MOT Break Test Results - Please Explain These Results

MOT Break Test Results - Please Explain These Results

Author
Discussion

EViS

Original Poster:

393 posts

164 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
I received the brake test results from my MOT Test. However, I haven't ever paid attention to these and don't have a clue what anything here means and whether it's good or bad. Can anyone please enlighten me what I should be looking for and what the figure means in reality?


paintman

7,692 posts

191 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
The figures given for each wheel show the maximum resistance offered to the rolling road powered rollers by the cars braking system immediately before the tyre slips on the roller - which would be the brake locking the wheel. That is also noted.
The wheels are tested individually & then as an axle pair.
The figures are usually different between offside and nearside due to the weight of the tester who is sitting in the car whilst operating the rolling road. This is normal.
Link to the testers manual for you:
http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_370.htm
Read through the link & its subsequent pages, you might find just how low the braking efficiency can legally be something of a surprise. In your case - dual line system with Parking Brake acting on the rear wheels - the service brake (footbrake) min is 50% & parking brake (handbrake) min is 16% so yours are well over.


Edited by paintman on Thursday 10th January 15:45

EViS

Original Poster:

393 posts

164 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Thank you for the reply. Will read though the manual to get some more info smile.

If the service break and parking break figures were below 50% and 16% respectively, what could the cause of this be? Worn break bads, discs, overly stretched parking break cable?

Magic919

14,126 posts

202 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Brake!

one eyed mick

1,189 posts

162 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
I would be wondering why it doesent turn sharp right when braking !!!!as to parts /components pretty much all BRAKE parts

EViS

Original Poster:

393 posts

164 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Magic919 said:
Brake!
Oh bugger, pet hate of mine when people get things like this wrong smile. At least the typo only exists in the title wink.

EViS

Original Poster:

393 posts

164 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
one eyed mick said:
I would be wondering why it doesent turn sharp right when braking !!!!as to parts /components pretty much all BRAKE parts
Not quite sure I follow you here mate?

Magic919

14,126 posts

202 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
EViS said:
Thank you for the reply. Will read though the manual to get some more info smile.

If the service break and parking break figures were below 50% and 16% respectively, what could the cause of this be? Worn break bads, discs, overly stretched parking break cable?
Not just the title!

one eyed mick

1,189 posts

162 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
EViS said:
Not quite sure I follow you here mate?
Because of the imbalance between fr and fl brakes !

EViS

Original Poster:

393 posts

164 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
one eyed mick said:
Because of the imbalance between fr and fl brakes !
Is this not a result of the tester sitting in the car (as per paintman's reply)?

paintman

7,692 posts

191 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Read the first page of the link.
Imbalance is measured when BOTH wheels on an axle are being powered by the RBT & its this that determines pass or fail, after first establishing that the individual wheel brakes are functioning.
As you can see from the manual, what you are looking for is that the braking forces on both wheels increase at about the same rate as the brakes are applied gradually without causing a wheel to lock & that when gradually released they decrease at about the same rate.
Maximum permitted variation is 25% at any time during the increase in application on the steered road wheels.


Edited by paintman on Wednesday 9th January 00:11

stevieturbo

17,270 posts

248 months

Saturday 26th January 2013
quotequote all
Those numbers dont make any sense.

an 11% imbalance is 372 vs 532, and a 24% imbalance for 270 vs 263 ?

yet the next line states 1% imbalance for 223 vs 246 ?

No matter what maths is being used, there doesnt seem to be any consistency there ?