another gt3 bites the dust
another gt3 bites the dust
Author
Discussion

LaurasOtherHalf

Original Poster:

21,429 posts

226 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/PORSCHE-911-996-GT3-2005...

this one is bound to make it back to market so a heads up

mrdemon

21,146 posts

295 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
not like it's a right off is it, looks ok to me, hardly bites the dust

bqf

2,290 posts

201 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Looks easily repairable that - I reckon it's a track day casualty into the tyre wall.

Would make a great race car

Porkupine

1,722 posts

195 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
I really like it. Except the wheels.

sportsandclassic

3,774 posts

248 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Really does look like light damage... Wonder why it was just not repaired ?

Really niggles me when rear engine cars are towed that way with engine far back past axle.

Mike

LaurasOtherHalf

Original Poster:

21,429 posts

226 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
not like it's a right off is it, looks ok to me, hardly bites the dust
true, but as often is with these "undeclared" offs they do make it back as surprisingly "original" examples.

Frik

13,690 posts

273 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Looks to me likes there's a crease on the RHS behind the door too. Buying a speed yellow 996 GT3 is looking like a more and more perilous undertaking...

DKL

4,977 posts

252 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Its not exactly cheap either for something of slightly unknown provenance.

Terminator X

20,784 posts

234 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
They also have a M6 with "very light damage" for sale.

How did the GT3 end up with these guys then if the damage is so light?

TX.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Very surprised that's not being repaired. No track day insurance possibly?

fioran0

2,410 posts

202 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
i was wondering how many folks would come on saying that it hardly looks anything hence the reason i held off posting. at first scan theres nothing much untoward at all huh but look at the photo of the rear lid and again with the lid up and see how everything is subtly pushed across to the right.

the rear left chassis rail is bent. it may well be possible to cut out and fix, pretty much anything can but thats an iceberg right there. you are looking at seriously huge amounts of time and cost to get it right even before you start on the amount of under the skin body parts you would be needing to order to replace.
the back rails are the weak point on these cars, it doesnt take much if you go in backwards at a slight angle to kill the chassis and as a result its the one place you dont want to hit anything. its compounded by the effort that is required to get into it to replace and how many other body parts bend and buckle when this gives.
having spent way too much time in cups and at race weekends its the one thing you dont want ever want to see. front end bumps look much worse but are super easy to repair. the rear end is the exact opposite. usually only a ripple here or there but the chassis is as dead as a dodo.

as an aside, the engine hangs from a carrier attached at each rail. when one bends the engine is twisted or pushed over. sometimes you are lucky and the engine or transmission mounts give way. if not then you need to open up everything and crack check the lot (engine and gearbox) to see what took the load)

that ones a vipers nest just waiting for the unwary.


Edited by fioran0 on Saturday 29th September 13:46

keep it lit

3,388 posts

197 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
not cheap is it?...

we just bought this for the same money!

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/mot...


yum!!

LaurasOtherHalf

Original Poster:

21,429 posts

226 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
So who's going to email for the reg number then? wink

kingstondc5

8,040 posts

234 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
So who's going to email for the reg number then? wink
Cant you?

Porkupine

1,722 posts

195 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
kingstondc5 said:
Cant you?
+1 LOL

Slippydiff

16,424 posts

253 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
fioran0 said:
at first scan theres nothing much untoward at all huh but look at the photo of the rear lid and again with the lid up and see how everything is subtly pushed across to the right.

the rear left chassis rail is bent. it may well be possible to cut out and fix, pretty much anything can but thats an iceberg right there. you are looking at seriously huge amounts of time and cost to get it right even before you start on the amount of under the skin body parts you would be needing to order to replace.
the back rails are the weak point on these cars, it doesnt take much if you go in backwards at a slight angle to kill the chassis and as a result its the one place you dont want to hit anything. its compounded by the effort that is required to get into it to replace and how many other body parts bend and buckle when this gives.
having spent way too much time in cups and at race weekends its the one thing you dont want ever want to see. front end bumps look much worse but are super easy to repair. the rear end is the exact opposite. usually only a ripple here or there but the chassis is as dead as a dodo.

as an aside, the engine hangs from a carrier attached at each rail. when one bends the engine is twisted or pushed over. sometimes you are lucky and the engine or transmission mounts give way. if not then you need to open up everything and crack check the lot (engine and gearbox) to see what took the load)
.

Exactly. One photo tells all, that being the one which shows the mismatch between the N/S rear quarter and the engine cover :



Insurance companies don't write these cars off "for the fun of it".
The later shells will pull, but not like an air-cooled car. The modern body shell is expendable, the occupants within it, not so.
As Neil says, there might not be any visible suspension damage, but once the rear leg has been jigged/replaced, there's a good chance the rear crossmember assembly won't fit.

Here's what the crossmember assembly looks like when you do the job properly . . . . . :


ChrisW.

8,156 posts

285 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
keep it lit said:
not cheap is it?...

we just bought this for the same money!

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/mot...


yum!!
Are you racing or running it on track days ?

If track days do you have an H pattern manual box ?

I understand that the sequential boxes are on 8 hour rebuilds and if you try to be kind you will probably break it ... so maybe worth checking your options.

fioran0

2,410 posts

202 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
It's meant to be approx 40hours assuming no mishaps but everyone I know, including myself seemed to end up on 20hr refresh cycles. ymmv.
Fwiw offsetting a refresh even though the box feels ok just gives you a bigger bill when you do stick it in, plus as stuff wears the potential for a big issue increases. Selecting 2 gears at once for example with the resulting pop.

Redarress

730 posts

237 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
Typical Pistonheads doom merchants.

The bloke selling it told me it should cut out. I am assuming he meant colour cut
smile

ChrisW.

8,156 posts

285 months

Sunday 30th September 2012
quotequote all
Did he work for T Cut ?