The 60 grand 3.2 carrera
Discussion
These boys have form, & my word it looks lovely, but £60k 
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm


http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm

LaurasOtherHalf said:
These boys have form, & my word it looks lovely, but £60k 
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm

stunning
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm

Porkupine said:
What does impact bumper and pre impact bumper etc mean?
Impact as shown above, pre impact= pre 74 also called long bonnet here-
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3637193.htm
iguana said:
Impact as shown above, pre impact= pre 74 also called long bonnet here-

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3637193.htm
You can't beat the original - lovely lines.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3637193.htm
I'm just going to take the lap top into the bathroom for some errr "me time"....however if you are going to change the number plate, please just buy a normal 1973 or 1974 plate from auto trader for 200 notes rather than one of those dodgy semi personal plates, that usually start as Baz or Daz. That way it fits in with the retro theme.
I've seen that car. It is a thing of beauty. Sam, the guy who does the paint, painted the PU on my 993 earlier this year and did a top notch job. Finish like glass. Similarly Precision did my last service including plugs and a load of other bits. Highly recommended. Best Indy I've used.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
marky911 said:
60k!!
Makes your SC look like a right steal Craig!!
Built by the same people Makes your SC look like a right steal Craig!!

billybob69 said:
At that price you wouldn't drive it. A collector car stunning but sad too.
but plenty of people buy 60 grand cars every day without any hope of retaining their value 
Oh dear oh dear.
Lovely but that has to be up there with the biggest rip off i've ever seen, sorry.
Anybody who buys a mass produced IB for 60k has serious money or mental issues.
Also not even authentic.
Wrong badges/mirrors never had any chrome on a 3.2.
Way too low.
No i'd be in a proper classic like a pre impact at that money.
Lovely but that has to be up there with the biggest rip off i've ever seen, sorry.
Anybody who buys a mass produced IB for 60k has serious money or mental issues.
Also not even authentic.
Wrong badges/mirrors never had any chrome on a 3.2.
Way too low.
No i'd be in a proper classic like a pre impact at that money.
Edited by Crimp a Length! on Monday 20th August 22:11
Not even close to an original RHD 85 car, so why the price tag?
Now if you could get them to put in writing the depreciation free b
ks then I'll sign up today!
PS, the rear end just looks wrong, red lenses with chrome strips & no dangly fogs, quite nice to see a 3.2 with no rear wiper though.
Now if you could get them to put in writing the depreciation free b
ks then I'll sign up today!PS, the rear end just looks wrong, red lenses with chrome strips & no dangly fogs, quite nice to see a 3.2 with no rear wiper though.
It does look very nice and they do look good without the rear tail. We all like different things and personally I would not have gone with the back date chrome look. I think they made a brave move using an early 3.2 as a base and I guess from their blurb a rusty one. I can see where the money has been spent. Is it a lot of money for a brand new old school 911. I don't think so. I'd rather stick 60K into something along the lines of this than a 100K into a 991. I reckon it will sell for what they want. Need to raise the rear ride height a little though as the stance is wrong.
LaurasOtherHalf said:
These boys have form, & my word it looks lovely, but £60k 
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm


http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4160994.htm


Sorry WTF are they thinking about.
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



