Which lens next?
Author
Discussion

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Sunday 9th September 2012
quotequote all
I bought my Nikon D7000 with a kit lens, which is a AF-S Nikkor 18-105mm 1:3.5-5.6 G ED.

I've since bought a AF-S Nikkor 12-24mm 1:4 G ED and a AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4.5-5.6 G ED

Now tell me if I'm imagining it, but it feels to me like the two I've bought are of a superior quality to the original kit lens. The images seem sharper and the lenses are both heavier (I don't know if that's a good indication?)

So my question is, are they, and if so what would you suggest would be a good lens to replace the kit lens with to get a similar level of quality to my new ones, and effectively plug the gap between them?

Edited by Ari on Sunday 9th September 14:54

GetCarter

31,236 posts

308 months

Sunday 9th September 2012
quotequote all
AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8G DX IF-ED

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Ouch! Better get saving! biggrin

AndWhyNot

2,359 posts

228 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Get's suggested a great lens but if you're planning a move to FX format it won't deliver as well if you take it with you. The AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 is the FX equiv of the lens suggested above- you'll need to save harder.

Or look at getting a couple of primes which, although you'll lose out in zoom flexibility, give you light-gathering and DoF options.

You could pick up used copies of the AF-D 35mm f/2 *and* the AF-S 50mm f/1.4 and still have change from £500.

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
I've got the 50mm prime already, so that's not a bad idea. I do like the flexibility of a zoom though I must admit.

However I would like to move to FX at some stage (it won't be for a good while yet) so that is also a consideration.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8G DX IF-ED
If your not rich enough for this one get a sigma 18-50f2.8 OS, damned near as good as the canon 17-55f2.8IS and a lot cheaper than the nikon.

Only downside is its not FTM focus.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
There's nothing you're lacking in the normal zoom range, I'd not bother personally!

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Wednesday 12th September 2012
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
There's nothing you're lacking in the normal zoom range, I'd not bother personally!
Seems a big gap between 24mm and 70mm...

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Wednesday 12th September 2012
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
If your not rich enough for this one get a sigma 18-50f2.8 OS, damned near as good as the canon 17-55f2.8IS and a lot cheaper than the nikon.

Only downside is its not FTM focus.
At £144 that seems too cheap compared to the others. Is it better than my 18-105?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Wednesday 12th September 2012
quotequote all
Its not about gaps IMO.

I have 17-40, 50, 70-200 all covered.

If I want to go out light with just one lens I have to pick ahead of time which range.

A 24-70 or 24-105 would do that for me (obviously all on ff).

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Wednesday 12th September 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Seems a big gap between 24mm and 70mm...
Sorry, thought you had that in the 18-105, I'd go for a 24-70


Edited by andy-xr on Wednesday 12th September 22:37

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
If you're happy with G-type lenses (which you seem to be), then one lens you might consider is the latest, f/4 version of the 24-120mm

You get close up at 450mm throughout range, VRII, 9-blade diaphragm, ED and nano coating ..... I'd definitely give it a look, especially if you might go FX at some point in the future....

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
K12beano said:
You get close up at 450mm throughout range
Impressive for a 24-120mm!

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Impressive for a 24-120mm!
yes I've been looking at the specs on these for myself - but, of course, it's probably a bit too modern and too zoomy for me.... (and more importantly, I've just got all my aperture rings back and the one G-type in my bag is already an annoyance!)

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
K12beano said:
If you're happy with G-type lenses (which you seem to be), then one lens you might consider is the latest, f/4 version of the 24-120mm

You get close up at 450mm throughout range, VRII, 9-blade diaphragm, ED and nano coating ..... I'd definitely give it a look, especially if you might go FX at some point in the future....
Ooh now that looks a very good shout, thank you. beer

Prob a bit too new to get second-hand I'm guessing?

Elderly

3,736 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Prob a bit too new to get second-hand I'm guessing?
There's an earlier AF-S NIKKOR f/3.5-5.6 version of the 24-120 which I'm sure could be got cheaply but IIRC it wasn't highly regarded.

Ari

Original Poster:

19,814 posts

244 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for that. I'll hang out for the better one then, I've made the mistake before of opting for the cheaper one, only to regret it and buy the dearer one anyway.

Buy cheap, buy twice and all that...

Cheib

25,365 posts

204 months

Thursday 13th September 2012
quotequote all
The 24-120 F4 is a good shout especially if you are going soemwhere and only want to take one lens.

The choice between the 17-55 and 24-70 is really down to your style of photography not forgetting that the 24-70 will work on FX bodies too. For that reason the 17-55 loses value quicker in the second hand market....you should be able to buy one for £600 or so second hand whilst a seocond hand 24-70 will cost £900. Those are prices bought off forums not dealers. The classifieds on Talk Photography is excellent for buying camera gear....you need a minimum post count though to have access to the classifieds.