M3 CSL or 996 Turbo
M3 CSL or 996 Turbo
Author
Discussion

shantybeater

Original Poster:

1,202 posts

195 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
Hi all,

I've asked the same question in the Porsche section but would like a bit of advice,

I'm putting my S54 engined Z3M up for sale, I love the car to bits but I'm looking for a more focused weekend toy and to be perhaps my final car change for some time (before kids and marriage come along)

I'm no race driver but the zed is just too good at the day to day stuff so I'm looking for something worthy to sit in the garage 90% of the time. I'm also looking for a car to hang onto for a while (maybe a bit of a project)

My requirements - I don't require rear seats, infact i'd rather not have them at all. My budget will be around 20-25k and the two cars which fit the bill are the CSL and the turbo. I also like to have something you don't see everyday

I'm swaying towards the turbo at the moment because I like to tinker and love straight line pace. I also miss turbo power delivery

What's everyone's view point on the two cars. Is the turbo enough of an event for the weekend only? Does the CSL look special enough? Normal e46 m3's are ten to the dozen which has always put me off


Edited by shantybeater on Monday 3rd September 11:21

joscal

2,580 posts

226 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
I've had both and for me it would have to be the CSL. The only car I have regretted selling, not great as a daily but fantastic track car.

0836whimper

982 posts

224 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
I think the power delivery, gear change, drive-train and noise are so different, a test-drive of both will confirm your favourite.

habanero

74 posts

190 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
As the owner of a 996 Turbo for the last two years I would suggest you go for the CSL. As a trackday weapon the CSL is much better suited.

I was at Bedford Autodrome on the 24th of last month and as devastatingly quick as my car is I feel a proper track car would be more fun.

Test drive both but don't be surprised if you get sucked in by the obscene grunt of that twin turbo flat six.

shantybeater

Original Poster:

1,202 posts

195 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies, I've test driven the porsche and the power delivery was savage compared to my ZM. I'll have to give the CSL a go (if I can track one down). I assume the SMG boxes are fairly solid? For me i've only ever known of a manual so that in itself could be a deal breaker

I have to be honest and point out I have no track-day experience but plan to change that in the near future, all i've done so far is ferrari experience days at silverstone so you can imagine how limited my skills are at present.

johnnywb

1,631 posts

234 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
To be honest, they're two very different cars. The CSL is more akin to the GT3. It's a semi-stripped out track weapon. The Turbo is a very very fast, nice comfy road car.

I have a CSL and used to drive it day to day. It's an event to drive it, but using it a lot became tiring. It's the sort of car that wants to be driven at 8 or 9 tenths all the time. Whilst i can do quiet and placid in traffic very well, it gets quite frustrating. I wouldn't worry about the gearbox. I had similar thoughts, but the SMG suits the car perfectly.

I've never owned a 996 Turbo but have ridden in one a lot. The power delivery is savage and it's a great car, but very different to the CSL.

Where are you based? If you post on the CSLregister, i'm sure someone would be local and happy to take you out in their car for a spin?

shantybeater

Original Poster:

1,202 posts

195 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
Hi Jonny, that's a nice idea. I'm in Poole(Dorset), I'll join up and ask the question. I can't say I've ever seen one nearby!

johnnywb

1,631 posts

234 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
shantybeater said:
Hi Jonny, that's a nice idea. I'm in Poole(Dorset), I'll join up and ask the question. I can't say I've ever seen one nearby!
I'm sure you'll find someone down that way, i think my car spend a long while down there!

M3Charlie

556 posts

184 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
Shanty there is a guy that comes to the Southcoast pub club who owns one. I'm sure he would take u for a spin.

AdamC1983

621 posts

178 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
No experience of driving either but if i had the choice id go for the csl in grey everytime. Wasnt there only a few hundred built? How many 996 turbos? Sureley the rarer car is also going to hold value better? Plus they look mean as hell compared to standard m3s with those csl wheels and huge racing brakes, and the awesome carbon roof and bootlid if im not mistaken? And that front bumper with the single intake on one side for the airbox is immense. The ultimate luxury track car!
Everyones got a porsche, go for the csl.

shim

2,051 posts

234 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
we had a CSL meet last Friday at Donny and as a track weapon the CSL is far superior to the 996 turbo even with x50 or a/m boost. no comparison in driving feedback or enjoyment.

however the CSL hasnt got the straight line kick of the 996turbo especially with some extra bhp

Leins

10,324 posts

174 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
I'm a big fan of Porsche stuff, but I wouldn't swap the CSL for a 996 Turbo. I would for a 964/993 RS or one of the GT2/3s though, but they're all a bit pricier

SMGII is all part of the experience too, and I love it

Mach

526 posts

251 months

Monday 3rd September 2012
quotequote all
On our annual Euro trip last year we had a Nissan GTR, 2 996 Turbos (one of them mine) and a CSL.

