Employing someone/sub-contracting
Employing someone/sub-contracting
Author
Discussion

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Firstly, I will admit to being very naive in these matters so if this seems a numpty question, please bear with me.

My wife started her own business (sole trader) 18 months ago. It's now reached a point where there aren't enough hours in the day and she is having to turn work away. We've spoke about taking someone on to cover the shortfall. They would have to be self-employed and she would put the work their way, taking around a 30%ish cut of the hourly rate. (No figures worked out yet, that's just an initial thought)

Now we've no idea what liabilities she'd have. What protection would she need and how do we stop the person just nicking the client and taking all the payment for themselves.

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Will this person be working full time for your wife or will they be free to take on other work as well?

If it's the former then they probably need to be an actual employee of your wife's company rather than a subcontractor or HMRC may decide you are avoiding paying NI. Their employment contract can then protect you (to a certain extent) from using the knowledge they've gained in the job to go off solo and steal your wife's clients.

If it's the latter then you will need some form of formal non-compete agreement in place with them.

Having said all that, making a non-complete case stick is very difficult, unless they use specific information gained whilst working for you (stealing the design of one of your products or something). At some point it does come down to you having to trust people!

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
It will be the latter. They will be filling in on an 'as and when' basis

Eric Mc

125,768 posts

295 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Using someone on a casual basis does not make them "self employed". It is absolutely possible to have "casual employees". Indeed, some industries are very much dependent on casuals. They are still employees and their "wages" are still processed through the PAYE system.

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Is sub-contracting different. We just want someone who she can send to clients when she can't fit them in. The plan is they pay for their own insurance and are responsible for their own tax returns etc. If the client is charged (for example) £20/hour, the wife takes £5 and the other person £15.

Is that possible.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

261 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Is sub-contracting different. We just want someone who she can send to clients when she can't fit them in. The plan is they pay for their own insurance and are responsible for their own tax returns etc. If the client is charged (for example) £20/hour, the wife takes £5 and the other person £15.

Is that possible.
Depends on the contract between you, and how HMRC view that contract.

The IR35 guidelines are quite useful for this, i.e. Do they control their own work, can they work which hours they choose, and do they work for others at the same time. If the answers are "no", then they pretty much are an employee, and HMRC will see it that way, and come chasing for ENI and probably more.

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
They won't have any restrictions on carrying out other work. The person we have in mind already does the same kind of work, (self employed) but only on a very part time basis.

Eric Mc

125,768 posts

295 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Is sub-contracting different. We just want someone who she can send to clients when she can't fit them in. The plan is they pay for their own insurance and are responsible for their own tax returns etc. If the client is charged (for example) £20/hour, the wife takes £5 and the other person £15.

Is that possible.
You have to be very careful.

Your wife, as the "employer", cannot dictate to or tell someone else that "they have to do their own tax returns". HMRC will tell you that what determines whether a person is "self-employed" or an "employee" is the nature of the relationship between the "employer" and the "worker". In fact, "Self-Employed" is a rubbish expression and I wish HMRC never started using it. Sole Trader is much better - as it includes the term "trade" which is crucial to determining status.

For the person to be classified as a self employed individual they must exhibit the characteristics of someone who runs their own business. On other vwords, they should really exhibit a good number of the following characteristics

they are responsible for the work they do and the cost of rectifying any mistakes
they pick and chose their own customers
they are in control over how and when they do their work
they can hire their own staff and replace themselves with a substitute if necessary
they use their own tools and equipment
they should have their own place of business
they should advertise their services
they should not be restricted excessively by any of their customers

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Cheers Eric

As the 'other person' is already a sole trader (but working very limited hours), can we put the business their way and take a small cut

sumo69

2,164 posts

250 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
If the other person is already doing this line of work and the contract between you is for "introductions only" so you have no responsibility to the end client as to how the work is performed and its quality, then I don't see an issue.

If not that clearcut, then you will need to ensure that the work performed does appear to be as a self-employed subcontractor - see Eric's list above.

I have a client undertaking this for several years - supplied HMRC with an explanation of what the "Commission Income" was in his accounts and no queries raised to date (4 years).

David

JM

3,170 posts

236 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Cheers Eric

As the 'other person' is already a sole trader (but working very limited hours), can we put the business their way and take a small cut
When I've used sub contractors they have billed me for their time (pre quoted) and I have billed the customer as I quoted them originally.
Normally making a profit. smile

So in the case of your wife, she could say to person B, I'll pay you £15 p/h if you do work for me.
And say to the customer, it's £20 p/h to do that work. Usual terms apply.
Person B does the work and invoices your wife as agreed at £15 p/h and your wife invoices the customer as agreed at £20 p/h.

It would become interesting to HMRC if your wife ends up giving Person B the majority of work that pPerson B does. But for occasional stuff there should be no issues.


(Hope that makes sense)

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Yep. Thats's ideal. Thanks

(She'll be on Dragons Den next....and I can become a house husband)

Eric Mc

125,768 posts

295 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Cheers Eric

As the 'other person' is already a sole trader (but working very limited hours), can we put the business their way and take a small cut
So you are acting as an "agent" and not an "employer"?

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
I've got no idea what the terminology is. We've never had any experience of this before and are trying to pick it up as we go along.

Quietlybonkers

22,511 posts

174 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Draw up a simple contract between your wife and the subbie, making it clear that it is a contract for services, not a contract of service, and that they are paid nothing for turning up at your wife's office, have no expectation of or right to regular work and no right to holiday any or other benefits. They are the main things HMRC look for.

sumo69

2,164 posts

250 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
I will bow out of this one as my post was ignored no point in posting further.


David

Quietlybonkers

22,511 posts

174 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Well, I read it, David, and agreed, but it is a specific situation. Very interesting that HMRC accepted it.

sumo69

2,164 posts

250 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Not that interesting according to HMRC is the point I am making - is it not relevent or am I missing something?

David

Elroy Blue

Original Poster:

8,842 posts

222 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Sumo- I'm grateful for all the advice, I'm not sure why you feel 'ignored'. I'm very new to this so I'm asking questions where I feel appropriate.