BMW - Runflats
Author
Discussion

boothy1987

Original Poster:

223 posts

169 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Can you put conventional tyres on a 5 series BMW (2007) that was originally on runflats?

And is there an issue with the fronts being standard tyres and the rears being runflats? I assume the ride and maybe handling with be compromised in some way

slowx

325 posts

180 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
boothy1987 said:
Can you put conventional tyres on a 5 series BMW (2007) that was originally on runflats?

....
Yes

chrisx666

808 posts

290 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
boothy1987 said:
Can you put conventional tyres on a 5 series BMW (2007) that was originally on runflats?

And is there an issue with the fronts being standard tyres and the rears being runflats? I assume the ride and maybe handling with be compromised in some way
Yes, but change all 4 if you are going to do it. IMO of course. A space saver spare kit off ebay would also be a good idea.

Prof Prolapse

16,163 posts

219 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Christ I've got two cars on runflats and I'm not sure if "compromised" is the word I'd use. They're bloody horrible.

Kev T360

366 posts

180 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
We had run flats on our MINI, changed them to normal tyres (mid range) and it made the car alot nicer to drive, cheaper too! All you need to remember is you have no spare in the boot, so at least have a can of that tyre weld stuff.

T1berious

2,669 posts

184 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
I had the same issue on our E92, was hoping to get some non run flats and was told all sorts (Wheel lip is longer, suspension different etc) but lots of Z4 owners move from Run flats to non Vreds Sessanta's with no issues.

However, after having a blowout at 70 and barely noticing apart from a massive bang, we've kept them on.


Shed01

51 posts

259 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Be a bit careful as I have heard rumour that it could be considered a mod by your insurance co if the car was meant to have runflats, and they may not pay out if you have an accident and you've not told them you've modified your car. Let me be clear though that i've no solid proof that that's the case, but knowing insurance co's...

Jonnas

1,004 posts

192 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
I've got runflats on the front and non-runflats on the back of my 330i and I am still alive!! I am still yet to hear of a valid reason why it is in anyway dangerous to mix and match in that way as long as they are in pairs.

I'll change the fronts to non-runflats when they need changing and I have a can of tyre goo and a pump in the boot for the rears.

Prof Prolapse

16,163 posts

219 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Shed01 said:
Be a bit careful as I have heard rumour that it could be considered a mod by your insurance co if the car was meant to have runflats, and they may not pay out if you have an accident and you've not told them you've modified your car. Let me be clear though that i've no solid proof that that's the case, but knowing insurance co's...
Pretty confident this isn't the case. Or at least that the onus would be on an insurance company to demonstrate why they were a contributory factor to your accident. Which would be borderline impossible.

Otherwise they'd be in the awkward position where they'd need to specify approved brands etc.




Monty Python

4,813 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
Pretty confident this isn't the case. Or at least that the onus would be on an insurance company to demonstrate why they were a contributory factor to your accident. Which would be borderline impossible.

Otherwise they'd be in the awkward position where they'd need to specify approved brands etc.
The advice I was given was to check - it seems every company has a different view and it's not worth the risk of having them wriggle out of a claim because you didn't inform them. LV they said there wouldn't increase the premium but they'd make a note of it.

SWoll

22,793 posts

287 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Have run non RFT's on the rear and RFT's on the front of a 2008 E61 for 12 months without issue. Will finally be changing the fronts to non RFT's next month as they have finally worn out.

The difference in ride quality is simply astonishing.

Agree on the insurance comment, worth letting them know as it would be a "modification from standard". Made no difference to the premium.

Edited by SWoll on Thursday 29th November 13:12

monthefish

20,467 posts

260 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
T1berious said:
I had the same issue on our E92, was hoping to get some non run flats and was told all sorts (Wheel lip is longer, suspension different etc) but lots of Z4 owners move from Run flats to non Vreds Sessanta's with no issues.

However, after having a blowout at 70 and barely noticing apart from a massive bang, we've kept them on.
What was the cause of your blowout?

V8s ONLY

266 posts

227 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
If mixing runflats and non runflats,the runflats should be on the rear.You can get a sudden oversteer situation if the other way around due to the softer construction of non runflats.