The CSL stole the show for me. On the twisy mountain climbs where the Porsches couldn't really use the extra grunt the CSL was epic, and that noise! It became the default camera car. It just had so much character and honestly made my 996 Turbo feel bland.

It's nagged at me all year and as a result I shall be doing this tear's trip in an E46 M3 SMG, admittedly not a CSL but I found a 23,000 mile peach which I couldn't resist. I'm 100% happy with the choice, the added bonus being the build quality is simply in a different league to the 996.

So I would say CSL, definitely.

Oh, if anyone's interested the GTR crapped on everything smile

Pig Skill

1,368 posts

229 months

Tuesday 4th September 2012
quotequote all
Plus CSL prices are going north so you could keep it a few years and at the very least get your money back.

The 996 Turbo dosen't carry that desirability tag like the CSL

The CSL is the one to impress the wife as you are buying with the future in mind so extra points awarded there wink

MMT

598 posts

212 months

Tuesday 4th September 2012
quotequote all
As an M3 owner and as much as I like the csl it would still be the turbo for me. I was at a Donington track day a couple of months ago when there were a few M3's and CSL's and two 996 turbos. The CSL's looked and sounded lovely, but to be fair most of the talk and focus was on the two turbos. They were in a different league.
Also can somebody clarify a point made earlier about CSL's having massive racing brakes? I thought they had slightly bigger discs, the same single pot calliper and really need upgrading if going on track.

0836whimper

982 posts

224 months

Tuesday 4th September 2012
quotequote all
Pig Skill said:
The CSL is the one to impress the wife as you are buying with the future in mind so extra points awarded there wink
I thought that, didn't really work though. She struggles to get in and out of the seats and it is 'too noisy and has a rubbish stereo'. And I have to avoid anything north of 5000 revs most of the time.

I still claim it's a practical family car though.

biggrin

scarebus

858 posts

197 months

Tuesday 4th September 2012
quotequote all
Shanty, both cars are pretty amazing, but judging by your taste in cars I think you will fall out of love with the 996 turbo quite quickly.
Yes it's fast but I feel that's about it. It is not exactly rare, sound special, look special, and 911's dont need 4wd (they already have great traction and it makes them heavy). I have tracked a 996t and found it underwhelming, very soft and slightly flabby.

If you had a 996t you will always lust after a 997t, however if you could stretch to a 996 gt2 you would have an amazing, rare, depreciation proof, super fast car that you would want to keep forever. Oh and it has 2 seats as you wish...

I like the csl, but like you said the M3s are a little common sight and only takes a petrol head to know the difference between the two. As I have read before you don't really track your cars, so will a csl tick the boxes for you? A similar budget could get you into a E90/92 M3 (very yummy)...

Food for thought, have fun searching

Leins

10,324 posts

174 months

Tuesday 4th September 2012
quotequote all
I don't track my CSL. It was bought for the noise, early Sunday morning mountain drives and the odd special road trip, like the Isle of Man earlier in the summer. For those purposes it is quite brilliant

shantybeater

Original Poster:

1,202 posts

195 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for all the input, greatly appreciated.

Charlie - thanks for letting me know, i'll try and attend the next one smile

ady702

376 posts

173 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
MMT said:
Also can somebody clarify a point made earlier about CSL's having massive racing brakes? I thought they had slightly bigger discs, the same single pot calliper and really need upgrading if going on track.
Most if not everyone upgrade these if they are tracking the car, mostly AP items. Thats pretty much all it needs since the engine is nearly maxed out already.

996TT you will start to modify more.....Exhaust, X50 turbos, remap..... if you dont buy a X50 in the first place, lol I sold my M Coupe in search for one but I didnt like the dated interior or the front end much and a GT2 bumper is nearly £2k! so maybe 997 for me instead smile


Edited by ady702 on Wednesday 5th September 18:16