Why are there never 0-60mph times quoted for bikes
Why are there never 0-60mph times quoted for bikes
Author
Discussion

Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

309 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
You never see this in the spec whereas it's a staple for comparing sports cars. Just wondering why.

sprinter1050

11,550 posts

258 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
It's too small a number to be recordable smile

anonymous-user

85 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
0-60 are massively inconsistent where bikes are concerned, a lot of it is down to the rider, the surface, tyres etc etc. You can see group tests in magazines where there'll be a 600cc machine half a second quicker to 60 than a big thou' superbike. All superbikes are capable of around 3 seconds dead to 60, some less. Getting one to do it is a different story though, and don't forget they only have one tyre for traction. In gear acceleration figures are a lot more relevant for bikes.

H100S

1,436 posts

204 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
Rat fink got it in one.

John D.

21,165 posts

240 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
H100S said:
Rat fink got it in one.
yes

Largely irrelevant for bikes compared to cars. All bikes are quick off the mark.

Carl-H

947 posts

237 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
Pretty pointless for bikes. A 600 would be very very similar to a 100, and something like an ER-6 is probably only a second or two off the 600. It would all depend on the rider too. Would a light or heavy rider be best is another variable, in a car the lighter the better but on a bike a heavier rider could use his weight to keep the front down.

y2blade

56,322 posts

246 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
Several bikes of various sizes can do 0-60 in slightly under 3 seconds. Including the Honda CBR600RR, Honda Fireblade, Suzuki GSXR1000, Kawasaki ZX-14, BMW S1000RR, etc. etc. etc. That seems to be about the limit because anything faster would just flip the bike over backwards.

As it is, it takes a VERY skilled rider to do it, so you'll find all kinds of 0-60 numbers for these bikes, depending on who was riding it.

Rick448

1,708 posts

255 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
As the replies above really, it is not really a relevant figure for bikes or cars. Surely the 30 - 60* etc figures are more "real world" as this is used to overtake.

  • insert 2 numbers of choice.

Shadow R1

3,845 posts

207 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
0 - 60 is all about the launch, plus wheelbase, as we only need 1st gear (110mph 1st on the R1).
Something like a busa, will be good because it has a long wheelbase, plus low down weight.

1\4 mile is possibly a better benchmark.

Neal H

532 posts

225 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
If bike manufacturers started quoting performance figures the road safety lobby would catch on and demand that anything with more than 30hp must be immediately banned.

uk_vette

3,336 posts

235 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
I would suggest for bikes, a time of 0 to 100 would give a better time separation.

0 to 60 on a bike is the blink of an eye.
Or perhaps a figure from 70 to 140 ?

vette

redstu

2,287 posts

270 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
40-70 in top is the one for me, I'm too lazy to change down!

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

286 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
uk_vette said:
I would suggest for bikes, a time of 0 to 100 would give a better time separation.
Zero to anything is not a sensible statistic for a bike because launching a bike perfectly and consistently is very difficult.

H100S

1,436 posts

204 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
Roll on acceleration in 5 th gear times would be a great indicator of a bikes performance. 5Th gear would cover most bikes then 30 to 70 would be a good range while keeping it legal. I imagine a 1000cc machine would really show a clean pair of heels to a 600cc bike then as 0-60 is a poor indicator of performance on a motorbike.

Would love to see this done with a mix of bikes such as Kawasaki Ninga250 v ER6 v ZX6 V ZX10 V ZZR1400 to see how they varied.

FunkyNige

9,858 posts

306 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
Carl-H said:
Pretty pointless for bikes. A 600 would be very very similar to a 100, and something like an ER-6 is probably only a second or two off the 600. It would all depend on the rider too. Would a light or heavy rider be best is another variable, in a car the lighter the better but on a bike a heavier rider could use his weight to keep the front down.
I agree, as soon as you get up to 600cc the 0-60 times are very similar, even slow bikes like my SV650 (3.6s) are pretty similar to modern superbikes like the R1 (2.9s) so quoting the times is pretty irrelevant when you compare them to the spread you get with modern cars. Once you get to the 1/4 mile times they start spreading out a bit (11.8s and 10.05s)

PaulMoor

3,209 posts

194 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
I think the real reason is 0-60 dosn't sell bikes. We all know the advantages and dissadvantages of diffrent bikes and knowing that a k1300 is 0.3 seconds faster to 60 than a GSXR600 adds nothing to that and tells you nothing about the diffrences in the bikes.

