The thing that worries me about Porsches is...
The thing that worries me about Porsches is...
Author
Discussion

pentoman

Original Poster:

4,834 posts

285 months

Thursday 9th September 2004
quotequote all
that most models seem to have their little 'issues' or worries. The recent 996 engine blowup discussion got me thinking about this.

Aren't they supposed to be reliable? (Sorry to sound like an idiot there). I guess they may be no less reliable than a BMW, but the problem is if something does go it might well be extraordinarily expensive.

If it's a design flaw, then I can live with it in a Ford...

Feel like you could say 'the hell with it' and just get a Ferrari instead?


Even the thought of owning a 968 gets my wallet trembling for the inevitable 'oh yeah, that happens on that model'. Great.

Russ
'86 190E, '62 Elan

poorcardealer

8,628 posts

263 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all


They are getting that way.........air conditioning on the late cars seems a weak point as well as engine problems..........I think on the earlier cars you expect a certain amount of tinkering, however I must admit I now find it a little tiresome allways having to repair something, or if not Im waiting for something to go wrong. (ala Jaguar feeling !!)

Glenn McMenamin

2,305 posts

260 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
I know what you are saying here guys, but i don't think this is just a Porsche problem.

Aswell as my GT3 and Turbo (no problems so far ) I have an AMG Merc, which has had more than its fair share of visits to the Garage for various seals electrical and computer problems.

Ontop of this, My brothers new shape BMW 745i has been shockingly unreliable due to the engine failing and various other electrical faults.

Maybe isolated cases i Know, but not what you'd expect from two of the worlds other leading car manufacturers either !!

superlightr

12,920 posts

285 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
Ive had only 2 minor thing with my 996 is 2 years. (glove box & faulty warning light)
I had umpteen major probs with an M5 in 6 months.


I would get another 996 again.

shadowninja

79,207 posts

304 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
That's why I got a TVR. At least you expect things to go wrong.

944doc

1,550 posts

261 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
pentoman said:


Even the thought of owning a 968 gets my wallet trembling for the inevitable 'oh yeah, that happens on that model'. Great.

Russ
'86 190E, '62 Elan


granted many of the porsche line up have their foibles but they are in general extraordinarily well engineered, hence their longevity. Many of these threads are about 944s, 968s, early 911s and 964s, most of which are over a decade (or two) old and still beating the pants off many modern challengers.

The key as always is in how well the car has been looked after, not mileage or age. My 944 is now 16 years old and totally useable, great fun to drive, practical, and it cost me 4 grand. I challenge you to find better performance/value for money anywhere.

with regard to the 968 it is a SUPERB car, combining practicality with frightening performance (OK you GT3 guys, I'm talking relative here) and peerless road manners. They stopped making them at the L/M reg so they are all at least 10-11 years old. The only serious major issue is with timing belts breaking, ruining the camshafts, or camshaft teeth breaking, but provided the servicing schedules are adhered to, this happens once in a blue moon. Even if it does, a competent specialist will drop in a pair of new cams for about £1.5K. So you get a galvanised body, bomb proof build, stunning performance and everyday useability for about 12-14K and a worst case scenario is that you might spend a grand or two on new camshafts if God really hates you. Buy any new car with comparable performance and you will lose as much in depreciation the moment you leave the dealer.

My advice is chill out and take these threads with a pinch of salt. And dont go anywhere near an old ferrari if you want reliability. Buy a really well looked after 968 with a huge service history file, enjoy overtaking just about everybody, whoop with joy as you go round tight corners like a scalextric car, placate your other half, if you have one, by fitting two small children in the back and 2 weeks shopping in the capacious boot, and smile every year as your mates take a 2-3grand hit in depreciation and you dont!

Glenn McMenamin

2,305 posts

260 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
944,

Some good points made there.

Certainly agree that the 968 is nothing but a Gem in terms of value and fun etc.

I wouldn't touch an older Ferrari, as i don't think my bank balance could take the hit !!!


G.

roygarth

2,674 posts

270 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
Glenn McMenamin said:

As well as my GT3 and Turbo (no problems so far ) I have an AMG Merc


Nice collection Glen....what sort of 'transport' do you 'direct'...bolivian marching powder?

Glenn McMenamin

2,305 posts

260 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all


Nice collection Glen....what sort of 'transport' do you 'direct'...bolivian marching powder?

No.......but i do Direct a lot of Transport !!!!

iguana

7,281 posts

282 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
Well ref the Ford comment, I'd go so far as to say in build quality or more specifically new car reliability terms, a Focus is now better built than the majority of Mercs- which used to be absolutly built out of granite & iron girders, but now are built from playdough & plastic & now have more electronics than the space shuttle & have an absolutely woeful new car reliability record, & Porker build quality is also not a patch on what it used to be either.

Ref the 968, I really wouldnt worry, as with the exception of the cam teeth issue they are amongst the best built porkers there are. Sure given high miles there are a few issues but all these are obious to a good specialist as are the cams- they only need a quick look at to check & as long as you budget for these then no probs.


