More clueless driving test interfering - discuss
More clueless driving test interfering - discuss
Author
Discussion

mat777

Original Poster:

10,714 posts

190 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
I noticed this earlier:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2254667/...


Ignoring the fact that its yet another "ditzy cow who obviously cant drive crashes car, now thinks everyone should suffer with more testing" story, is this a good or bad idea? I am in 2 minds:

Good idea: people get experience in how easy it is to crash, and therefore may drive more safely, without having a crash IRL

Bad idea: why is it needed? Only drive as fast as you can see to stop! And life is nothing like what looks to be a very poor computer simulation (judging from the screenshot)

Raize

1,476 posts

209 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
I would

1878

824 posts

193 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Better idea - ignore the Daily Malice?

Raize

1,476 posts

209 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Yeah and driving is nothing like racing games. I can drift round the local equivalent of B-roads in Hawaii in my Esprit in TDU2 easily without hitting people but try that for real... lol smash.

mat777

Original Poster:

10,714 posts

190 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
1878 said:
Better idea - ignore the Daily Malice?
its not so much the daily mail ditzy driver sob story I was concentrating on, more the fact that this scheme has been rolled out and is evidently gaining ground round the country. FFS my test 3 years ago seemed perfectly fair as it was. Perhaps if people used some common sense for once and though "i'm not terribly confident, so i'll have a few more lessons" instead of "i'm not terribly confident, but I'll go out anyway and become an enormous hazard", then we wouldnt be in this situaiton

4key

12,112 posts

178 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Whatever rubbish simulator they have is going to be nothing in comparison to the multi million pound stuff that people play online every day.

New drivers know what happens when they crash, if they havent been playing games there are many youtube videos that they are probably aware of.

Training is not the biggest issue in young road deaths.

Horse Pop

685 posts

174 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
This isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Has anyone had a look at the software?

Apparently the hazard perception test is not effective but maybe this is more like it?


mat777 said:
Perhaps if people used some common sense for once and though "i'm not terribly confident, so i'll have a few more lessons" instead of "i'm not terribly confident, but I'll go out anyway and become an enormous hazard", then we wouldnt be in this situaiton
http://www.hhs.gov/opa/familylife/tech_assistance/etraining/adolescent_brain/Development/prefrontal_cortex/

Some web page said:
This brain region gives an individual the capacity to exercise “good judgment” when presented with difficult life situations. Brain research indicating that brain development is not complete until near the age of 25, refers specifically to the development of the prefrontal cortex.
I read that the bit of ones brain that one would use to make this kind of decision isn't fully formed until the age of 25 so perhaps people who have just passed their test aren't best qualified to decide this?

Edited by Horse Pop on Sunday 30th December 01:20

nephilim

110 posts

166 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Hazard perception was a joke when I took it, you literally have to spot the hazard within half a second or you fail that clip...and when you look everywhere, there are an awful lot of hazards to see but only one is the correct one.

As for this test, if it was around when I was taking my test, then I would have laughed it off. No simulator in the world will ever replace the real action of sitting behind the wheel.

Raize

1,476 posts

209 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
mat777 said:
Perhaps if people used some common sense for once and though "i'm not terribly confident, so i'll have a few more lessons" instead of "i'm not terribly confident, but I'll go out anyway and become an enormous hazard", then we wouldnt be in this situaiton
The waiting lists of 4+ months on practical tests are a bit of an issue regarding this.

Speed addicted

6,329 posts

257 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
So young people take more risks with less training than older people with more training.
This is news?

As others have said it's not like the possibility of crashing and dying is unknown, it's the fact that no-one thinks it'll happen to them. I certainly didn't!

RJP001

1,175 posts

180 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Speed addicted said:
As others have said it's not like the possibility of crashing and dying is unknown, it's the fact that no-one thinks it'll happen to them. I certainly didn't!
And it looks like you were right, unless you've typed that from the next world. biglaugh

danjama

5,728 posts

172 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Raize said:
I would
brilliant

Pistom

6,422 posts

189 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
danjama said:
Raize said:
I would
brilliant
Really not my type but even with my low standards I'd say no thanks. Very tempted to make some further comments in bad taste but for once can't bring myself to.

m8rky

2,090 posts

189 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Why left hand drive?

TheTurbonator

2,792 posts

181 months

Sunday 30th December 2012
quotequote all
Daily Wail said:
Thankfully, for you, or your children, it’s not yet too late.