Ever wondered if an LPG tank is as strong as they say?
Discussion
MJK 24 said:
Typical Daily Mail nonsense - "It weighs over three tons...". Er, no, the classic Range Rover was barely over two tons.
I thought that. Most importantly the lad is ok.The mothers comment I also found odd about being lucky it was a range rover. Does it make a difference then as to what type of vehicle your stood by when its struck as to your chances of survival?
Edited by BFG TERRANO on Sunday 21st October 19:33
Good to see the speed kills messages has been absorbed by the average daily mail reader.
- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"
- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
said:
Of course the lorry driver was to blame. To cause such damage to a tank like a Range Rover he must have been travelling too fast for the driving conditions. You should be able to stop within the distance you can see
The lorry driver may be to blame for wandering onto the hard shoulder, but physics suggests that had the 42 tonne object being traveling at 20mph when it hit the stationary object (made of aluminium and weighing 20 times less) there would have been an equally unfavourable outcome.But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"
Edited by GoodDoc on Sunday 21st October 19:54
GoodDoc said:
Good to see the speed kills messages has been absorbed by the average daily mail reader.
- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"
Stop in the distance you can see = speed kills and is a daily fail? Sorry, but the stop in the distance you can see and don't drive too fast for the conditions is a standard PH response to any thread about a crash. Indeed it is sensible advice, and it's all over the fireworks display thread, for instance.- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
said:
Of course the lorry driver was to blame. To cause such damage to a tank like a Range Rover he must have been travelling too fast for the driving conditions. You should be able to stop within the distance you can see
The lorry driver may be to blame for wandering onto the hard shoulder, but physics suggests that had the 42 tonne object being traveling at 20mph when it hit the stationary object (made of aluminium and weighing 20 times less) there would have been an equally unfavourable outcome.But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"
Edited by GoodDoc on Sunday 21st October 19:54
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





