Ever wondered if an LPG tank is as strong as they say?
Ever wondered if an LPG tank is as strong as they say?
Author
Discussion

lost in espace

Original Poster:

6,588 posts

236 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all

The Game

2,324 posts

210 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
He needs to buy a lottery ticket

GuitarTech

582 posts

179 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Doesn't look too bad. It'll buff out..jester

BFG TERRANO

2,172 posts

177 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Jig and t cut, you'd never know.

BFG TERRANO

2,172 posts

177 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Jig and t cut, you'd never know.

quiraing

1,649 posts

168 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Watch out there mate, broken number plate, the rozzers will stop you for it.

MJK 24

5,677 posts

265 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Typical Daily Mail nonsense - "It weighs over three tons...". Er, no, the classic Range Rover was barely over two tons.

BFG TERRANO

2,172 posts

177 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
MJK 24 said:
Typical Daily Mail nonsense - "It weighs over three tons...". Er, no, the classic Range Rover was barely over two tons.
I thought that. Most importantly the lad is ok.
The mothers comment I also found odd about being lucky it was a range rover. Does it make a difference then as to what type of vehicle your stood by when its struck as to your chances of survival?

Edited by BFG TERRANO on Sunday 21st October 19:33

wavydave13

136 posts

227 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
I like the reflective strip across the tailgate, lucky the lorry driver spotted that eh ?

GoodDoc

622 posts

205 months

Sunday 21st October 2012
quotequote all
Good to see the speed kills messages has been absorbed by the average daily mail reader.

- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
said:
Of course the lorry driver was to blame. To cause such damage to a tank like a Range Rover he must have been travelling too fast for the driving conditions. You should be able to stop within the distance you can see
The lorry driver may be to blame for wandering onto the hard shoulder, but physics suggests that had the 42 tonne object being traveling at 20mph when it hit the stationary object (made of aluminium and weighing 20 times less) there would have been an equally unfavourable outcome.

But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"

Edited by GoodDoc on Sunday 21st October 19:54

callmedave

2,686 posts

174 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
Is it just me that's missing the bit about an LPG tank?

was the landy fitted with one?


Callmedave

sparkyhx

4,200 posts

233 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
callmedave said:
Is it just me that's missing the bit about an LPG tank?

Callmedave
er....me too

CoolC

4,500 posts

243 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
You can see the tank in the picture.

RJP001

1,173 posts

179 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
You can see a photo that there's a LPG tank in the boot. Looks like the wagon ripped the bodyshell off the chassis as the back wheel looks to still be where it belongs, and probably why the Range Rover wasn't shunted a mile down the road.

sparkyhx

4,200 posts

233 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
didn't spot that - goes to show the statement of LPG safety being no worse and possibly better than petrol in an accident.

Thats quite re-assuring to see that


diddles

446 posts

228 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
callmedave said:
Is it just me that's missing the bit about an LPG tank?

Callmedave
er....me too
Indeed

The article mentions nothing regarding the LPG system. The LPG system, if indeed it is one, could have have been empty and ripped in half during the impact.

lost in espace

Original Poster:

6,588 posts

236 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
diddles said:
Indeed

The article mentions nothing regarding the LPG system. The LPG system, if indeed it is one, could have have been empty and ripped in half during the impact.
diddles it looks intact to me, and I doubt a daily mail journo would even know what lpg is.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
lost in espace said:
diddles it looks intact to me, and I doubt a daily mail journo would even know what lpg is.
No but is causes cancer

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

248 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
GoodDoc said:
Good to see the speed kills messages has been absorbed by the average daily mail reader.

- Gordon , Khon Kaen, United Kingdom, 21/10/2012 04:41
said:
Of course the lorry driver was to blame. To cause such damage to a tank like a Range Rover he must have been travelling too fast for the driving conditions. You should be able to stop within the distance you can see
The lorry driver may be to blame for wandering onto the hard shoulder, but physics suggests that had the 42 tonne object being traveling at 20mph when it hit the stationary object (made of aluminium and weighing 20 times less) there would have been an equally unfavourable outcome.

But I suppose "Speed Kills" is more catchy than "A wide array of factors can be responsible for accidents"

Edited by GoodDoc on Sunday 21st October 19:54
Stop in the distance you can see = speed kills and is a daily fail? Sorry, but the stop in the distance you can see and don't drive too fast for the conditions is a standard PH response to any thread about a crash. Indeed it is sensible advice, and it's all over the fireworks display thread, for instance.

wildcat45

8,159 posts

218 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
He needs to get the rust on the lower tailgate fixed. And that headlining's sagging. They always rust and sag there and IMO ruin the look of a classic RR.