F1 v Champ v IRL

Author
Discussion

foster3jd

Original Poster:

3,773 posts

255 months

Sunday 22nd August 2004
quotequote all
For excitement, Champ cars seem to be good value for money this season and Wilson has made a good showing, but for British interest Indy Racing League has got be the clear winner... latest result from Pikes Peak:
1. Franchitti GBR
2. Fernandez MEX
3. Wheldon GBR
4. Manning GBR

I have always been a massive F1 fan, but Herr Schumacher and Ferrari have made this season so predictable and boring that I'm now more interested in the American scene.

Do others feel the same way?

308gt4

710 posts

275 months

Sunday 22nd August 2004
quotequote all
no.....and the driving standard in the Champs/IRL is pathetic, especially when it rains.

Years like this are never long enough, the worst year was when the mcLaren garagisti won all bar one race

hornet

6,333 posts

265 months

Monday 23rd August 2004
quotequote all
308gt4 said:
no.....and the driving standard in the Champs/IRL is pathetic, especially when it rains.


IRL has never run in the rain...

Standards in Champ Car are ok if you ask me - I'd rather see drivers have a go and balls it up than just trundle round for a point.

The one thing I will criticise IRL for it pit lane discipline. That goes for NASCAR too. Time and time again you see cars being waved out straight into the path of another car. Recipe for disaster.

jamesc

2,820 posts

299 months

Monday 23rd August 2004
quotequote all
I also listen to the IRL races on www.wibc.com live. They are realy entertaining because you never know who is going to win unlike F1. It is even more pleasing when Britons come in 1st, 3rd and 4th!

McNab

1,627 posts

289 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
308gt4 said:
no.....and the driving standard in the Champs/IRL is pathetic, especially when it rains.

Mario Andretti ? Villeneuve? Montoya?

Been watching Indycars since long before the IRL/Champ split, and still enjoy both. Lots of very good drivers (like Franchitti & Bourdais), good racing, some daft rules, but great value.


308gt4

710 posts

275 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
well we get the Indy here on the Gold Coast in Oz and the year before last in rained and the pace car was TOO quick for the "drivers" with wets on so I may be biased asI paid to watch pros go round the track but ended up watching a Honda pass the finish line before the hot shots.

Andretti (Mario) is still a good driver but to say JV is a good driver because he won in a car that was the class of the field in '97 is a bit of a stretch, he has a death wish and blew up more motors than Sato...again just my bias

Also look at the amount of crashes that happen in IRL/Champ in the pits and on the corners as opposed to F1 where the drivers KNOW where the limit of the car is and the length of the car (most of the time)

Scratch'n'Diff

6,110 posts

281 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
foster3jd said:

Do others feel the same way?


Yup. Well, about F1 anyway.

Although F1 is'nt boring because of Schumacher and Co. Remember the days of Renault dominance?
Its because F1 has been made a joke ever since Senna and Ratty died.
More changes than a Marks & Sparks fitting room. And all in the name of safety.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for drivers not getting killed. But F1 IS a dangerous sport, and drivers will get hurt. It goes with the territory.

They should have ONLY made changes in cockpit safety design, wheel teathers and impact force dissipation.

SD

ccharlie6

773 posts

255 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
in terms of ultimate speed though F1 is still streets ahead around circuits, compare the qualifying times of the montreal track where both F1 and champ car go.


F1 = 1.12:275 R.schumacher BMW williams

Champ Car = 1.19:665 A.Tagliani Ford Cosworth

that time would have plonked him on the back of the grid behind the minardi's.

there's probably more overtaking though

jimmyc412t2

84 posts

252 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
ccharlie6 said:
in terms of ultimate speed though F1 is still streets ahead around circuits, compare the qualifying times of the montreal track where both F1 and champ car go.


F1 = 1.12:275 R.schumacher BMW williams

Champ Car = 1.19:665 A.Tagliani Ford Cosworth

that time would have plonked him on the back of the grid behind the minardi's.

there's probably more overtaking though


Mind you there's been a chassis freeze in champ car for a few years now though IIRC. But yes, F1 is still miles quicker. This flatters champ car remember, as Montreal is point and squirt and they don't lack horsepower. Brakes are steel, too.

Actually, putting it like that makes Tag's time quite impressive It used to be the case that a champ car deficiency was made up with 200bhp extra (in the mid nineties, they were pumping out 900 to F1's 700 odd at the start of the 3.0l era in '95)

But F1s insane development and Champcars restrictions (back to more like 700 i think) shows how good those chassis are despite thier disadvantages in weight and technology

bad boy

821 posts

279 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
never seen a irl race but i have been watching a bit of champ car lately and imo its a lot more intresting than f1.....

jimmyc412t2

84 posts

252 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
bad boy said:
never seen a irl race but i have been watching a bit of champ car lately and imo its a lot more intresting than f1.....


IRL... never been riveted by an IRL race yet. they tend to thunder round ovals millimeters apart but not actually doing much!!

Champ cars is OK, but it was FANTASTIC in its heyday ('93-2000ish) Particularly Alex Zanardi's exploits during his time with Ganassi.

