Panda or Fiesta?
Author
Discussion

TSCfree

Original Poster:

1,681 posts

258 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Cheap commuting car needed....
£2500
Where would your money go and why?

Preferable engine size 1.2, 40+ MPG, post 05 plate, petrol, any other alternatives for a car that will be kept until it is scrapped?

Just scrapped my T plate fiesta due to rust after 8 years, would the fiat hold up as well?

simo2k2000

78 posts

167 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Fiesta 1.25 is nippy for what it is and cheap. Only Panda I like is the 100HP

TSCfree

Original Poster:

1,681 posts

258 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
simo2k2000 said:
Fiesta 1.25 is nippy for what it is and cheap. Only Panda I like is the 100HP
Yeah the panda does look old man ish.... then again I do run a forester sleep
100HP is above the budget unfortunately but does look better

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

209 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Panda. All day, every day. Owned both, the Panda just has something about it.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

282 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
simo2k2000 said:
is nippy for what it is
Surely one of the most pointless expressions ever? What it is, is a Fiesta so it's about as nippy as a 1.25 Fiesta. silly

That said I'd probably go for the Fiesta since the OP will be looking at the sluggish 1.1/1.2 8v engines in the Panda for his budget. I do like the Panda though, and it should be a little more economical if you are desperate for every last mpg.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

219 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Pandas have an unpretentious charm that is missing from most of it's competitors. I've got a Multijet and it's great. It won't rust at all - mine's done 70k and is immaculate underneath.

TSCfree

Original Poster:

1,681 posts

258 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Having a look at a panda tomorrow, the interior pics look terrible, not that the fiesta was anything to write home about. Any weak points?

simo2k2000

78 posts

167 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Surely one of the most pointless expressions ever? What it is, is a Fiesta so it's about as nippy as a 1.25 Fiesta. silly

That said I'd probably go for the Fiesta since the OP will be looking at the sluggish 1.1/1.2 8v engines in the Panda for his budget. I do like the Panda though, and it should be a little more economical if you are desperate for every last mpg.
As in most 1.2s are around 60bhp whilst the Fiesta is 75bhp so 25% more powerful than the majority for the same(ish) engine size

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

209 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
TSCfree said:
Having a look at a panda tomorrow, the interior pics look terrible, not that the fiesta was anything to write home about. Any weak points?
No. Seriously, no, it's a simple thing that doesn't break, if it does it'll be cheap and easy to fix. At your budget, you'll be looking at a pre-facelift model, I believe the only material difference is the wing mirrors; the ones on the car you'll be looking at will be tiny.

As stated above, the Panda is completely unpretentious, it makes no bones about being completely uncool and as such is much cooler than any Fiesta.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

219 months

Friday 7th September 2012
quotequote all
^^^ What he said.

Durable, tough interiors that clean easily. Pandas were cheaper than Fiestas when new , but the equipment levels are still fine. Everything you need ,in fact.

TSCfree

Original Poster:

1,681 posts

258 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Had a good look over the 1.2 panda today and was impressed, that impressed I've bought it!. Considering its 7 years old it looks in very good condition underneath for 46000 miles. It drove well enough, gearbox was precise and the interior wasn't as bad as the photo suggested. Seats were comfier than the fiesta. Cheap, hassle free motoring....I hope!

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

209 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
TSCfree said:
Had a good look over the 1.2 panda today and was impressed, that impressed I've bought it!. Considering its 7 years old it looks in very good condition underneath for 46000 miles. It drove well enough, gearbox was precise and the interior wasn't as bad as the photo suggested. Seats were comfier than the fiesta. Cheap, hassle free motoring....I hope!
Good purchase, I loved mine and only got shot of it because kid number 2 was coming. Bags of character, great little car. We regularly done camping trips to the highlands, it swallowed all luggage with ease, surprisingly big inside.

biggrin

Rollcage

11,345 posts

219 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Good purchase, I loved mine and only got shot of it because kid number 2 was coming. Bags of character, great little car. We regularly done camping trips to the highlands, it swallowed all luggage with ease, surprisingly big inside.

biggrin
Did the same in mine a few weeks ago - 1800 miles in a week, with 72mpg out of the tank around the Highlands!




TSCfree

Original Poster:

1,681 posts

258 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Love it thumbup It is almost Tardis like. When I popped the bonnet I couldn't believe how much space there was, looks an easy car to spanner on if needed.

joewilliams

2,004 posts

228 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Good purchase, I loved mine and only got shot of it because kid number 2 was coming. Bags of character, great little car. We regularly done camping trips to the highlands, it swallowed all luggage with ease, surprisingly big inside.

biggrin
Wuss.

We get all four of us AND all my wife's crap in ours.

We often use it in preference to my mondeo as it's easier to reach the kids when needed.

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

209 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
joewilliams said:
Wuss.

We get all four of us AND all my wife's crap in ours.

We often use it in preference to my mondeo as it's easier to reach the kids when needed.
Hey, if you can fit a 4-man tent, a double buggy, clothing and equipment for 2 adults, 1 toddler and one baby for a long weekend into the boot of a Panda, please, I'd love to see photos. We coped just fine when it was just the three of us and the rear seat could be put down but a second baby seat and a larger buggy did it for the Panda. It put up a glorious fight but sadly it was never going to win.

M Powered

349 posts

236 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Hey, if you can fit a 4-man tent, a double buggy, clothing and equipment for 2 adults, 1 toddler and one baby for a long weekend into the boot of a Panda, please, I'd love to see photos. ...
This. It might be tempting downsize from the XC70.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

219 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
In fairness, hes probably not suggesting they all go camping in it as well hehe Below was just two people for the trip above! Not much room left!




nottyash

4,671 posts

222 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Strange preferences.
I could choose loadssss of other cars older than 2005, that cost £1500 and dont achieve 40mpg, but are better in every other area, and probably cheaper taking into acount original purchase costs.
But....back to your question, Yes Fiesta or Panda.sleep

joewilliams

2,004 posts

228 months

Saturday 8th September 2012
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
Hey, if you can fit a 4-man tent, a double buggy, clothing and equipment for 2 adults, 1 toddler and one baby for a long weekend into the boot of a Panda, please, I'd love to see photos.
Easy.

Buggy replaced by two slings. Rear facing car seat in front, load of soft bags in footwell. Tent in boot, more bags on top.

Alternatively, double buggy fits in boot. Soft bags stuffed around it and in footwells. Tent on roof rack.

I love the space in my car, but the panda is a sodding tardis.