Free 3rd Party Insurance with Road Tax
Free 3rd Party Insurance with Road Tax
Author
Discussion

crostonian

Original Poster:

2,427 posts

195 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Surely this is the sensible thing to do. No more uninsured drivers, would get youth and poorer people back on the roads so more chance to get a job and earn money, no being pulled by the cops because the MID isn't up to date, plus lots of other benefits no doubt. I'm sure they do this in some other countries so why not here. Obviously there would be restrictions for young/new drivers on what cars they could drive 3rd party only but I honestly can't think of any downsides to this.

matthias73

2,900 posts

173 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Oh hello mr smith, the road tax for your corsa will be 17,000 pounds this year. Will you be requiring help with remortaging or will you accept it from behind straight away?

Stedman

7,383 posts

215 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
It's the way the French insurance system works.

maniac0796

1,292 posts

189 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Makes sense to me.

It would also make more sense to me, that you either insure a car, or a driver. Not the retarded system we have of having to insure a driver, on a car.

Raize

1,476 posts

202 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
I don't understand? This only benefits filthy peasants?

Fox-

13,541 posts

269 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
As if it would be 'free'.

No thanks - this only benefits people who have to pay thousands for insurance. Those of us who pay far far less would see average cost rise, surely.

Raize

1,476 posts

202 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Fox- said:
As if it would be 'free'.

No thanks - this only benefits people who have to pay thousands for insurance. Those of us who pay far far less would see average cost rise, surely.
On the other hand, you have better earning abilities than young people who are lucky if they get minimum wage with a degree these days.

Dactub

184 posts

163 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
crostonian said:
Surely this is the sensible thing to do. No more uninsured drivers, would get youth and poorer people back on the roads so more chance to get a job and earn money, no being pulled by the cops because the MID isn't up to date, plus lots of other benefits no doubt. I'm sure they do this in some other countries so why not here. Obviously there would be restrictions for young/new drivers on what cars they could drive 3rd party only but I honestly can't think of any downsides to this.
But how much would the tax be would points accidents come in to the price of the tax it would just mean everyone who pays full price on there own insurance would pay one way or another. If one of the 3rd party tax drives ran in to me and say the claim came to 1000 pound would his tax go up the next year ?.

eltax91

10,626 posts

229 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Raize said:
On the other hand, you have better earning abilities than young people who are lucky if they get minimum wage with a degree these days.
Time to head to China, commie

Fox-

13,541 posts

269 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Raize said:
On the other hand, you have better earning abilities than young people who are lucky if they get minimum wage with a degree these days.
I only finished Uni 3 years ago!

chucklebutty

350 posts

266 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Having finished a distinguished 25 year career as a lecturer?

Fox- said:
I only finished Uni 3 years ago!

Jimmy No Hands

5,065 posts

179 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Australia have a system like that (well, at least Victoria does) although most people still insure anyway.

cuprabob

18,176 posts

237 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Stedman said:
It's the way the French insurance system works.
If there was ever a reason not to have it

Stedman

7,383 posts

215 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
hehe

Devil2575

13,400 posts

211 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Raize said:
On the other hand, you have better earning abilities than young people who are lucky if they get minimum wage with a degree these days.
Only if they did the wrong degree wink

calibrax

4,788 posts

234 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
Raize said:
On the other hand, you have better earning abilities than young people who are lucky if they get minimum wage with a degree these days.
Only if they did the wrong degree wink
Most degrees are worth very little these days, as for good jobs just about every applicant has one. Professional qualifications are where it's at nowadays.

caziques

2,809 posts

191 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
To some extent the New Zealand system.

You can't sue in NZ for injuries, all medical stuff everyone is covered with levies on employment, tax on fuel, charges for using the road (diesel vehicles) etc etc.

Hence car insurance only covers the hardware, and it's not compulsory.

If an uninsured person hits your insured car, you will get paid out and the insurance company tries to get the money out of the other person.

I have to say I find the system better than the UK, - with a decent car get insurance - with some old banger just make sure you don't hit anything expensive, and never any risk of driving uninsured.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

269 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Many countries use this system. However, the British know much better than Johnny Foreigner how to organise things....

IMO separate comprehensive insurance should be made compulsory at the same time.

GoneAnon

1,703 posts

175 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
Having now reached an age where my insurance is cheaper and having got two sons on the road and into their twenties without incident, I really don't want to start subsidising insurance costs for anyone else.

If this compulsory 3rd party insurance does have to come along I'd rather it came out of fuel costs than VED - at least then the risk is partially loaded onto those who USE their car more (disregarding fuel economy) instead of being a flat tax on OWNERSHIP which poses little risk to anyone else and would attract another premium if you wanted to insure your own risk.

RWD cossie wil

4,380 posts

196 months

Friday 10th August 2012
quotequote all
So you open the door for 17/18 year olds to jump into any car they can afford....there would be a lot of smoking holes in hedges & walls.