What sensible car - 2k?
What sensible car - 2k?
Author
Discussion

Mellow Matt

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
My girlfriend needs a new car, but it needs to be fairly sensible - cheap to run, cheap to insure, ideally 4 seats and about £2k (possibly more if it's extra cheap to run).

It needs to be suitable for motorways as I'll use it to commute to work fairly often, and we have an mx-5 and a couple of bikes for B road blasting and trackdays.

Unfortunately I have pretty much nil knowledge on sensible cars... What would people recommend for the above requirements? We're open to any suggestions as long as it's cheap to insure, cheap to run, and good on fuel.

I was thinking along the lines of Focuses (Focii?), Almeras etc, but I don't really know much about them (or their competitors...).

TIA smile


tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

183 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Accord type r

SWE6SPEED

74 posts

172 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
another MX5

Ian Geary

5,603 posts

221 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Evening,

Is that 4 seats, or 4 doors?

Is she particularly badge conscious?

Do you want it to be younger than 10 years?


I would just put your criteria into Autotrader and see what comes up.

If anything is catching your eye, the Honest John website gives some down to earth car by car reviews, which will highlight major failings.


Ian

Lordbenny

8,752 posts

248 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
This is PistonHeads, we dont 'do' sensible! smile

rallycross

13,749 posts

266 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Focus good choice.
Also worth looking at Polo Tdi Sport 100 02-04 model 5 door, like this. You might get a decent one for £2.5k.
50 mpg, Big enough/powerfull enough to feel at home on the motorway, old but robust.

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...


Mellow Matt

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
tyrewrecker said:
Accord type r
Would love to, but I suspect it falls short of the economical and cheap to insure requirements!

Ian Geary said:
Evening,

Is that 4 seats, or 4 doors?

Is she particularly badge conscious?

Do you want it to be younger than 10 years?

I would just put your criteria into Autotrader and see what comes up.

If anything is catching your eye, the Honest John website gives some down to earth car by car reviews, which will highlight major failings. Ian
4 seats is fine, and badge & age don't matter to us. I've put a search in AutoTrader & PH, but the trouble is is that I don't know which of these sensible cars is best! I've never taken an interest in any of them as they're all so boring, so I know nothing about them hehe

Lordbenny said:
This is PistonHeads, we dont 'do' sensible! smile
Me neither, that's the problem hehe

Mellow Matt

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
rallycross said:
Focus good choice.
Also worth looking at Polo Tdi Sport 100 02-04 model 5 door, like this. You might get a decent one for £2.5k.
50 mpg, Big enough/powerfull enough to feel at home on the motorway, old but robust.

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...
Interesting shout, I'll have a look into them. I've got a thing against Golfs for some reason, but I could probably live with a Polo!

rallycross

13,749 posts

266 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
They drive a lot better than similar year Golf's which are like a wallowing boat in comparison to a good Polo.
They also did a petrol Sport 1.4 100 bhp if you dont fancy the derv

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...

v8250

2,747 posts

240 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
rallycross said:
Focus good choice.
Also worth looking at Polo Tdi Sport 100 02-04 model 5 door, like this. You might get a decent one for £2.5k.
50 mpg, Big enough/powerfull enough to feel at home on the motorway, old but robust.

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...
The Polo's a very good call. I once drove one from Blighty to the Alpes and then onto Venice, back across Italy to Chamonix, then back to Blighty. Remarkably comfortable, very competent on Autoroute & Auostrada, and a real blast of fun in the mountains...it was packed to the gunwales with holiday gear...and even managed to get a speeding ticket!

Mmmm, did the Carabinieri ever get paid? scratchchin

Jw Vw

4,922 posts

192 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Bora diesel?

F1GTRUeno

6,512 posts

247 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Tell her to save up more and get a brand new basic Dacia Sandero.

sawman

5,168 posts

259 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
ford puma, 2k should get a decent one

Mellow Matt

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Bora - could be an option, ta.

Sandero - Perhaps not hehe

Puma - I had thought about it as I do like them, but I doubt they're that good for fuel/tax/insurance...?

aka_kerrly

12,505 posts

239 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
sawman said:
ford puma, 2k should get a decent one
V good suggestion.


tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

183 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Mellow Matt said:
Bora - could be an option, ta.

Sandero - Perhaps not hehe

Puma - I had thought about it as I do like them, but I doubt they're that good for fuel/tax/insurance...?
Not bad on each...more than worth it for.the smiles

sawman

5,168 posts

259 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Mellow Matt said:
Puma - I had thought about it as I do like them, but I doubt they're that good for fuel/tax/insurance...?
tax would be from 135-220 quid a year depending on whether its the 1.4, 1.6 or 1.7

I think you would be looking at mid/high 30's mpg, Insurance is pretty average, I got quoted 450 last week for a 1.7 puma, and 375 for fiat seicento sporting (both about the same age and value)



Mellow Matt

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
sawman said:
tax would be from 135-220 quid a year depending on whether its the 1.4, 1.6 or 1.7

I think you would be looking at mid/high 30's mpg, Insurance is pretty average, I got quoted 450 last week for a 1.7 puma, and 375 for fiat seicento sporting (both about the same age and value)
I've got a mate who's got the 1.7 and recommends it, but I'd like something that does higher mpg really; are the 1.4s & 1.6s any good? I notice they're a lot rarer than the 1.7s.

Also, my gf had an accident recently, so we need something insurance friendly - not sure how a 1.7 Puma would fare.

tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

183 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Mellow Matt said:
I've got a mate who's got the 1.7 and recommends it, but I'd like something that does higher mpg really; are the 1.4s & 1.6s any good? I notice they're a lot rarer than the 1.7s.

Also, my gf had an accident recently, so we need something insurance friendly - not sure how a 1.7 Puma would fare.
They aren't bad, get a quote

Plus you can get a good one for a lot less and put extra towards fuel

sawman

5,168 posts

259 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Mellow Matt said:
I've got a mate who's got the 1.7 and recommends it, but I'd like something that does higher mpg really; are the 1.4s & 1.6s any good? I notice they're a lot rarer than the 1.7s.

Also, my gf had an accident recently, so we need something insurance friendly - not sure how a 1.7 Puma would fare.
I seem to remember that back in the day the 1.4s were well received, not that much slower in real terms than the 1.7. my wife had a 1.7 back in '98, it was great. I have been researching them recently as a possible winter daily driver. There aren't any 1.4's near me so I haven't really looked at them

I would consider a 1.4, one of the joys of the puma is its handling, I cant see that being significantly different with the small motor

have a look on pumapeaople.com - there may be some opinions