Prof Prolapse

16,163 posts

219 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Nah, not something I'd report and, whilst I agree with declaring actual modifications, I don't think it's a precedent we should be keen to set.

The fact it's run flats or not doesn't have any intrinsic detrimental effects. Same as changing tyre brands or replacing shocks or brake components to similar spec ones.

IMO, you just use common sense with regards to advising your insurer. The spirit of the question is that it will affect the car performance or it's value, neither of those is measurably affected in this case. Of course they'll "write it down" if you ask though.

Just my two pence of course.


boothy1987

Original Poster:

223 posts

169 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
V8s ONLY said:
If mixing runflats and non runflats,the runflats should be on the rear.You can get a sudden oversteer situation if the other way around due to the softer construction of non runflats.
Yep, it's the fronts i'm changing so that's fortunate

ThunderSpook

3,908 posts

240 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
My BMW dealer mentioned to me about the lip in the wheels being designed for runflats so you run the risk of non runflats popping off the rim. I wasn't buying tyres at the time so they had no reason to lie to me.

I've never driven my car without runflats. The thing with tyres is it's not like you can just try them out for a couple of days to see if you like them and then give them back if you don't, it's shelling out £700 for what could be no difference.

boothy1987

Original Poster:

223 posts

169 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
ThunderSpook said:
My BMW dealer mentioned to me about the lip in the wheels being designed for runflats so you run the risk of non runflats popping off the rim. I wasn't buying tyres at the time so they had no reason to lie to me.

I've never driven my car without runflats. The thing with tyres is it's not like you can just try them out for a couple of days to see if you like them and then give them back if you don't, it's shelling out £700 for what could be no difference.
When you put the reg number into these tyre websites, it includes all standard tyres as being suitable for the car. How reliable that is I don't know

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
ThunderSpook said:
My BMW dealer mentioned to me about the lip in the wheels being designed for runflats so you run the risk of non runflats popping off the rim. I wasn't buying tyres at the time so they had no reason to lie to me.

I've never driven my car without runflats. The thing with tyres is it's not like you can just try them out for a couple of days to see if you like them and then give them back if you don't, it's shelling out £700 for what could be no difference.
This is completely incorrect, there is no risk of a non run flat tyre popping out of a runflat rim due to the rim construction.
Rims designed for runflat tyres should have an extended hump on the inside of the bead, this is to hold the tyre in place when deflated, the majority of modern rims will have a hump anyway although it may not be a large, rims with this hump are some time known as safety rims, as they were designed to stop the tyre separating from the rim during a blow out, and this dates back to well before there even were run flat tyres as we know them now

jon-

16,534 posts

245 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
ging84 said:
ThunderSpook said:
My BMW dealer mentioned to me about the lip in the wheels being designed for runflats so you run the risk of non runflats popping off the rim. I wasn't buying tyres at the time so they had no reason to lie to me.

I've never driven my car without runflats. The thing with tyres is it's not like you can just try them out for a couple of days to see if you like them and then give them back if you don't, it's shelling out £700 for what could be no difference.
This is completely incorrect, there is no risk of a non run flat tyre popping out of a runflat rim due to the rim construction.
Rims designed for runflat tyres should have an extended hump on the inside of the bead, this is to hold the tyre in place when deflated, the majority of modern rims will have a hump anyway although it may not be a large, rims with this hump are some time known as safety rims, as they were designed to stop the tyre separating from the rim during a blow out, and this dates back to well before there even were run flat tyres as we know them now
Ging is spot on.

I read loads of review from people who've switched from runflats on 3s and 5s and everyone comments on how much the ride and grip improves.

The only negative is not having a spare if you get a flat.

philmots

4,665 posts

289 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
With regards to them being classed as a mod..

I'm swapping RFTS off my 335d to Hankook Evo 2's. I'm insured with Swiftcover (Axa group) and I've had it in writing off them that they've no issue with me using non-runflat tyres.


My father has a 120d with RFTS and he contacted Shiela's Wheels and they class them as a modification that they have to know about and charge accordingly!