Four people insured on a single vehicle?
Four people insured on a single vehicle?
Author
Discussion

Flipatron

Original Poster:

2,089 posts

226 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Me and my brother are thinking of going halves on an Elise. My partner will need to be insured as will his.

How will the insurance work, a policy for each of us with two extra named drivers or a single policy for four?

I don't like the idea of a single policy (probably in my name) that three other people hang off.

pops and bangs

674 posts

185 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I could be wrong (probably am) but I don't think you can have two policies on one vehicle.

It will need to be one policy with additional drivers as named drivers.

Flipatron

Original Poster:

2,089 posts

226 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
pops and bangs said:
I could be wrong (probably am) but I don't think you can have two policies on one vehicle.

It will need to be one policy with additional drivers as named drivers.
I was thinking the same thing, stops multiple claims for a single accident.

There must be a way of splitting a single policy onto two main drivers and two additional drivers.

kambites

71,245 posts

249 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Why would you want two "main drivers"? The main driver just needs to be the one person who uses the car most (or if it's close, they don't seem to care) and the other three can be named drivers.

I'm fairly sure you can't have two policies providing third party cover on the same car, but the main driver and the policy holder are not linked in any way so any of you can be the policy holder (although some, maybe all, insurers insist that it's the registered keeper).


Edited by kambites on Thursday 4th October 09:32

LukeSi

5,780 posts

189 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Who is gonna be the RK? Go with whichever of you gets the cheaper quote.

Edited by LukeSi on Thursday 4th October 11:52

ben5732

763 posts

184 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Remember reading somewhere once you could have two policies but would be fraud if you claimed from both of them, was most likely wrong though.

Riknos

4,701 posts

232 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
You can't have two policies, it's illegal. One of you will have to be the main driver and the others named driver.

stemll

5,434 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Riknos said:
You can't have two policies, it's illegal. One of you will have to be the main driver and the others named driver.
No it's not. It would be illegal to claim on them both for a single incident but no reason two people cannot insure something in their own name to cover it for when they are using or responsible for it.

For example, if I am going to view a car that's for sale, perfectly legal for me to take out a day policy to cover my test drive.

kambites

71,245 posts

249 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
In practice it usually is illegal, because every (normal) insurance policy I've ever read states that the contract is void if another third-party policy exists on the vehicle.

McSam

6,753 posts

203 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
LukeSi said:
Who is gonna be the RC? Go with whichever of you gets the cheaper quote.
This. If you two owners are going to drive it a similar amount, get yourself on confused.com or whatever and see who is the most insurable, then make them the registered keeper (which starts with a K hehe ), and insure them as the main driver and the other three as named. No issue at all with that.

You aren't supposed to have two permanent policies in place for the same insurable interest. If you insure a car for a test drive, even though that's temporary, that means the owner's insurance is invalid for the time you're driving it and using that policy.

anonymous-user

82 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
If one is the RC, will the others be C of E?

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

293 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
When I bought a 1986 RX7 to share with my brother I called the insurance chap on the telephone, explained the car was going to be used equally by both of us and gave details of the adresses we'd be keeping it at. They then insured it with me as the main driver with the other drivers as named drivers.

Full disclosure to the insurer and I made the details their problem. I suppose it makes it hard to shop around, but as it cost us £150 fully comp I wasn't bothered.

Mrs Muppet drove it once, and Dr-Muppet-in-Law drove it once, neither of them really got on with it (no PAS or torque, and the exhaust was a triffle loud). So hardly worth putting the girls on the policy.

My 4 year old nephew still does a good impression of the car, which involves holding his hands in front of him like the pop-up lights, and screaming.

LukeSi

5,780 posts

189 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
McSam said:
LukeSi said:
Who is gonna be the RC? Go with whichever of you gets the cheaper quote.
This. If you two owners are going to drive it a similar amount, get yourself on confused.com or whatever and see who is the most insurable, then make them the registered keeper (which starts with a K hehe ), and insure them as the main driver and the other three as named. No issue at all with that.

You aren't supposed to have two permanent policies in place for the same insurable interest. If you insure a car for a test drive, even though that's temporary, that means the owner's insurance is invalid for the time you're driving it and using that policy.
In my defense auto correct.

anonymous-user

82 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Cool American Football defense, but what's your defence?

LukeSi

5,780 posts

189 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Cool American Football defense, but what's your defence?
Auto correct hehe

Flipatron

Original Poster:

2,089 posts

226 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
The problem is I don't want the liability of an extra 2 people hanging off an insurance policy with my name on it.

If my brothers or his partner stuffs it I'll be paying for it for the next few year whenever I renew my insurance.

98elise

32,221 posts

189 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
In practice it usually is illegal, because every (normal) insurance policy I've ever read states that the contract is void if another third-party policy exists on the vehicle.
Only the person driving the car would be liable for 3rd part losses, the other policy could not be claimed on while the other person had control of the car. Insurance companies are fine with most odd situations, as long as you let them know, and the intent is not to commit fraud.

As an example, my wife insures our daily driver (with me named), but is neither the RK or the owner. The insurance co are happy with this, as its the most correct way of insuring the car (I bought it, its my responsibilty, but she drives it most).