Car Seat Law Question
Author
Discussion

jbsportstech

Original Poster:

5,069 posts

209 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Now I thought I had researched this but an avon and somerset officer happened to park next to me in tescos. Wasn't traffic and was very nice and polite. However he made comment to my 5 year old sat in front passenger seat and stated that no one under 135cm should be sat in front high back booster or not. He had to wait till his own son grew to 135cm before placing him in the front.

I have checked online and my understanding is if they are over 3 years old they can sit in the front subject to being in a suitable child restraint.

TA14

14,332 posts

288 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
This would tend to suggest that the policeman needs to read up a little:
http://www.childcarseats.org.uk/law/index.htm#kids...

cailean

917 posts

203 months

AlexKing

613 posts

188 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
As others have said, said officer is talking out of his hindquarters. I've been carting my little one around in the front of the MX5 since she was a few weeks old. You're an idiot if you do so without making sure the airbag is deactivated first, but even that's not actually illegal under motoring law.

Lanby

1,106 posts

244 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
If I read the rules correctly, I am allowed to put our 18 month old in a forward facing child seat in the front seat. If I do is the airbag supposed to stay active?

AlexKing

613 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Lanby said:
If I read the rules correctly, I am allowed to put our 18 month old in a forward facing child seat in the front seat. If I do is the airbag supposed to stay active?
You are allowed to, and the airbag should be off. That is, unless you really want a blind toddler.

Bill

58,741 posts

285 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
AlexKing said:
You are allowed to, and the airbag should be off. That is, unless you really want a blind toddler.
Not convinced, and neither are the AA. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/child_safety/...

smartphone hater

4,286 posts

173 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Bill said:
Not convinced, and neither are the AA. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/child_safety/...
I think the AA agree with him. From your link. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/child_safety/...

williredale

2,866 posts

182 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Both of my daughters have been in the front of my MGB GT in both rear and front facing car seats. Actually they've both been driven in it far more than my wife has. Policeman was talking bks.

TA14

14,332 posts

288 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Bill said:
AlexKing said:
You are allowed to, and the airbag should be off. That is, unless you really want a blind toddler.
Not convinced, and neither are the AA. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/child_safety/...
AIUI, I'm with Alex here. You are allowed to and the airbag does not have to be off however most manufacturers (motor vehicle and child seat) recommend that the air abg is switched off so on that basis the air bag should be swithched off; I think it is because infants bodies are not robust enough to resist the force of an air bag.

roystinho

3,767 posts

205 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Using my common sense-onometer I turn the airbag off when Jnr is in the front. My thinking is if we have a bump and the airbag goes off he's likely to get hit in the face by it, however, if its off he's very unlikely to hit the dash like an adult possibly would due to his size and fact he's harnessed in not inertia seatlbelted in.

Daston

6,154 posts

233 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
I had this chat with my wife the other day as I too thought you couldn't have a little one in the front.

She pointed out what would happen if you only had a 2 seater...


Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Note to drivers of MX5 and other 2-seaters. The concept of "front" and "rear" seats may seem curious to you but it is legally defined under Road Traffic Act 1988 and The Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993, as amended.

"Front seat" means a seat which is wholly or partially in the front of the vehicle and “rear seat”, in relation to a vehicle, means any seat which is not a front seat." Well that's not very helpful, but read on...

"Every part of the vehicle forward of the transverse vertical plane passing through the rearmost part of the driver’s seat shall be regarded as the front of the vehicle; and accordingly no part of the vehicle to the rear of that plane shall be regarded as being in the front of the vehicle."

OzOs

jbsportstech

Original Poster:

5,069 posts

209 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
roystinho said:
Using my common sense-onometer I turn the airbag off when Jnr is in the front. My thinking is if we have a bump and the airbag goes off he's likely to get hit in the face by it, however, if its off he's very unlikely to hit the dash like an adult possibly would due to his size and fact he's harnessed in not inertia seatlbelted in.
knew someone who worked for britax training people on correct child seat fitting. Britax have tested vehicles with factory fitted deactivation switches for front passenger air bags and they found in a number of cases the air bags still deployed.

There advice is if a vehicle has front passenger air bag don not install a rear facing infant carrier as the switches are far from full proof.

Bill

58,741 posts

285 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
TA14 said:
Bill said:
AlexKing said:
You are allowed to, and the airbag should be off. That is, unless you really want a blind toddler.
Not convinced, and neither are the AA. http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/child_safety/...
AIUI, I'm with Alex here. You are allowed to and the airbag does not have to be off however most manufacturers (motor vehicle and child seat) recommend that the air abg is switched off so on that basis the air bag should be swithched off; I think it is because infants bodies are not robust enough to resist the force of an air bag.
The AA said:
For forward facing child restraints it is acceptable to leave the airbag active and move the car's seat back on its runners as far as it will go. Do check the car handbook for model specific advice though as airbag size and performance does vary.
I agree you need to mitigate the risk by pushing the seat back and making sure they don't lean forwards or lift their legs, but the "blind toddler - won't someone please think of the children" bit is OTT.

TooLateForAName

4,932 posts

214 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Not really, plenty of evidence of small children being badly injured or killed by airbags.

Bill

58,741 posts

285 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
TooLateForAName said:
Not really, plenty of evidence of small children being badly injured or killed by airbags.
In this country? I've had a quick look and haven't found anything.

Benrad

657 posts

179 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Daston said:
I had this chat with my wife the other day as I too thought you couldn't have a little one in the front.

She pointed out what would happen if you only had a 2 seater...
A antidote to the stupid things the other half said!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Small kids travelling on a front seat certainly need sensible protection and airbag deactivation.

But before getting too excited about a small number of people getting injured by airbags its worth remembering that many, many people have been killed by their seatbelts. Including Princess Diana.

Lanby

1,106 posts

244 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Why does it have to be so bloodly confusing with opposing answers for anything the government does confused

All I wanted to do was put junior up in the front