Looks better in person than in photos - Bentley content
Looks better in person than in photos - Bentley content
Author
Discussion

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

41,030 posts

217 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
For my sins I walk past the Ritz in London on my way to/from work most days. Usually there's a Rolls Royce Phantom parked up there (assume it's the Ritz's based on the number plate).

Last week however I saw one of these instead:



In this very colour. Now I'd seen pics before and thought "yuck!" But how wrong was I, in the flesh it looks flippin gorgeous. cloud9 what amazed me was how tiny and compact it looked. I know it's still a big car but it must play some kind of optical illusion, because it really looks fantastically proportioned, sleek and a lot smaller than it really is. Very very elegant.

Saw it 3 or 4 times in total and once was side by side with one of these:


And I'm sorry to say, but the Bentley easily out shone the Rolls by quite some margin. If I win the Euro Lotto I know who's dealership door I'll be knocking on.

Aizle

12,429 posts

202 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
GTFO

john2443

6,529 posts

238 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
And I'm sorry to say, but the Bentley easily out shone the Rolls by quite some margin. If I win the Euro Lotto I know who's dealership door I'll be knocking on.
Agreed. Whoever styles the front end for Rolls these days should have gone to Specsavers.

The Nur

9,168 posts

212 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
I prefer the rolls tbh

nickbee

423 posts

264 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
I work a stone's throw from the Ritz and I've seen a couple of Mulsannes, they do look much better in the metal. There's something very wrong with the fronts of Rolls Royces, it's like they've put on the headlights from another car as an afterthought.

JayTee94

10,974 posts

184 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
I have also seen one or two, and I agree with 300bhp/tonne. It looks very elegant and very smart compared to the Rolls Royce!

It was quite funny. I saw my first one at a KFC Drive-Thru in Chesterfield, it had to reverse and do multiple moves to get around the corners. laugh

smile

PUA

1,060 posts

186 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
looks cock-eyed!

similar to the Bentley Conti GT, looks average in pics and in the flesh is even more grotesque

BigBen

12,149 posts

257 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
If I win the Euro Lotto I know who's dealership door I'll be knocking on.
Cadillac ?

sday12

5,067 posts

238 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
BigBen said:
300bhp/ton said:
If I win the Euro Lotto I know who's dealership door I'll be knocking on.
Cadillac ?
Chevrolet?

okie592

2,711 posts

194 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
a rolls royce is meant to be understated, i think it does that job well while still being speical

CYMR0

3,940 posts

227 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
BigBen said:
300bhp/ton said:
If I win the Euro Lotto I know who's dealership door I'll be knocking on.
Cadillac ?
But would 300 ever do anything as Euro as the lotto?

blank

3,734 posts

215 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
The massage seats in these are great!

David87

7,000 posts

239 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
Sorry, I'd take the Rolls every time.

AC43

13,509 posts

235 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
nickbee said:
There's something very wrong with the fronts of Rolls Royces, it's like they've put on the headlights from another car as an afterthought.
They're actually from an Austin Allegro.

ATAF.

Chas88

630 posts

193 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
in the flesh it looks flippin gorgeous. cloud9 what amazed me was how tiny and compact it looked. I know it's still a big car but it must play some kind of optical illusion, because it really looks fantastically proportioned, sleek and a lot smaller than it really is. Very very elegant.
I saw one of these near me a while ago, all I can say is tiny and compact looking didn't cross my mind, it was absolutely massive.

I do like them though.



Edited to sort out quoting problem.

Edited by Chas88 on Monday 13th August 23:33

kambites

71,160 posts

248 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
Not seen one in the metal, but even in pictures the only real problem with the looks is the odd extra lights outside the main units.

Fun Bus

17,911 posts

245 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
I'd have the Bentley too. Dark blue with light grey leather please.

JayTee94 said:
It was quite funny. I saw my first one at a KFC Drive-Thru in Chesterfield, it had to reverse and do multiple moves to get around the corners. laugh
I wouldn't even try and get one through a drive through - what a numpty, fair play for trying though.

JREwing

17,547 posts

206 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
Has nobody seen one before!?
Personally, I tend to find they look ok in photos, but slightly boring in person. Well, not boring, but not as handsome as the old Arnage, and somehow with less presence, despite being more obvious.

Wills2

29,039 posts

202 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all

I prefer the looks of the Mulsanne but the interior of the Ghost, not that it matters!

STW2010

5,913 posts

189 months

Monday 13th August 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
For my sins I walk past the Ritz in London on my way to/from work most days. Usually there's a Rolls Royce Phantom parked up there (assume it's the Ritz's based on the number plate).
I haven't looked at the rest of the thread. I'm still stunned that you are actually able to squeeze in a job around your PH posting....

On a serious note, I agree with you. I prefer the Bentley.

I go to Burlington House from time to time, so will look out for the Rolls Royce next time I'm there.