(Fondly remember *THAT* pass at Laguna Seca...)

condor

8,837 posts

263 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
foster3jd said:
For excitement, Champ cars seem to be good value for money this season and Wilson has made a good showing, but for British interest Indy Racing League has got be the clear winner... latest result from Pikes Peak:
1. Franchitti GBR
2. Fernandez MEX
3. Wheldon GBR
4. Manning GBR

I have always been a massive F1 fan, but Herr Schumacher and Ferrari have made this season so predictable and boring that I'm now more interested in the American scene.

Do others feel the same way?


I only got round to watching the Pikes Peak race in the early hours of this morning (about 0130, think it was on channel 5. )
I'm also a massive F1 fan

I'm still more interested in F1 than anything else...in the sense that I have to watch the races live and go to the Brit GP each year...subscribe to an F1 site - and need a daily fix of F1 news, gossip, comment etc.

Interest in all other forms of motorsport increased dramatically when NTL laid a cable outside my house 4 years ago
Having access to Eurosport...opened up a whole new TV viewing motorsport world for me and for others

So it's being able to watch MotoGp, WRC, the Dakar, IRL, champ cars, touring cars etc. that generates interest...but it's only F1 that is given prime time on terrestrial TV.

I just enjoy all of them









foster3jd

Original Poster:

3,773 posts

255 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
jimmyc412t2 said:
IRL... never been riveted by an IRL race yet. they tend to thunder round ovals millimeters apart but not actually doing much!!
You wouldn't be saying that if you'd seen Schekter draft past 6-7 cars whilst going 3-4 wide into the turn during the Indy 500... move of the season!!!!!

ps. word is that IRL will be using a couple or road circuits next year, so not sure what that means for the future of the Champ car series but will give distinct advantage to teams that run in both IRL and Champ as they should already have the set-up info.

Eric Mc

123,903 posts

280 months

Wednesday 25th August 2004
quotequote all
I used to follow CART when I first got Eurosport (1997 - live races every Sunday etc) and enjoyed it a lot. Unfortunately, CART has self destructed in the intervening period and IRL's TV scheduling for Europe has been less than impressive. With the Brits doing well in IRL its time that it was taken up by amainstream broadcaster and put out at more sociable hours.

I was anti-IRL myself when it started - I felt it was a bit of a Micky Mouse series and that CART was the true bearer of the open wheel lagacy in American motor sport. However, it's CART that has withered away and IRL that has gradually gained a foothold. The fact that next year IRL is running some races off the ovals is a good thing and I hope it broadens its appeal and makes itself more attractive to overseas TV broadcasters as a result.

hornet

6,333 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th August 2004
quotequote all
IRL will be running at Infineon (Sears Point) and Watkins Glen next season. Interesting really - the IRL is now the antithesis of everything it was set up to be. The whole point was a US based all oval series with up and coming US talent and smaller teams who maybe didn't have the budgets to run in CART. That was true for a bit, but then CART got too big for its boots and tried to become an international series, sponsors got jittery with the result being all the top teams jumping ship to the IRL complete with an influx of foreign (in many cases better) drivers. Result? IRL costs go up and the small teams can't afford to run. Not sure what the road courses will mean for the 05 chassis either. Presumably big changes will be needed to the all oval spec they run presently. That'll probably kill off any small teams left.

foster3jd

Original Poster:

3,773 posts

255 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
Given the criticism of F1 at the moment, I thought it'd be a good time to revive this thread.

Here is my assessment of the current season:

F1 - probably at an all time low from a fans perspective, with overtaking moves almost non-existent, or missed by truely awful TV coverage - the exception being Button passing Schumi last weekend.

IRL - another interesting season with Andretti Green and Penske battling for leads in every round, plus good British interest with Wheldon and Franchitti both challenging for the title.

Champ - seems to have improved again with more drivers/cars contending for victories, including our own Justin Wilson who is the form driver over the last few races - building nicely to a climax with Tracy, Bourdais and Wilson all to the fore.

In summary, if all three were to be covered live simultaneously, I'd be watching the Champ cars, and flicking first to IRL and finally to F1.

I'm shocked to admit that in these times, I actually prefer US single seater racing but suspect that I'm maybe not alone!



>> Edited by foster3jd on Wednesday 27th July 13:51

Eric Mc

123,903 posts

280 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
The more low budget Champ Car gets - the more fun it seems to be.

maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere.

foster3jd

Original Poster:

3,773 posts

255 months

Wednesday 27th July 2005
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The more low budget Champ Car gets - the more fun it seems to be.

maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere.
Very true.... and then there's GP2

ps. looking forward to A1 GP

saxo-stew

8,018 posts

253 months

Thursday 28th July 2005
quotequote all
aren't F1's tv ratings and some venue's attendance up on previous years?

JonRB

78,002 posts

287 months

Thursday 28th July 2005
quotequote all
Please excuse my ignorance, but could someone explain the fundamental differences betwen IRL and Champ?

All I really know is that once there was IndyCars (aka. "Formula 1 for Americans" ) and then they split into IRL and Champ, and that's about all I know. Shocking really considering that in the past I've accused Americans of being parochial.

>> Edited by JonRB on Thursday 28th July 14:07