M3 with mileage discrepancy on National Mileage Register.
M3 with mileage discrepancy on National Mileage Register.
Author
Discussion

bigricho

Original Poster:

167 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Hi Guys,

I've been searching for an E46 M3 for a while now. Two weeks ago a 1 owner 2004 car with 63000 miles on came up, so I jumped on it, with it being listed within half an hour. The car took a week to have the wheels refurbed and as it is up in Bolton and I'm down in Essex they have agreed to drive it down to me. I've only paid a £200 deposit on my credit card, and if it is up to my standards I will have it.

So I HPI'd it with the AA check and everything was fine except,

'Data currently held on the National Mileage Register (NMR) indicates that there may be a mileage discrepancy on this vehicle.'

With the following discrepancy;

Date recorded Recorded by Mileage reading Total
16-Jun-2008 Manufacturer 31,400 31,400
17-Jul-2008 Manufacturer 9 9
12-Jan-2009 Manufacturer 9 9
15-Jun-2009 Manufacturer 40,300 40,300
17-Aug-2012 NMR 63,000 63,000


I rang the dealer up and asked him to provide me with the service history, dates, mileages, locations etc which he duly did and everything added up if you took out those very strange '9's' from the table. I then told him about this discrepancy and he put it down to a clerical error. Can anyone shed any light on this? and does anyone have any opinions on what steps I should take next?

It is a one owner car which leads me to ask the question why would he have it clocked 4 years before selling the car?


Thanks in advance,

Rich

em177

3,148 posts

191 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
bigricho said:
It is a one owner car which leads me to ask the question why would he have it clocked 4 years before selling the car?


Easier to hide?

chongwong

1,045 posts

174 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
It sounds to me like a genuine mistake tbh. Like you said, clocking a car 4years before a sale would be a tad odd. So long as the vehicle is in good condition when you look it over will you Really mind?

Might at least give you a haggling pointsmile

muckymotor

2,461 posts

248 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Try checking the MOT history online and see what that brings up http://motinfo.direct.gov.uk/internet/jsp/ECHID-In...

CoolHands

22,981 posts

222 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
yeah I agree re: check the mot history.

confused_buyer

7,120 posts

208 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
The records are clearly wrong. No one clocks a car to 9 miles unless replacing the speedo and then no one does 40,000 miles in a M3 in 6 months.

The NMR (which sounds all official but is really just a commercial company) just collates data based on user input - it doesn't even record MOT mileages - and is a useful tool but by no means gospel.

If everything else stacks up the car is almost certainly fine.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

175 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
It looks like the mileage just wasn't recorded those two times, so dummy data was entered. I don't think clocking has anything to do with this discrepancy.

Engineer1

10,486 posts

236 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
The mileage will most likely be due ro a system that won't accept a gap so the operator has input a number.

Clinton Baptiste

657 posts

209 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
I bought a Mondeo with 62000 miles on last month. When i checked the mileage with HPI it said...

61000 miles recorded on 23 Jun 2012
280000 miles recorded on 22 Apr 2007

When i checked the MOT from July 2007 the mileage was 28077 so some numpty has put an extra zero on by mistake. I checked all the MOT's on the link above that somebody posted and they all came back fine and correct. Ive had to scan my Mot Cert for 2007 to HPI mileage dept and they are going to correct it.

kentmotorcompany

2,471 posts

237 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
NMR is a nightmare, and not worth anything to the buyer and just a PITA for the seller.

I've known cases where someone checking out a possible PX whilst running a HPI has rounded up the mileage from 39xxx to 40000, and three days later the car comes in and admin enter the exact mileage of 39xxx.

Now because the mileage has technically gone backwards chronologically by a few miles this "discrepancy" will stay on the HPI until someone spends an age on the phone and in writing sorting it out. Now most times its pretty obvious that nothing is wrong, but it enough to worry some customers away from a car.

MOT history check, along with service history is much more reliable, relevant, and supersedes anything the NMR will tell you.

In this case its a one owner car, so even over the internet its almost certainly 100% fine.

Clinton Baptiste

657 posts

209 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
kentmotorcompany said:
NMR is a nightmare, and not worth anything to the buyer and just a PITA for the seller.

I've known cases where someone checking out a possible PX whilst running a HPI has rounded up the mileage from 39xxx to 40000, and three days later the car comes in and admin enter the exact mileage of 39xxx.

Now because the mileage has technically gone backwards chronologically by a few miles this "discrepancy" will stay on the HPI until someone spends an age on the phone and in writing sorting it out. Now most times its pretty obvious that nothing is wrong, but it enough to worry some customers away from a car.

MOT history check, along with service history is much more reliable, relevant, and supersedes anything the NMR will tell you.

In this case its a one owner car, so even over the internet its almost certainly 100% fine.
Coudn't have put it better myself

playalistic

2,270 posts

191 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
My experience with NMR is it is a load of bks. Your mileage may vary (see what I did there?)

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

235 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Looks like some lazy salesman just plonked 9 as the mileage. Could've been to spite the driver or just through sheer idleness.

Can be confirmed via MOT's (VOSA website) if your worried or walk away if it botheres you too much.

Awesome cars E46 M3's, the S54 engine is a masterpiece and all now for reasonable money.

bigricho

Original Poster:

167 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Guys, Luckily the car is full BMW Service History. So I got in contact with the service department of the dealer that took care of the car , they talked my through all of its services and the MOTs the car has had done, everything stacks up.

I will do an MOT history check once i get hold of the V5. But i feel much more reassured right now.

Rich