New cars that are good to drive?
New cars that are good to drive?
Author
Discussion

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Ok, stay with me a moment.

I know my garage on here doesn't exactly have the best credentials ever, but I'm finding I'm definitely deriving more pleasure from driving older (or cars with older technology) then some of the new vehicles I get to drive. Let's limit this discussion to most 'normal' cars you see on the roads these days.

The best car to drive I've had, is the Rover 45 as shown in my current fleet. This model did get a lot of praise for its chassis, but also, the gearchange is heavy and feels like it is mechanically connected, the steering (although powered) is heavy and has plenty of feel, the brakes are nicely progressive without feeling massively over servo'd.

Are there any run of the mill cars that would feel as 'good' to drive these days? I know it's all subjective, but certainly the BMW 3 Series (current shape) nor the Audi A3 have anywhere near the same driver involvement. Not to mention the other (worse) cars I've driven which include; Astras in various guises, Picassos, Peugeot 307/207, current shape renault megane etc...

Discuss?

kambites

71,207 posts

248 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
In the mainstream no.

Some are very fast, grippy, poised, balanced,... but none are particularly "interactive", as such. Even amongst more specialist cars you're looking at the likes of Caterham or Lotus to produce something decent, IMO.

davepoth

29,395 posts

226 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
GT86/BRZ is pretty much a given, but that was specially designed that way.

Manufacturers focus group things constantly, and the result is that the general public prefer: Grabby brakes (because they feel powerful), Overassisted steering (because it's easier to park), rock hard suspension (because it's sporty), massive wheels and rubber band tyres (because it's sporty), and automated gearboxes (dual clutch included).

with the added issues of EuroNCAP (which adds weight and reduces visibility) and fuel economy, it's no wonder that bread and butter cars are about as exciting as bread and butter.

kambites

71,207 posts

248 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
GT86/BRZ is pretty much a given, but that was specially designed that way.
Whether it succeeded seems to be a matter of certain debate though.

dtrump

2,126 posts

218 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Last year I drove a new A6 avant auto on some city streets then on the motorway. I then did the same journey in a Daewoo Matiz later in the day. Dont ask why...it was a sort of test feedback thing, anyway

The A6 was very comfortable and relaxing but very forgetable also. From what I remember it was a sort of 'zero' experience, I couldnt feel what the car was doing, it felt very numb and overall not that enjoyable.

The Matiz. This was not at all refined and certainly not relaxing. I was quite on edge on the motorway, as when other cars blasted past the shockwave threw the car all over and sometimes out of my lane (it was on an autobahn so sometimes the speed difference was very high).

The A6 was a very capable car but I never got a sense that I knew expactly what the car was doing underneath me. The Matiz, although far less capable, gave me much more feedback and with it being a manual I felt more in control.

It may sound daft but for enjoyment and fun I'd go for the Matiz paperbag

SWoll

22,503 posts

285 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Are there any new cars that are as good to drive as a 1.8 Rover 45?

More involving than a new 3 series?

rofl

You're kidding right?





Aren't you?

StottyZr

6,860 posts

190 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Swoll, she has a point. You'll feel connected to an old Rover because of how mechanical everything is.

Think throttle cable, not throttle position sensor and you might get my point.

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Are there any new cars that are as good to drive as a 1.8 Rover 45?

More involving than a new 3 series?

rofl

You're kidding right?





Aren't you?
Don't quite understand. The 3 series felt isolated and over servo'd. Read my OP again.

scenario8

7,795 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
My MINI was great fun to drive.

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
My MINI was great fun to drive.
D'ya know... I've never driven a MINI. Nor a Mini for that matter. Might have to find someone with one to have a go smile

scenario8

7,795 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
KardioKate said:
scenario8 said:
My MINI was great fun to drive.
D'ya know... I've never driven a MINI. Nor a Mini for that matter. Might have to find someone with one to have a go smile
Coming from "modern" cars you might find a Mini a real shock. Even a modern MINI was a revelation to friends used to their flabby wallowy remote saloons and hatchbacks who "had to" borrow it for a bit. Good honest cheap fun way to crack on with what should be a drudging commute.

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Coming from "modern" cars you might find a Mini a real shock. Even a modern MINI was a revelation to friends used to their flabby wallowy remote saloons and hatchbacks who "had to" borrow it for a bit. Good honest cheap fun way to crack on with what should be a drudging commute.
I've driven plenty of classics so it shouldnt be!

vrooom

3,763 posts

294 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
My old rover is pretty nice and so easy to drive. I wouldnt say involved. Pug 205 gti was best involved car.
My wife hyundai i20 is pretty good, if only they tighten up the steering feel and more power.

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
vrooom said:
My old rover is pretty nice and so easy to drive. I wouldnt say involved. Pug 205 gti was best involved car.
My wife hyundai i20 is pretty good, if only they tighten up the steering feel and more power.
Which rover have you?

vrooom

3,763 posts

294 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
I had rover 214si. The one with 100hp 1.4. Bought as stop gap car. It was very easy to drive at 10/10th

900T-R

20,406 posts

284 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
KardioKate said:
scenario8 said:
My MINI was great fun to drive.
D'ya know... I've never driven a MINI. Nor a Mini for that matter. Might have to find someone with one to have a go smile
Try a bum-basic first-gen MINI (R50) on the boggo 15" wheels with skinny tyres. My 2004 MINI One could barely pull the skin off a rice pudding, but it was fantastic otherwise.

If only my current R56 Cooper S had the same steering and turn-in response... it would be darn near perfect.

anonymous-user

81 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
The title says 'good' but the post says 'involvement' which are two very different things. So which one is it? Involvement != good. A Rover 45 is probably more involving because as you say it's a bit of a chore to drive, but most people don't want that.

jackh707

2,132 posts

183 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Agreed on the MINI, I've got an r50 cooper on 16 inchers, plenty of sidewall, great turn in, very involving for a modern car, delicate brakes, fun at 30mph.

SWoll

22,503 posts

285 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
Swoll, she has a point. You'll feel connected to an old Rover because of how mechanical everything is.

Think throttle cable, not throttle position sensor and you might get my point.
KardioKate said:
SWoll said:
Are there any new cars that are as good to drive as a 1.8 Rover 45?

More involving than a new 3 series?

rofl

You're kidding right?





Aren't you?
Don't quite understand. The 3 series felt isolated and over servo'd. Read my OP again.
Oh, you aren't kidding. OK then.

Whilst I agree with your sentiment I'm afraid that holding up the Rover 45 as some sort of paragon of driver involvement is frankly laughable.

Many people mistake 'heavy' controls for 'feelsome' and this is a perfect example. I've driven plenty of Rover products over the years from 100's to 800's and none of them have been anything other than average in the dynamic stakes.

If you had used an E36 3-Series as an example of how newer cars have become softer and less 'involving' I would have been right with you. Even a MK1 Focus or Pug 205/306 owould have had me agreeing.

But a Rover 45? That's the yard stick?

CedricN

852 posts

172 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Seriously, even though the rover 45 (havent ever driven one) isnt the most exciting car in the world, its not really a big deal for "old" car to have more mechanical feel than a modern 3 series. The 3 series is a bloody good car, mechanicaly involving it isnt.