Foolhardy cyclist ?
Author
Discussion

colonel c

Original Poster:

8,053 posts

268 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
I think this guy was either foolhardy in that he was tempting me into passing him too closely or perhaps just arrogant and selfish. What do you guys think.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9lD0cOgoCA&fea...

miniman

30,047 posts

291 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Could you not have put two wheels on the verge?

lindrup119

1,235 posts

172 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
I HATE that. Should have given him a friendly horn beep at first and then stepped up. The thing is he seems completely unaware that you are there which if anything annoys me more....

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

187 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
That's my brother!!!!










No I'm joking, you should of driven into the back of him.

bert11

286 posts

207 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
most of the time he's riding well left of the normal riding position which indicates he was ready for you to pass when appropriate. Maybe your vehicle was too wide

MuffDaddy

1,505 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
If you had a faster car behind you would you stop for it?

He has every right to be riding there, didn't seem to put you at risk, held you up for a few moments. I don't personally see any issue (and I am not a lycra wearing bean eater).

S10GTA

13,784 posts

196 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Nothing wrong there.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
miniman said:
Could you not have put two wheels on the cyclist?
A tad harsh, but on reflection... fair.

SmoothCriminal

5,939 posts

228 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Not that it made much difference but as others have said he was well left of the centre of the road.

Tbh depending how much of a rush I was in I reakon I wouldave put two wheels on the verge and had a go at passing him if I was desperate

dontdobends

485 posts

243 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
He pulled over in the end,carn't see what your problem was ,so you added 10seconds to your journey rolleyes

miniman

30,047 posts

291 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
miniman said:
Could you not have put two wheels on the cyclist?
A tad harsh, but on reflection... fair.
hehe

lauda

4,425 posts

236 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
MuffDaddy said:
If you had a faster car behind you would you stop for it?

He has every right to be riding there, didn't seem to put you at risk, held you up for a few moments. I don't personally see any issue (and I am not a lycra wearing bean eater).
If for some reason I was travelling considerably slower than other traffic behind me then, yes, I would.

It's called having good manners and being considerate. Things that seem to be in short supply these days where the 'I'm alright Jack' mindset prevails.

MuffDaddy

1,505 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
lauda said:
If for some reason I was travelling considerably slower than other traffic behind me then, yes, I would.

It's called having good manners and being considerate. Things that seem to be in short supply these days where the 'I'm alright Jack' mindset prevails.
I didn't see it as "I'm alright Jack" just a bloke riding his bike.

CraigyMc

18,369 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
MuffDaddy said:
If you had a faster car behind you would you stop for it?

He has every right to be riding there, didn't seem to put you at risk, held you up for a few moments. I don't personally see any issue (and I am not a lycra wearing bean eater).
This.

OP's being unreasonable.

Garlick

40,601 posts

269 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
miniman said:
Could you not have put two wheels on the cyclist?
A tad harsh, but on reflection... fair.
Here we go again then...

poing

8,743 posts

229 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
I'd have pulled over sooner if I was on the bike. Although I'd probably have avoided that road because there isn't a lot of space and too many blind corners for my liking, just takes the wrong kind of person coming the other way for that to go wrong.

DaveH23

3,355 posts

199 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Just watched the video on my phone so a smaller screen but he didnt appear to look behind him at any point.

Did the cyclist know there was a car behind him? We dont know if the OP beeped as he had music in the vid or if the cyclist had ear/headphones in.


londonbabe

2,159 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
He was practically riding on the verge.
It's clear that he was pulling over to let you pass and you chose not to. Normal position would be a couple of feet out.
If your car is so wide that you can't drive down that road and overtake a cyclist who is letting you pass then why drive down that tiny road in it at all?

colonel c

Original Poster:

8,053 posts

268 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
bert11 said:
most of the time he's riding well left of the normal riding position which indicates he was ready for you to pass when appropriate. Maybe your vehicle was too wide
This is why I would give him the benefit of the doubt and call foolhardy. The road is very narrow. If I had attempted to pass sooner I could easily have hit a drainage ditch or other uneven section of verge and the car might have lurched into him. He was relying on me to not be stupid.

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

192 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Only thing i find offensive there is the Queen tribute act on your 1970s Motorola stereohehe