Motability question
Author
Discussion

englisharcher

Original Poster:

1,607 posts

194 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
I know questions on motability often cause arguments on here, but I have a serious question about it.

Why is a crew cab pick up not available on this scheme?

I'm thinking of something like the Great Wall Steed.

It would carry a family, and has a huge load bed for mobility scooters, wheelchairs and all the other items needed by variously disabled people.

Our Insignia is great for the wife's scooter, but the scooter only just fits in the boot, and the boot can end up dirty if the scooter has to go in wet or dirty.

Do you think a car like this should have a place on the motability scheme?

Cuthbert

29,028 posts

213 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
I wondered this. I was after a Transit and a Kawasaki 1100 stx, very disappointed. About time they got with the 21st century. furious

HTP99

25,316 posts

170 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
It's a commercial vehicle, that's why.

(is this a serious question?)

CYMR0

3,940 posts

230 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
I do see the argument but I suspect that the majority of four-seat pick ups, if offered on that scheme, would be used by builders, farmers, pastry based lock openers, and others who themselves are not disabled (or for the benefit of those who are) and instead would come back with a bazillion miles (clocked back to 30k because whatever), dented, and generally fooked.

The effect of this would be to reduce Motability's goodwill at auction (such as it is, it has a reputaiton that at least some of its cars are well looked after and lightly used) and would certainly cause the cars to depreciate substantially. This might make them unaffordable on the scheme so the point might then become moot.

fjord

2,143 posts

167 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
I think they should do the R1 on the scheme, because it's small, its easier to park in the disabled bay in morrisons.

Cuthbert

29,028 posts

213 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
fjord said:
I think they should do the R1 on the scheme, because it's small, its easier to park in the disabled bay in morrisons.
No reason why not, just fit a wheelchair hoist to the back.

ShampooEfficient

4,278 posts

241 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
Cuthbert said:
fjord said:
I think they should do the R1 on the scheme, because it's small, its easier to park in the disabled bay in morrisons.
No reason why not, just fit a wheelchair hoist to the back.
Mount the trolley on the front of the R1. Obviously.

englisharcher

Original Poster:

1,607 posts

194 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
CYMR0 said:
I do see the argument but I suspect that the majority of four-seat pick ups, if offered on that scheme, would be used by builders, farmers, pastry based lock openers, and others who themselves are not disabled (or for the benefit of those who are) and instead would come back with a bazillion miles (clocked back to 30k because whatever), dented, and generally fooked.

The effect of this would be to reduce Motability's goodwill at auction (such as it is, it has a reputaiton that at least some of its cars are well looked after and lightly used) and would certainly cause the cars to depreciate substantially. This might make them unaffordable on the scheme so the point might then become moot.
Thanks for the sensible answer, you make a very good point, I never considered how abused the scheme could become if they offered them, I was simply thinking about the practicality.

As usual the people that don't understand how the scheme work just post nonsense.

Cuthbert

29,028 posts

213 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
englisharcher said:
just post nonsense.
rofl

rigga

8,806 posts

231 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
We know how it works ..... we also know it gets abused to fk by some people and its being streamlined so that a lot less vehicles are going to be available.

spikeyhead

20,499 posts

227 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
CYMR0 said:
I do see the argument but I suspect that the majority of four-seat pick ups, if offered on that scheme, would be used by builders, farmers, pastry based lock openers, and others who themselves are not disabled (or for the benefit of those who are) and instead would come back with a bazillion miles (clocked back to 30k because whatever), dented, and generally fooked.

The effect of this would be to reduce Motability's goodwill at auction (such as it is, it has a reputaiton that at least some of its cars are well looked after and lightly used) and would certainly cause the cars to depreciate substantially. This might make them unaffordable on the scheme so the point might then become moot.
My experience of Motability's reputation at auction is that there cars are covered in dents and it's a faff changing the taxation class.

Cuthbert

29,028 posts

213 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
Yes. The cars can be used by family to "ferry" the user around.

Disabled user's can also buy VAT free this gets abused by the extended family as well.

HTP99

25,316 posts

170 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
It starts with people in receipt of the higher rate DLA abusing the system, and like any benefit there is abuse, however speaking to my colleague who has a disabled son who isn't in receipt of the higher rate DLA he claims that cheating the system is bloody hard to do.

People in receipt of the higher rate DLA can then go on to forfeit their benefit and have a fully funded car instead, this is open to abuse too however in the last year it has become harder to do so.

However like many benefits based things it is emotive to others and is an easy target, compared to companies dodging tax on a perfectly legal loophole, people abusing the disabled benefits system is small fry, it's just easier for people to attack them as opposed to big companies that they still use to buy CD's or whatever as they are cheap.

Richard Littlejohn wrote an article a year or so ago on Motability abuse, most of what he wrote was bks, however the uneducated and ill informed got hold of it and it grew into a massive thing so changes were made, these changes, in the grand scheme of things, did very little to save money however people were able to bask in their own glory as the disabled person down the road was no longer allowed as nice a car to get around in.

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

245 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
My experience of Motability's reputation at auction is that there cars are covered in dents and it's a faff changing the taxation class.
The really good ones don't go to public auction, they stay within the main dealer network only auction allowing a good supply of used vehicles to forecourts. Mine were always extremely well looked after.

With the new PIP assessments expect the number of Motability cars to drop substantially as many people will be told they no longer qualify for the allowance they could exchange for the car.

fjord

2,143 posts

167 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
Cuthbert said:
rofl

sunbeam alpine

7,249 posts

218 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
Wouldn't it pose practical problems as well - the load bed is probably double the height of an alternative like an Espace or equivalent.

Also the load area is quite restricted if you put a top on.

englisharcher

Original Poster:

1,607 posts

194 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
sunbeam alpine said:
Wouldn't it pose practical problems as well - the load bed is probably double the height of an alternative like an Espace or equivalent.

Also the load area is quite restricted if you put a top on.
Lots of people already use ramps to load scooters, and many people use roof racks for wheel chairs, so it shouldn't be too bad, obviously it wouldn't be ideal for everyone.

rehab71

3,362 posts

220 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
Cuthbert said:
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
Yes. The cars can be used by family to "ferry" the user around.

Disabled user's can also buy VAT free this gets abused by the extended family as well.
That's not quite the full story. A disabled customer can by s car VAT free ONLY if they use a wheelchair or the car is for a dependent that does. The car also needs to be 'substantially modified' to suit their requirements. ie. hoist etc... Not lik the bloke I had in recently who 'sometimes uses a scooter' and just wanted a streering balled added to save circa £5000 in VAT

Fun Bus

17,911 posts

248 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
This thread has the hallmarks of one to be locked in the not too distant future.

eric twinge

1,797 posts

252 months

Tuesday 15th January 2013
quotequote all
Please not again.