BMW E53 X5 - Petrol Vs Diesel
BMW E53 X5 - Petrol Vs Diesel
Author
Discussion

R12HCO

Original Poster:

826 posts

188 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
I am currently looking at buying an early X5 circa 2001-2003.

The ex-mother-in-law had a 06 3.0d sport which I loved, but my budget does not stretch that far. I noticed it did circa 22 mpg, but she did do alot of short journeys and does not drive in a Manor which is being considerate to fuel consumption even though she never drove fast!! (very much on/off on the pedals).

My question is, what is the real world difference between Petrol and diesel? I know it will be the older diesel Engine but having had conversations with a guy who worked for BMW, he believes there is 1 or 2 mpg real world between the 3.0 petrol and the 3.0 diesel. With cost difference, I cant see much point in the Derv if this is the case? I then look at the parkers spec between the 3.0i and the 4.4 and again there is a 1 mpg difference?

Due to the above, I am struggling to decided what to choose.

Could someone give me any advise? Thanks

Lynch91

525 posts

168 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
My father used to have a 52reg 4.4i and he used to get around 19mpg in town without hanging around! And i think around 21mpg on the motorway.

matchmaker

9,042 posts

229 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
R12HCO said:
I am currently looking at buying an early X5 circa 2001-2003.

The ex-mother-in-law had a 06 3.0d sport which I loved, but my budget does not stretch that far. I noticed it did circa 22 mpg, but she did do alot of short journeys and does not drive in a Manor which is being considerate to fuel consumption even though she never drove fast!! (very much on/off on the pedals).
The squire must be pleased biggrin

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

212 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
The 4.4 will see you with a low/mid-teens average, the 3.0i will get you 21-22, and the 3.0d will get you 27-28, assuming all are driven in a similar fashion. Really, the 4.4 is just too thirsty for regular everyday use.

Whether you think a 5mpg difference between the two 3.0 engines is enough is up to you - I prefer the grunt of the 3.0d, but it costs more for a similarly-aged car, has a much higher potential for expensive repairs, and will only really be worth getting if you're looking at a decent mileage - say 12k+ miles per annum, maybe more.

renrut

1,478 posts

234 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
Not knowing much about BMWs I'd take more of a look at what can go wrong than dwell on MPG, one big bill on a more frugal diesel could wipe out any fuel savings and at the difference of 22 or 23 mpg it wouldn't even take a big bill. Generally older petrol engines are more reliable than the newer higher power diesels.

4.4 V8 for me please.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

216 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
The squire must be pleased biggrin
Surely you mean Lord? smile

matchmaker

9,042 posts

229 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
Motorrad said:
matchmaker said:
The squire must be pleased biggrin
Surely you mean Lord? smile
Sorry, yes, Lord tongue out

Motorrad

6,811 posts

216 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Sorry, yes, Lord tongue out
That said maybe the Lord was delegating that day? wink