Aston Martin Cygnet or MINI Cooper?
Aston Martin Cygnet or MINI Cooper?
Author
Discussion

RosscoPCole

Original Poster:

3,618 posts

201 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Was trawling through the PH Classifieds and noticed you can buy a year old new Aston Martin Cygnet for £18.5k from an Aston Dealership.

http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...

Now this got me thinking. Would I rather have this over a new MINI Cooper which costs roughly the same.

Just to be different I would get the Cygnet (prepares to be shot down in flames).

irob

121 posts

177 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
It's the logical choice. Go for it.

Krikkit

27,920 posts

208 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
They look fantastic, and I bet that leather-clad cabin feels brilliant. Were it branded properly I'd say do it, but buying that supports the smearing of a fine motoring name. :\

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

282 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Glovebox panel looks like it is about to give way. hehe

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

193 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
If you're buying it to tell the guys down the pub you've got an Aston, then fair enough (though never offer to give them a lift home).
Otherwise, buy the MINI, it's the better car.

R11ysf

1,967 posts

209 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Mini is a miles better car. Any what is a "year old new Aston"?? It's a year and a bit old with 9k miles on it, or second hand is another way of putting it. It's depreciated by a third in it's first year because they never had any underlying demand for them, purely a CO2 exercise.
On the other hand my mate had an IQ and it is a very good car, but for a year old it would be half the cygnet. £9k is a lot of extra cash just so you ass can sit on cow hide!

Mark Benson

8,264 posts

296 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Glovebox panel looks like it is about to give way. hehe
That's because someone's hung their handbag on it smile

RacingBlue

1,455 posts

191 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Neither.

Bill

58,219 posts

282 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
I'd get an IQ and a toy of some description.

Anyway, why does a small car with nearly 100bhp and a manual box take 12 seconds to get to 60?

DaveH23

3,355 posts

197 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
A new IQ can be had from £10,995 save yourself £8k, using these saving buy some aston badges - these badges will cost you the 8k difference if you get them from AM or about £1.99 from halfords.

Job Jobbed.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

282 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Bill said:
I'd get an IQ and a toy of some description.

Anyway, why does a small car with nearly 100bhp and a manual box take 12 seconds to get to 60?
It does seem very slow, but they weigh a ton (quite literaly). Not sure how they managed to make it quite so heavy when the Smart is over 250kg lighter.

matt21

4,379 posts

231 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Not that cheap, it's nearer two years old.

Negative Creep

26,002 posts

254 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
R11ysf said:
Mini is a miles better car. Any what is a "year old new Aston"?? It's a year and a bit old with 9k miles on it, or second hand is another way of putting it. It's depreciated by a third in it's first year because they never had any underlying demand for them, purely a CO2 exercise.
On the other hand my mate had an IQ and it is a very good car, but for a year old it would be half the cygnet. £9k is a lot of extra cash just so you ass can sit on cow hide!
They don't sell enough cars to be bound by the CO2 averages, so they can't even use that excuse

Pints

18,451 posts

221 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Glovebox panel looks like it is about to give way. hehe
yes
It looks seriously abused.

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

193 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
They don't sell enough cars to be bound by the CO2 averages, so they can't even use that excuse
Is that true? I presumed that was the major reason for doing it. The only other reason being that their customers wanted something smaller for city driving.

matt21

4,379 posts

231 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
mnkiboy said:
s that true? I presumed that was the major reason for doing it. The only other reason being that their customers wanted something smaller for city driving.
I heard it was a co2 exercise which ultimately failed due to the too close affiliation with Toyota. Ultimately there was an item within the product which was not differentiated to a significant enough degree to warrant co2 benefit for AM.

Someone was fired.

frp0092

37 posts

232 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
It always surprises me that a car this size needs parking distance control!

:J:

2,593 posts

252 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
They don't sell enough cars to be bound by the CO2 averages, so they can't even use that excuse
The averages are for everyone, doesn't matter how many cars you sell smile

If you sell less than 10k and aren't associated to another manufacturer, you still have to get the omissions down.

Bill

58,219 posts

282 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
:J: said:
The averages are for everyone, doesn't matter how many cars you sell smile

If you sell less than 10k and aren't associated to another manufacturer, you still have to get the omissions down.
yes The EU hates it when stuff gets left out.




Sorry

MrFrodo

21,549 posts

269 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
matt21 said:
mnkiboy said:
s that true? I presumed that was the major reason for doing it. The only other reason being that their customers wanted something smaller for city driving.
I heard it was a co2 exercise which ultimately failed due to the too close affiliation with Toyota. Ultimately there was an item within the product which was not differentiated to a significant enough degree to warrant co2 benefit for AM.

Someone was fired.
That sounds familiar. I believe it was originally CO2 motivated but subsequently backfired.

FWIW, I'd be straight in with a MINI Goodwood if I wanted a really posh supermini. We're not far off seeing V8 Vantages for new Cygnet money.