

37,069 posts

217 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
olly22n said:
We need large capacity V12's.
With a tow hitch on the back to pull the fuel tanker behind.

Richard-G

1,743 posts

204 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
You can always tell the people who know nothing of f1 when they slag the ol V6 tubby.

it's a good thing they're going to that style of engine, they also have to be started without any outside assistance, which will change things HUGELY.

miln0039

2,013 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
olly22n said:
Life Saab Itch said:
olly22n said:
We need large capacity V12's.
With a tow hitch on the back to pull the fuel tanker behind.
And bigger fuel tanks.

Obv.
Just bring back fueling at pit stops! Was a lot more exciting!

Nick1point9

3,920 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
hiccy said:
What would make them the pinnacle of motorsport?


Are they not going to be hybrids?
They already are hybrids (those that have KERS at least). The rules allow for energy recovery from exhaust gases, i.e. recovery from the turbo shaft. And the rules allow you to motor the turbo to get it up to speed.

10 Pence Short said:
Might as well stick a VAG 2.0 diesel in them, to be honest. Pinnacle of motorsport my arse.
You're right, F1 is all about the engines and by dropping 2 cylinders and 3k rpm the cars practically won't move and will sound like corsas. Oh and the new regulations to limit performance and the way they have written the rules on the use of turbocharging definitely won't lead to significantly better power delivery.

Oh and before you comment on noise, I bet you're one of the people that said the V8s would never live up to the V10s that would never live up to the V12s. If so, what does it matter if it doesn't sound like the V8s, I thought they sounded rubbish anyway?

Crap, I've spilt loads of sarcasm on my keyboard.

RichardD

3,608 posts

274 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Are some sort of inlet restrictions going to be used to control the boost levels that can be achieved?

Fantuzzi

Original Poster:

3,297 posts

175 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Ive never understood peoples love a large capacity, racing is small capacity.

2.0litre v8s thats where its at 1968 style, tipo 33...mmm

Best sounding engine ever, not subjective, fact.


Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Richard-G said:
You can always tell the people who know nothing of f1 when they slag the ol V6 tubby.
Indeed. I remember how pants these sounded like it was only yesterday wink


Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
As for capacity we certainly don’t need to hear the monotonous drone of this engine:-


Hell it only revs to a little over 12k!

RenesisEvo

3,826 posts

248 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
RichardD said:
Are some sort of inlet restrictions going to be used to control the boost levels that can be achieved?
There's a fuel flow rate restriction, so no matter how much air you cram into the engine (i.e boost), you can only put so much fuel in anyway. Probably a whole lot easier to police than trying to set a boot limit.

RichardD

3,608 posts

274 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
There's a fuel flow rate restriction, so no matter how much air you cram into the engine (i.e boost), you can only put so much fuel in anyway. Probably a whole lot easier to police than trying to set a boost limit.
Thanks for that.

With a restriction like that though, wouldn't it be possible to have an engine that produces say 700bhp at 7000rpm (big boost (and torque!!)) and still 700bhp at 14000rpm ? Of course having too much torque for a gearbox would be another issue which I suppose would mean that torque would be moderated to suit...

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

193 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
Hmmm at Brands yesterday we had a demo of 2 early 1990s F1 v8s one was a b193 with a ford HB the other was an earlier Benneton poss a B188again with a ford v8 . Everyone commented on how much better the noise was compared to modern v8s. The demo in the dry was superb.

otolith

68,469 posts

233 months

Friday 3rd August 2012
quotequote all
It's preferable to the turbocharged fours that it looked as if they were going to be lumbered with, but it's essentially a political/commercial act rather than one intended to improve the sport or the spectacle.