An excellent idea for road safety
An excellent idea for road safety

Poll: An excellent idea for road safety

Total Members Polled: 184

I'm over 25 its a great idea: 38%
I'm under 25 its a great idea: 4%
I'm over 25 its a terrible idea: 36%
I'm under 25 its a terrible idea: 22%
Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Some folk said:
A road safety group today called for restrictions on newly-qualified drivers in a bid to cut road deaths.

A “graduated” driving licence could mean new drivers being limited to the times they can drive, restricted on how many passengers they can carry and subject to tougher drink drive laws.

Mark McDonald said figures showed 17 to 25-year-olds are most likely to be in a fatal collision during the festive break. He said: “Sadly, the party season raises the numbers of people getting behind the wheel under the influence of alcohol. Not only that, but the road conditions can be extremely dangerous – particularly for new drivers who are not used to it.

“Moving to graduated licences – such as making limitations on driving between 11pm and 4am, a zero 
blood-alcohol limit and restrictions on passenger numbers – could cut road deaths and may even boost insurance prospects for young drivers.

“Although we know deaths on UK’s roads are down by 11 per cent, it is still the case that young drivers – who are the group most likely to have newly qualified – remain substantially more likely to be involved in a road accident.

“If there is anything we can do to reduce their chances of being in an accident, we must do it
So what are your thoughts about this

Also a poll broken up for age groups

kambites

71,550 posts

251 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
I'd like to see a graduated system, but I'm not convinced that those are the correct criteria to grade on.

obob

4,193 posts

224 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
How are they going to enforce it?

Car and Brew

9 posts

166 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
I'd like to see a graduated system, but I'm not convinced that those are the correct criteria to grade on.
have to agree with this. When i was in 6th form and passed my test i seemed to be one of only a handful of people who didn't have some form of accident.

Terminator X

20,751 posts

234 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Waste of time, effort, resources etc. Accidents happen just get over it.

TX.

orangesrule

1,946 posts

178 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
I don't think a graduated licence is a terrible idea; however as someone has mentioned, implementation and execution would be the main sticking point.

But tbh, i doubt much would change anyway with the numbers of traffic officers/general police at this present time.

The main thing is drink driving, i never drink and drive, what's the point in only having half a pint; i'd rather have nothing. but i expect many people would disagree with me on that.

PHmember

2,487 posts

201 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
I think you should have restricted engine sizes for new drivers & only be able to increase the engine size after a certain amount of time with a full licence - a bit like with bikes.

kambites

71,550 posts

251 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
orangesrule said:
The main thing is drink driving,
That's perhaps true around the new-year, but if you mean generally I disagree. Drink driving receives massive focus in exactly the same way that speeding does, and for largely the same reasons - it's an easy target.

There are far more important places to focus, IMO.

eliotrw

309 posts

199 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
I would be quite rightly pissed if this happened when i was younger.
Im a far better driver than most of the 40 years floating at 71mph in the right hand lane :/
I.E its a load of rubbish.
Either included night and motorway driving as pre test criteria in way similar to pilots licenses or dont bother.

To elaborate I think it would be best if learners racked up 5 hours motorway and 5 hours nightdriving before a test. As opposed to limiting them to daytime only.

Kong

1,503 posts

201 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Waste of time, effort, resources etc. Accidents happen just get over it.

TX.
I agree, just make the driving test more relevant for a start - much easier.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Waste of time, effort, resources etc. Accidents happen just get over it.

TX.
Most that end up in a tree at 2am while pissed have probably broken the law already

orangesrule

1,946 posts

178 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
PHmember said:
I think you should have restricted engine sizes for new drivers & only be able to increase the engine size after a certain amount of time with a full licence - a bit like with bikes.
Thing is insurance is already a major restriction on the amount of power you can have under your right foot these days. You can still do a lot of damage/kill yourself and others with 60bhp.

Anything with much less power that weighs around a ton, i would consider to be dangerous, in terms of acceleration (ie slipways ect)

Edited by orangesrule on Monday 31st December 18:14

Jandywa

1,120 posts

181 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Engine size is pretty much already restricted by the insurers for younger drivers.
Anything much over 1.4 litres and you may aswell hand you pants over to the insurance company.

BFG TERRANO

2,172 posts

178 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
The black box idea is good. Also "pay as you go" insurance worked out from the black box using things like erratic driving and times the car is used are a great idea.

Just this year (again) teenagers killed over Christmas driving like tw@ts near me.

West4x4

672 posts

202 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
but what if you pass at 26? surely a restriction on the first year or 2 of driving would be better. Or maybe a system where you pass get a year with restrictions and then do a retest or refresher before being given a full license

The Big G

1,004 posts

198 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Surely limiting the number of passengers etc, that are currently in place in northern ireland would make more of a difference. Does anyone know their road death/injury figures compaires to the mainland?

I dont think restricting times of travel would work very well as many under 25s will need to be able to commute around the clock.

ambuletz

11,761 posts

211 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
silly idea, not all youngesters are dangerous drivers, some are very sensible. Find out why some are wreckless and find a way to slap them round the head until they realise the responsiblity they have getting behiind a wheel.

interloper

2,747 posts

285 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Some folk said:
“Moving to graduated licences – such as making limitations on driving between 11pm and 4am, a zero 
blood-alcohol limit and restrictions on passenger numbers – could cut road deaths and may even boost insurance prospects for young drivers.

“If there is anything we can do to reduce their chances of being in an accident, we must do it
I just don't like this line of thinking, sure its sad that a few youngsters die each year but is it really necessary to ruin driving for the rest of them?

Lowering the blood alcohol limit is pretty pointless, best concentrate on catching those way over the current limit really?

As for a curfew on night driving, one of the things I enjoyed as a teenager was driving around with friends in the car late at night. Seems a shame to rob a generation of this basic pleasure.

I guess the thing that bugs me is when I was starting to drive about 3000 people died a year on the roads, we have now got down to about 2000 people. Seems like a massive improvement, sure it can be improved but if its going to cost large numbers of people their personal freedom then is it really worth it? I don't think so.


anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
Number of people in a car is something to look at, but I don't think the time of day is. Besides, people may need to drive at night for work.

My ideas are this:

1. A stricter driving test with a bigger emphasis on how a car can lose control, and what to do when its out of control would help a lot.
2. Take really cheap tyres that we would call ditch finders off the market.
3. Add motorway education and motorway driving to the test.
4. Improve cats eyes on the roads before adding more cameras. I see a lot of speed cameras on roads that are extremely poorly lit.

I still think that some young people are dying in survivable accidents because they are forced into cheap cars with poor safety as the cost of insurance is so high. How many 17/18 year olds come on PH with a budget of £4k and have to blow 2/3 of it on insurance instead of spending it on a newer and safer car?

dcb

6,068 posts

295 months

Monday 31st December 2012
quotequote all
I suggest looking at what happens in similar countries in Europe
and cherry pick the bits that work best.

There is no real need to invent a whole new strategy from first principles.

Also looking at how new bikers are administered would be helpful too.