Sagaris acceleration time
Sagaris acceleration time
Author
Discussion

zeppo

Original Poster:

253 posts

211 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Hi guys!
I just want to know, if anybody has done a 0-60mph run with his car.
The factory time 3,7sec. seems very low to me...

cheers Josef

Don1

16,343 posts

229 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Dean might have some numbers from Brighton Speed Trials? Has anyone stuck theirs down the strip?

Mattt

16,664 posts

239 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Autocar 0-100-0 times from 2005:

1) Suzuki GSX-R1000 10.82sec

2) Ariel Atom Supercharged 10.88sec

3) Caterham CSR 260 11.41sec

4) Westfield 2000S 12.27 sec

5) Ford GT 13.17sec

6) Noble MT400 13.51sec (60 in 3.72sec, 100 in 8.80sec, braking 4.32sec)

7) TVR Sagaris 13.71sec (60 in 4.14sec, 100 in 9.16sec, braking 4.29sec)

8) BMW M5 14.16sec (60 in 4.69sec, 100 in 9.71sec, braking 4.21)

9) TVR Cerbera (Phil James' 500bhp Cerbera) 14.54sec (60 in 4.37sec, 100 in 9.03sec, braking 5.19sec)

10) Dodge Viper SRT-10 14.62sec

11) Aston Martin DB9 Manual 14.92sec

12) Mitsubishi Evo IX 15.15sec

13) Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 15.32sec

14) Porsche 911 Carrera S 15.39sec

15) Aston Martin Vanquish S 15.45sec

16) Invicta S1 16.10sec

zeppo

Original Poster:

253 posts

211 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Fantastic - thanks a lot...

cheers Josef

monty quick

230 posts

257 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Bending this topic a little - does anyone know what the 0-60mph time for a T350 should be? My Dynolicious system suggests that my standard (other than ACT exhaust) T350T manages it in 4.40seconds which sounds too good to be true?

jrb43

890 posts

276 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
monty quick said:
Bending this topic a little - does anyone know what the 0-60mph time for a T350 should be? My Dynolicious system suggests that my standard (other than ACT exhaust) T350T manages it in 4.40seconds which sounds too good to be true?
Not familiar with Dynolicious but could be right. I may be talking rubbish but I think it depends on which final drive you've got which will put 60 either at the top end of 1st or require a change into 2nd?


Zippee

13,905 posts

255 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
monty quick said:
Bending this topic a little - does anyone know what the 0-60mph time for a T350 should be? My Dynolicious system suggests that my standard (other than ACT exhaust) T350T manages it in 4.40seconds which sounds too good to be true?
Evo quote 4.7 to 60 and 10.0 dead for 100.
This is from their actual tests as well rather than manufacturer figures (bold numbers in the lists at the back)

monty quick

230 posts

257 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Thanks guys.
JRB - If you are talking rubbish I wouldn't know! In my car I do have to grab second at about 60mph.
I have seen several different figures in the 4's with 4.40 being the best.
I am not going to keep trying because I do not want to knacker the clutch or the tyres.
I am happy to believe 4.7 is probably about right - whatever, it is pretty fast.

RedSpike66

2,342 posts

233 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
There's a skill in getting the fastest 0-60 from a particular car - I don't have that skill, as probably many other drivers don't, so if you're 10% slower than Autocar or TVR figures, good chance the Noble driver next to you at the lights is 10% slower than Autocar figures for his car too biggrin

CR box and 3.73 diff is 61mph in first and that is worth a few tenths apparently. Will do 101 in 2nd too !! cloud9

Talksteer

5,403 posts

254 months

Thursday 31st January 2013
quotequote all
Zippee said:
monty quick said:
Bending this topic a little - does anyone know what the 0-60mph time for a T350 should be? My Dynolicious system suggests that my standard (other than ACT exhaust) T350T manages it in 4.40seconds which sounds too good to be true?
Evo quote 4.7 to 60 and 10.0 dead for 100.
This is from their actual tests as well rather than manufacturer figures (bold numbers in the lists at the back)
Autocar got 4.1 and 9.1 for the Tamora in their road test a T350C should be near identical. In the 0-100-0 in 2004 the T350C managed 4.6 and 9.6 which ties in pretty well as the 60-100 time is the same. The 0-100-0 times are on a runway with worse traction than the Millbrook track.

In practice the road test models are gooduns and new, driven by a experienced driver who doesn't own the car.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

212 months

Friday 1st February 2013
quotequote all
RedSpike66 said:
There's a skill in getting the fastest 0-60 from a particular car - I don't have that skill, as probably many other drivers don't, so if you're 10% slower than Autocar or TVR figures, good chance the Noble driver next to you at the lights is 10% slower than Autocar figures for his car too biggrin

CR box and 3.73 diff is 61mph in first and that is worth a few tenths apparently. Will do 101 in 2nd too !! cloud9
Early 2005 Sag with no AC, R888s, CR box, 3.91 on a hot day, starting on a very good surface. Rear running 1deg neg camber.