Thom

1,740 posts

269 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
In addition to increased cam sprocket wear, 968s seem to suffer from gear box failures ... see here

I'd have a 944 S2 over a 968 any day, but then I'm biased

lightweight

1,165 posts

270 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
My porsche Experence is limited I have only ever had water cooled cars 968,996 & 996 + breif flirtation with boxter and Cyanne but each has done over 17K miles a year with only relativly minor problems what evryone tends to forget is that we are all enthusiasts so tend to know a lot more than the average punter because we are passionate about the things we sit on chat rooms and talk about cars for gods sake . If we were on a Rover forum (heven help us) I am sure we would all know about all of there defects. The Car trade always has a dodgy side always will. How many VW golf drivers know that the first MkIV GTI's they drive is likley to be built in south africa with inferiour underseal and paint. How many people who drive a RHD merc circa 1997 know how many 2 year old cars were brought back from asia where they were unsold and sold in the UK as new!!
Dont forget porsche are still the only manufacturer of a practical everyday supercar
Gospal acording to St Porc

>> Edited by lightweight on Friday 10th September 14:34

turbobloke

115,399 posts

282 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
Always seemed like a good idea to go for 'last of line' for any particular variant of the 911, and not jump in as soon as the next incarnation emerges if you want to buy new. Probably true for other Porsches.

If the factory have ironed out the early production problems, and a previous owner has also paid the emotional and financial price for sorting any remaining niggles, pre-owned late cars can be even better. By-product - you don't get the same VAT hit and instant depreciation woes, however small. Downside - not getting a virgin car built to your ideal spec, factory collection etc.

With so many 911s and Boxsters around these days, it's not difficult to get as close as dammit on the spec.

vario-rob

3,034 posts

270 months

Saturday 11th September 2004
quotequote all
I shouldn’t tempt fate but my 993 in the three years I’ve had her has had not one single thing go wrong with her. Utterly faultless in every way, boring really.

Compare that to the heinous plastic pig of a Cerbera which at no stage ever worked properly, the 993 has been the perfect antidote.

I know you can’t really compare but I use a Landcruiser Amazon for work a vehicle which by most peoples reckoning is one of the best made and indeed over engineered cars you can buy. That has been in to the garage twice in a couple of months and is only just over a year old. Not the 993 though

mx5alive

1,442 posts

282 months

Sunday 12th September 2004
quotequote all
Guys, As a prospective 928 owner this thread is making me feel slightly wobbly. All this talk of fault, breakdowns and known problems.

Seriously though, I've considered the downside and chatted to quite a few owners who feel that they're no worse than any similar aged car with similar performance abilities. Part of the appeal to me is that if I buy the right car, look after it correctly and learn to deal with any possible faults early then i'm not going to be seriously more out of pocket than buying a new, though lesser performing car and suffering the mass depreciation that new cars all have. The upside is that i'm going to have an automotive dream for my pride and joy.

I'm itching to find the right one and get it on my drive just so I can enjoy it.

>> Edited by mx5alive on Sunday 12th September 16:44

pentoman

Original Poster:

4,834 posts

285 months

Monday 13th September 2004
quotequote all
Is it true to say Porsche's part costs are pretty high though?

If a cambelt/chain went on a 928, would it cost more to fix than the cam chain going on a similarly priced 500SL? Assuming versions with the same number of valves and the same damaged caused etc.

Russ

williamp

20,077 posts

295 months

Monday 13th September 2004
quotequote all
mx5alive said:
Guys, As a prospective 928 owner this thread is making me feel slightly wobbly. All this talk of fault, breakdowns and known problems.

Seriously though, I've considered the downside and chatted to quite a few owners who feel that they're no worse than any similar aged car with similar performance abilities. Part of the appeal to me is that if I buy the right car, look after it correctly and learn to deal with any possible faults early then i'm not going to be seriously more out of pocket than buying a new, though lesser performing car and suffering the mass depreciation that new cars all have. The upside is that i'm going to have an automotive dream for my pride and joy.

I'm itching to find the right one and get it on my drive just so I can enjoy it.

>> Edited by mx5alive on Sunday 12th September 16:44


Exactly. they are no worse then any other. Porsche have the reputation for reliability because, for their performance they are very well built and reliable. But just remember that storming away from the lights upto 160- mph ands then braking hard for a tight slalom will put a lot of stress on the car. They can take it more then other cars (of similar performance and price) but they will still be unreliable if miss-treated.

Also remember that people only talk when they have a problem. No-one has written "6 months without a serious breakdown", but they will write if they have a breakdown. Does this make sense??

Anyhow, last weekend I finished rebuilding my engine after my head gasket started to go. Unreliable? Hardly, the head gasket was 15 years and 119,000 miles old...

Find a good'un, and a Porsche will look after you

turbobloke

115,399 posts

282 months

Monday 13th September 2004
quotequote all
williamp said:
Find a good'un, and a Porsche will look after you
Yes find a good'un and scratch that itch