RE: Hennessey CTS-V VR1200 Twin-Turbo Coupe
RE: Hennessey CTS-V VR1200 Twin-Turbo Coupe
Monday 10th September 2012

Hennessey CTS-V VR1200 Twin-Turbo Coupe

Cadillac's flagship tuned by John Hennessey, with predictable results!



The Cadillac CTS-V is not a car that requires any more power. This is because, thanks to a slightly detuned supercharged V8 from the Corvette ZR1, it already makes 556hp. It therefore has parity with its European rivals such as the 552hp BMW M6. But the Americans are never quite happy just maintaining parity, are they?

To that end, here's the Hennessey CTS-V Twin-Turbo VR1200. As you may know, Hennessey is famous for producing crazy power outputs from modified cars, often American. It is perhaps most famous in Britain for the Dodge Vipers produced in the late 1990s and the Lotus Exige-based Venom GT. The CTS-V VR1200 is classic Hennessey; basically, make as much power as possible and put it on sale!


Ok, its products are (slightly) more refined than that concept, but this CTS-V is all about the numbers. Out goes the regular 6.2-litre V8, substituted with a 7.0-litre unit. The supercharger is replaced with two turbos. The modifications also include forged internals, a new cam, high-flow cylinder heads and injectors and an entirely new exhaust system. The Cadillac ECU is also replaced with one of Hennessey's own design. The result? 1,224hp and 1,109lb ft. Even allowing for drivetrain losses, Hennessey claims 1,066hp at the wheels(!).

Performance is predictably stupendous: 0-60mph in 2.9 seconds, a 10.2 second quarter-mile time at 141mph (sorry, Americans still do this) and a top speed of 242mph. The VR1200 is manual, though Hennessey will reinforce the standard Cadillac auto if you don't fancy swapping cogs with 1,224hp to concentrate on...


Predictably, upgrades have been made elsewhere in an attempt to harness the rampant horsepower of the CTS-V Twin-Turbo. The brakes are carbon ceramic, for example, and feature gigantic 384mm discs all-round; the fronts are grabbed by eight-piston calipers, with six at the rear. Michelin Pilot Super Sport tyres are also fitted, though traction will probably remain an issue regardless of the rubber with 1,224hp! Hennessey has also tweaked the CTS-V's magnetic dampers.

External changes include a carbon front splitter,rear diffuser and some swollen wheelarches. Alright, the bonnet vents are a bit outlandish but the overall effect is fairly restrained given the performance available.

Hennessey will only build 12 examples of the CTS-V Twin-Turbo VR1200. However, with saloon and estate variants of the Cadillac also available, we can only hope further special editions can be made of those cars for perhaps the world's greatest sleepers...



Author
Discussion

Blukoo

Original Poster:

3,812 posts

224 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
I think that is what you call a "brute".

I love it.

Jalexp

19 posts

179 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
I guess that's what firing a breeze block out of a cannon looks like.

14-7

6,233 posts

218 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
MY EYES!!!

vomit

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

210 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
The Americans are really getting the hang of turbos now aren't they?

Logie

835 posts

243 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Crazy, bonkers and pointless but i love it (Except the look of it) lol smile

Tobeman

156 posts

176 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Do you reckon I could pass it off as a Prius to her back at home?



anything fast

983 posts

191 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
must have big issues with traction because 10.2 for q/mile is not that quick for how much power this thing has. i have seen evos and supras do that at santa pod with 500 less horsepower, but 242mph is epic!!

BlackCup

1,235 posts

210 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
I suppose rear view visabilty isnt really necessary when you can leave everything behind quite easily!

renrut

1,478 posts

232 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Estate one please, then go RS6 baiting cool

JdmRacer

40 posts

177 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
anything fast said:
must have big issues with traction because 10.2 for q/mile is not that quick for how much power this thing has. i have seen evos and supras do that at santa pod with 500 less horsepower, but 242mph is epic!!
I say it's because of traction problems,weight issues and evo's and supra's would have short ratio gears why this would obviously need long ratios for 242mph. Love the car I wonder how happy it is to swing out the tail in her?

Edited by JdmRacer on Monday 10th September 15:43

CBR JGWRR

6,580 posts

176 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Want.

How much?

mylesmcd

2,583 posts

246 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
is it being made?

do we have a prototype?

not sure if just head line grabber!!

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

225 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Epic truely epic.

Brabus will not be happy about this... Will need to up the power they produce

spoodler

2,299 posts

182 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Ugly, pointless and vulgar!

But I am so glad that stuff like this is being produced...

NRS

26,036 posts

228 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Not a great sleeper surely... looks too crazy.

RX7

258 posts

271 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
anything fast said:
must have big issues with traction because 10.2 for q/mile is not that quick for how much power this thing has. i have seen evos and supras do that at santa pod with 500 less horsepower, but 242mph is epic!!
There is a joke about Supras (but it goes for any road car when it comes to the 1/4 mile), whats the difference between a 500hp Supra and 700hp Supra, about a tenth of a second. As you say, traction is the biggest issue, its just impossible to put that much power down. Still, 10 seconds ish down the 1/4 mile is seriously quick, thats big bike territory!

I would love to see some 50 - 70 or 70 - 100 times!

StuttgartJem

87 posts

207 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
I want to hate it but I can't !
I'll take it in estate format please

seefarr

1,828 posts

213 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
JdmRacer said:
anything fast said:
must have big issues with traction because 10.2 for q/mile is not that quick for how much power this thing has. i have seen evos and supras do that at santa pod with 500 less horsepower, but 242mph is epic!!
I say it's because of traction problems,weight issues and evo's and supra's would have short ratio gears why this would obviously need long ratios for 242mph. Love the car I wonder how happy it is to swing out the tail in her?boxedin
Why would you need more than one gear with 1200hp and a 7 litre V8?

mat205125

17,790 posts

240 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
Looks like a Zeemax or Rieger Corrado in profile

Fastra

4,289 posts

236 months

Monday 10th September 2012
quotequote all
BlackCup said:
I suppose rear view visabilty isnt really necessary when you can leave everything behind quite easily!
Backing up to the loading bay doors at B&Q might be a different matter though...!

biggrin