0-100 8.1 seconds. (25 years sprinting and hillclimbing experience so not bad at launching a car smile )


Edited by TVR_owner on Friday 1st February 07:59

tuscanturner

387 posts

183 months

Friday 1st February 2013
quotequote all
My Tuscan 2S (similar car really)does 60 in 4.2 secs at York drag way but its not easy setting off without wheelspinning

Englishman

2,250 posts

231 months

Friday 1st February 2013
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
In practice the road test models are gooduns and new, driven by a experienced driver who doesn't own the car.
I was present at one magazine road test session and on that particular session the driver didn't use the clutch just smashed from first to second without using the clutch to minimise the 0-60 time. He wasn't worried about things breaking.

steve-V8s

2,924 posts

269 months

Friday 1st February 2013
quotequote all
An important thing to consider is actually getting the car moving to start with. The road surface, tyres, temperature and driver all have an effect. In reality you are unlikely to get an optimum launch on a normal road surface with normal road tyres.

Some motorsport disciplines provide timing from standing start to 64feet. The most impressive two wheel drive production cars off the line tend to be 1970s 911s like an rsr or an rs which if using very sticky slicks and have a particularly capable driver will just creep under 2 seconds on warm dry day. Normally the road surface at the start line will be very very grippy as it is coated in rubber from previous starts.

Typically reasonably quick two wheel drive cars which are not 911s including tvrs from Griff 500 onwards tend to be around 2.2-2.3 seconds provided they have decent rubber.

Now I have no idea how fast you are going at 64feet if it arrived in 2 seconds but it is a long way short of 60.

RedSpike66

2,342 posts

233 months

Friday 1st February 2013
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
RedSpike66 said:
There's a skill in getting the fastest 0-60 from a particular car - I don't have that skill, as probably many other drivers don't, so if you're 10% slower than Autocar or TVR figures, good chance the Noble driver next to you at the lights is 10% slower than Autocar figures for his car too biggrin

CR box and 3.73 diff is 61mph in first and that is worth a few tenths apparently. Will do 101 in 2nd too !! cloud9
Early 2005 Sag with no AC, R888s, CR box, 3.91 on a hot day, starting on a very good surface. Rear running 1deg neg camber.

0-100 8.1 seconds. (25 years sprinting and hillclimbing experience so not bad at launching a car smile )
8.1... Wow ! Well Done ! I reckon that makes each year's experience worth about 0.06 secs hehe
I always turn the Aircon off if I'm taking anyone on too myself biggrin


Edited by RedSpike66 on Friday 1st February 22:28

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

212 months

Saturday 2nd February 2013
quotequote all
RedSpike66 said:
8.1... Wow ! Well Done ! I reckon that makes each year's experience worth about 0.06 secs hehe
I always turn the Aircon off if I'm taking anyone on too myself biggrin


Edited by RedSpike66 on Friday 1st February 22:28
Sorry just read your response correctly. Just ignore the claim, it's probably just a load of bks.


Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 2nd February 22:17

jrb43

890 posts

276 months

Sunday 3rd February 2013
quotequote all
steve-V8s said:
Now I have no idea how fast you are going at 64feet if it arrived in 2 seconds but it is a long way short of 60.
43.6mph. Do I win a prize? Or do I need to show my working? wink

RedSpike66

2,342 posts

233 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
You only ever get one point for a correct answer. All other points for correct workings !

db418BHP

8,675 posts

241 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
steve-V8s said:
An important thing to consider is actually getting the car moving to start with. The road surface, tyres, temperature and driver all have an effect. In reality you are unlikely to get an optimum launch on a normal road surface with normal road tyres.

Some motorsport disciplines provide timing from standing start to 64feet. The most impressive two wheel drive production cars off the line tend to be 1970s 911s like an rsr or an rs which if using very sticky slicks and have a particularly capable driver will just creep under 2 seconds on warm dry day. Normally the road surface at the start line will be very very grippy as it is coated in rubber from previous starts.

Typically reasonably quick two wheel drive cars which are not 911s including tvrs from Griff 500 onwards tend to be around 2.2-2.3 seconds provided they have decent rubber.

Now I have no idea how fast you are going at 64feet if it arrived in 2 seconds but it is a long way short of 60.
Yes it all comes down to grip for near optimum acceleration times. 64 feet is the first timing mark in sprints and hillclimbs. For some reason its 60 foot at the dragstrips. I think times are taken from the green light in sprints etc so there is also a driver reaction to consider. In drag racing a small advantage can be had by shallow staging. The timing does not begin until you break the timing beam which may be 14 inches from where you actually set off. A small distance but significant.

Most TVRs on road tyres struggle to better 2.2 to 60 foot on a relatively stick drag strip. I and others have achieved mid 1.8s on tyres such as 888's.
I now run Mickey Thompson Street ETs and have run a 1.70 at the pod.
This equates to a 0-60 in the low 3's

Here is a ticket from York with a good launch. 0-100 in under 7.5 I reckon.




York also run a 0-60 mph camera in the right hand lane at some of their meetings.
A good opportunity to put your car to the test and get real proof for the bar room debates wink

Edited by db418BHP on Monday 4th February 08:03

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

212 months

Monday 4th February 2013
quotequote all
Does 64ft in 2 seconds not equate to 1g accelerative force?