Subaru Forester - should I/shouldn't I
Subaru Forester - should I/shouldn't I
Author
Discussion

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
Right, simple.

Current:
The family Volvo V70 140bhp estate, 120k miles. Black with leather, looks posh even though it's a shed car is refusing to die but at the same time is pissing fluids/smoke and the dashboard is starting to look like a Christmas tree. Liking the comfort and ageless charm, not liking mpg but can live with it.

Been looking at Subaru Forester S-turbo 103k miles - £1000 to swap (hopefully less but I've never been great at haggling)

Thoughts? MPG? Driving fun? Forester looks in good nick. 26 mile round trip to work. (most of my fuel cost is due to the photo location game!). 4x4/ground clearance would be handy for camping/trips up north in the snow.

ps. what do I need to look for when viewing?


80quattro

1,814 posts

222 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
It'll be great over Winter.

Don't expect it to be any more reliable than your Volvo, or any cheaper to run. It probably won't be. Buy an A4 Avant TDi quattro

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
80quattro said:
It'll be great over Winter.

Don't expect it to be any more reliable than your Volvo, or any cheaper to run. It probably won't be. Buy an A4 Avant TDi quattro

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
worth £2k more than the forester? My fault.... i forgot to say I refuse to pay more than £2k for a car. I do appreciate the input though, is an Audi more reliable?

I should also be buying a diesel focus/astra but can't bring myself to it.

cat220

2,762 posts

242 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
4wd over winter would be great. You won't have the same luggage capacity in the forester as you currently have in the v70. Also there is no such thing as an economical turbo Subaru.

STURBO

371 posts

187 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
Great cars, there are some bargains about.

Real world MPG about 25-28.

30 on a run, 20 round town or if you put your foot down.

That's not bad for a petrol permanent 4x4 with 177bhp.

Won't be as comfortable for long drives as the Volvo. They are a bit noisy at cruising speed and seats only so so. But much quicker and surprisingly good in the bends. I really enjoyed mine. Only changed as I wanted the 2.5 later Forester.

Look out for good service history and cambelt change, it might be due it's 2nd one now.

Great cars, but obviously at 10yrs old there will be some issues, but you'll be having very low depreciation. So unless you do big miles it will be cheap fun motoring.



80quattro

1,814 posts

222 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
noell35 said:
80quattro said:
It'll be great over Winter.

Don't expect it to be any more reliable than your Volvo, or any cheaper to run. It probably won't be. Buy an A4 Avant TDi quattro

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
worth £2k more than the forester? My fault.... i forgot to say I refuse to pay more than £2k for a car. I do appreciate the input though, is an Audi more reliable?

I should also be buying a diesel focus/astra but can't bring myself to it.
Get an A4 1.8 petrol quattro to be around budget http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
Definitely more reliable than a Subaru. A good friend of mine has a 1997 A6 he bought four years ago for £800. Its just ticked over 310,000 miles.

billzeebub

3,905 posts

226 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
I have a 2004 Forester 2.0 Turbo that I bought a few months ago from a Subaru dealer. It had done 80k miles and was very well specd. I paid £4250 for it and intended to keep it solely for this summer as a camping/ RoadTrip car before selling it to a Winter Worrier!.. I have been mega impressed with it and will now keep it, my brother is also now determined to buy a newer one ( but not the newest incarnation which we both think looks a tad generic) when he comes back from his foreign posting. I absoloutely love it, and as a Winter car I am looking forward to using it.

..will say though that these do tend to be bought by farmer types, and mine was no different. Although in superb mechanical condition it does have lots of bodywork scratches and imperfections and a stained boot carpet. Personally I like this, as it makes me less anal about using it. My other 3 cars are showroom fresh minters and accordingly cause me headaches about leaving them anywhere etc..the Subaru is refreshingly unencumbered by such worries. I love it, and the dealer has impressed me with their friendliness and service ( that rare thing nowadays-a family dealer group). The Legacy is also sensational, though lose some ground clearance and gain some extra interior space

Regarding fuel consumption..if you are using the excellent turbo performance, then frugality plummets. However when trundling off-turbo, it is fairly reasonable and certainly not what you would call thirsty

..would,say though check the rear shocks. They have a tendency to fail/ sag at around this age/ mileage. If you look at Foresters you will see some ride higher than others. Measure the gap between tyre and wheelarch on a good one and make sure yours is 'up'. In the dealer I bought from there was one which had sagged ( maybe someone had replaced the shocks with cheapie units, or maybe they were knackered- the Dealer reckoned it was okay, but you could see a visible difference)..apparently expensive parts and fitting at Subaru Dealers to do it right. The car I bought had newish shocks that wre very clean.

Edited by billzeebub on Tuesday 18th September 23:20


Edited by billzeebub on Tuesday 18th September 23:26

Fozziebear

1,840 posts

167 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
I have a non turbo 1998, just done 145,000, nice car. Keep it serviced, some have done some very high mileage upto and over 180,000

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
cat220 said:
You won't have the same luggage capacity in the forester as you currently have in the v70
hmmm bit of a worry, we did fill the V70 with camping gear. Having said that we did have friends who turned up in a Fiat 500...Christ knows how they managed that!

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
billzeebub said:
I love it, and the dealer has impressed me with their friendliness and service ( that rare thing nowadays-a family dealer group).
If i take the plunge I'll PM you for details!

Burrito

1,705 posts

247 months

Tuesday 18th September 2012
quotequote all
What about a legacy? Better looking than the forester IMO and probably a better steer too.
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012... should be able to haggle that down to £2k!

Legacywr

15,457 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
Why do you say that Subarus are so unreliable 80quattro?

corvus

431 posts

179 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
noell35 said:
80quattro said:
It'll be great over Winter.

Don't expect it to be any more reliable than your Volvo, or any cheaper to run. It probably won't be. Buy an A4 Avant TDi quattro

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
is an Audi more reliable?
No.

A mate has owned an Impreza turbo for five years, and has owned a Legacy 3.0 Spec B for the last three years, and both have only needed servicing and consumables. I should imagine a Forester will be no different. It will ride a lot better than an A4 Avant TDi quattro if you're bothered about such things.

noell35

Original Poster:

3,177 posts

175 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
An Audi or Legacy would be great but neither give the extra ground clearance I was looking for. An allroad is going to be too dear, an XC70 would probably be good but I'm not sure about the reliability vs a Subaru. I'm off to see the Forester on Friday now as long as it isn't sold. The guy has provisionally offered a reasonable price for the V70 so we'll wait and see. Thanks for all the input

STURBO

371 posts

187 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
If you need good ground clearance then the Outback is worth a look. Not a quick as the Turbo Forester, but still very capable off road and a bigger boot.

Liquid Tuna

1,403 posts

183 months

Wednesday 19th September 2012
quotequote all
80quattro said:
noell35 said:
80quattro said:
It'll be great over Winter.

Don't expect it to be any more reliable than your Volvo, or any cheaper to run. It probably won't be. Buy an A4 Avant TDi quattro

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
worth £2k more than the forester? My fault.... i forgot to say I refuse to pay more than £2k for a car. I do appreciate the input though, is an Audi more reliable?

I should also be buying a diesel focus/astra but can't bring myself to it.
Get an A4 1.8 petrol quattro to be around budget http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...
Definitely more reliable than a Subaru. A good friend of mine has a 1997 A6 he bought four years ago for £800. Its just ticked over 310,000 miles.
You're joking, right? You're not really saying an Audi is more reliable than a Subaru?