Airbus's not built strong enough?
Airbus's not built strong enough?
Author
Discussion

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
I've been reading through this article by a commercial aircraft engineer and his argument that proposes the vertical stabilisers on Airbus's aircraft are not strong enough.

http://airbusvertstabs.blogspot.hk/

any thoughts on his argument?

tank slapper

7,949 posts

312 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
He claims to be a commercial aircraft engineer, but then he has posted anonymously so who knows if he is? There is not much in that that makes me think so - more likely someone who has read up a bit about how aircraft work and jumped to all sorts of conclusions.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Yep, he's really nailed it there.





db

724 posts

198 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
hmnnn, anonymous American states that Airbus's crash when tail fins fall off but Boeing's B52 without tail fins can fly safely scratchchin

Hackney

7,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Airbus's what?

1a35

894 posts

237 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Airbi ?

db

724 posts

198 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
The aircraft manufacturered by Airbus, the buses of air?
I don't know, educate me please

mrloudly

2,815 posts

264 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
What a load of bks... I bet they use the same stress analysis software as Boeing....

b14

1,292 posts

217 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
And very disingenuous, using the photo of the fin from Air France 447 in the headline - a crash which had nothing to do with the vertical stabiliser failing.

Brother D

4,417 posts

205 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
I'm sure he has worked in the industry - maybe as a waste engineer.

MitchT

17,114 posts

238 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
Leave the poor guy alone. That's his GCSE homework that you're mocking!

ETA: Okay, I've actually read it now. What garbage!

The first illustration of his article about Airbus's vertical stablilisers not being strong enough cites an incident in which a Boeing manufactured plane lost its vertical stabiliser. He also cites AF447 which, as the CVR transcript clearly illustrates, was not behaving like an aircraft that had lost its vertical stabiliser during its final descent. They're just two of holes in his argument. I could go on... but I wont'.

Edited by MitchT on Thursday 18th October 23:06

uncinqsix

3,239 posts

239 months

Friday 19th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Friday 19th October 2012
quotequote all
So his argument is fairly poor then it seems...

I know Boeing has a fairly extensive smear campaign launched against Airbus, and that it's fan boy's can be somewhat fanciful and vocal.

Is the consensus that this would be another example then?

maffski

1,905 posts

188 months

Friday 19th October 2012
quotequote all
The Syrian A320 seemed to hold together fairly well - http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...