3doorPete

9,991 posts

265 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
H100S said:
Roll on acceleration in 5 th gear times would be a great indicator of a bikes performance. 5Th gear would cover most bikes then 30 to 70 would be a good range while keeping it legal. I imagine a 1000cc machine would really show a clean pair of heels to a 600cc bike then as 0-60 is a poor indicator of performance on a motorbike.

Would love to see this done with a mix of bikes such as Kawasaki Ninga250 v ER6 v ZX6 V ZX10 V ZZR1400 to see how they varied.
I see that measure as pointless. My 600RR outperforms my Ducati 996, but the Ducati would romp a 30-70 in 5th against the 600. On the 600 I would be in 2nd gear for that increment, so saying a 600 is low performance due to a 5th gear roll on test is not true. You'd also find that large capacity nakeds would piss that test as they have a big engine and short gearing.

Bikes already have a decent performance benchmark - quarter mile and magazine test lap times. On the road, the engine capacity and configuration will tell you the rest of the story.

0-60s haven't changed for years. 90s bikes like ZZR1100s had long wheelbases, more weight and short 1st gears, so 0-60 in a similar time to the latest short wheelbase lighter, more powerful, S1000RRs. I once read a test where a stock 99 Hayabusa with about 15 psi in the rear tyre ran a 1.9 sec 0-60.

Unlike 99% of cars 0-60 on a bike is more about rider ability than the bike - Everything 600cc and upwards hits 60 in 1st so you are looking at balancing throttle, wheelie, wheelspin, clutch.


Edited by 3doorPete on Saturday 4th August 17:57

H100S

1,436 posts

204 months

Saturday 4th August 2012
quotequote all
3doorPete said:
H100S said:
Roll on acceleration in 5 th gear times would be a great indicator of a bikes performance. 5Th gear would cover most bikes then 30 to 70 would be a good range while keeping it legal. I imagine a 1000cc machine would really show a clean pair of heels to a 600cc bike then as 0-60 is a poor indicator of performance on a motorbike.

Would love to see this done with a mix of bikes such as Kawasaki Ninga250 v ER6 v ZX6 V ZX10 V ZZR1400 to see how they varied.
I see that measure as pointless. My 600RR outperforms my Ducati 996, but the Ducati would romp a 30-70 in 5th against the 600. On the 600 I would be in 2nd gear for that increment, so saying a 600 is low performance due to a 5th gear roll on test is not true. You'd also find that large capacity nakeds would piss that test as they have a big engine and short gearing.

Bikes already have a decent performance benchmark - quarter mile and magazine test lap times. On the road, the engine capacity and configuration will tell you the rest of the story.

0-60s haven't changed for years. 90s bikes like ZZR1100s had long wheelbases, more weight and short 1st gears, so 0-60 in a similar time to the latest short wheelbase lighter, more powerful, S1000RRs. I once read a test where a stock 99 Hayabusa with about 15 psi in the rear tyre ran a 1.9 sec 0-60.

Unlike 99% of cars 0-60 on a bike is more about rider ability than the bike - Everything 600cc and upwards hits 60 in 1st so you are looking at balancing throttle, wheelie, wheelspin, clutch.


Edited by 3doorPete on Saturday 4th August 17:57
You make some good points however my suggestion is not pointless, as you said a CBR600RR would beat the performance of the Ducati but with the measurement I suggested the Ducati would perform well therefore it would demonstrate performance differently making it valid. Different riders ride differently, have different demands hence many choices of bike out there for us all.

BlackPrince

1,271 posts

200 months

Sunday 5th August 2012
quotequote all
American mags used to do it (every bike every got the same 2.8 time though).

Aprilia claims their RSV4 does it in 2.5 secs in this beautiful advert (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmrifjXStSY&feature=autoplay&list=ULJxm3YQdF8io&playnext=1)




gradderszx10r

374 posts

175 months

Sunday 5th August 2012
quotequote all
There are no 0-60 mph quotes on a bike because they unfortunatly cannot say its 3.2 seconds on a specific bike but if your names Jamie Harris its considerably faster lol