RE: Driven: Mini Coupe John Cooper Works
RE: Driven: Mini Coupe John Cooper Works
Thursday 7th February 2013

Driven: Mini Coupe John Cooper Works

A selection of tweaks under the skin have given us fresh reason to take Mini's hot Coupe for a spin.



While the idea appealed when the Mini Coupe was launched back in 2011 the execution left a great many people shaking their heads. In fact, it left a few people turning away and trying not to look.

The rounder, lowered roof didn’t sit well with the lumpy, squared-off rump, the bluff front end and high shoulder. The peculiarly-shaped glasshouse didn’t help matters, and when one of the company higher-ups described it as being inspired by a yoof’s reversed baseball cap, there were howls of dismay and derision. The die was cast for the Coupe.

Coupe seems less offensive than once it did
Coupe seems less offensive than once it did
If looks could kill...
Or was it? Today, the Coupe’s looks seem somehow less offensive than they once did. In fact, when we first clap eyes on the red JCW we’ll be testing, we actually rather like it. It could be that that the black roof combines with the tinted windows to mask that awkward window-line; it could be that the passage of time and familiarity has softened the edges. Either way, the looks don’t feel like quite such a big issue as they once did. Here and now, the Coupe JCW has the air of a bulldog puppy: squat, taut and ready for anything. With the disclaimer that there's still a definite whiff of Marmite car about it.

It’s worth pointing out that this isn’t quite the same Coupe we tested back in 2011. Mini’s just indulged in a spot of engine tweakery that, it says, will make the 1.6-litre twin-scroll unit in all hatch-based JCWs feel more responsive while improving fuel consumption and lowering emissions.  There’s no outright power increase over the previous engine’s 211hp, though.

Interior's still the same as the hatch
Interior's still the same as the hatch
Punchy, yet predictable
Fortunately, that doesn’t seem to be an issue for the Coupe’s driving experience.  There’s instant response and a solid shove in the back, no matter which gear you’re in or revs you’re at. With such solid low-end performance, you might expect a drop-off in urge as the revs rise, but you’d be wrong. Instead, the engine takes on an angry snarl, overlaid with a smidge of turbo whistle, and suddenly it’s charging on towards the red line. It suits the Coupe’s pugnacious personality ideally.

It’s also well-matched to the Coupe’s chassis setup. It’s slightly firmer than the JCW hatch, but not so much so that it becomes uncomfortable, at least on the Portuguese roads of the test route. And it does add an extra degree of sharpness. It needs a certain driving style to get the best of it, though. Snicking down into second for higher revs on the exit doesn’t work quite so well, overwhelming the electronic diff and resulting in a scrabbling inside tyre and a gentle drift of the nose toward the outside of the bend.

Leaving it in third suits all but the tightest of corners better, allowing you to use that prodigious mid-range to squirt out of the bend. Drive the Coupe like this, and it’s a hoot. It never becomes jittery mid-corner, and even the most ham-fisted of lifts checks any understeer that might creep in without unsettling the rear. And when the traction control’s set to Sport to give you more leeway, it does a great job of providing the sort of safety net it should without ever intruding on the driving experience.

No rear seats. Room for a bag, though...
No rear seats. Room for a bag, though...
Brothers in arms
It’s a beguiling thing to drive, then. More so than the JCW hatch, in fact, which is ever-so-slightly squidgier. But of course, the Coupe does command a £1,500 premium, meaning it’ll set you back £23,800. That’s a significant chunk of cash when you consider you have to make do with the same interior as the hatch, and you lose two rear seats. Compared with the JCW GP – more of which shortly – it’s reasonably good value. But that’s a bit like saying that compared to polonium, lard is reasonably healthy.

You won’t find a performance car bargain here, then. It’s too small, too impractical, and not quite powerful enough for that.  But if you’re among the camp that likes its looks, so much so that the price doesn’t put you off, or if nothing but a Mini will do, then we wouldn’t stop you. And you wouldn’t be disappointed. Against expectations, it provides the best-rounded driving experience of the JCW range.


MINI COUPE JOHN COOPER WORKS
Engine:
1,598cc 4-cyl direct-injection turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual
Power (hp): 211@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 192@1750-5500
0-62mph: 6.4sec
Top speed: 149mph
Weight: 1,175kg
MPG: 42.8 (combined)
CO2: 153g/km
Price: £23,800

Author
Discussion

enroz

Original Poster:

98 posts

195 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Jesus, and people were going on about how ugly and over priced the new Clio is!

Your going to need to cut a lot of hair to afford that!

Donatello

1,035 posts

191 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Jesus Christ... We couldn't even get passed the first post without a stereotypical comment... banghead

rtz62

3,806 posts

185 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Or this post;
Ugly, pointless, ugly, pointless, ugly, pointless..... Ad nauseum.

enroz

Original Poster:

98 posts

195 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
So there

Chrisw666

22,655 posts

229 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
I don't like the coupe, but the roadster version looks like a hoot.

405dogvan

5,329 posts

295 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
My other half said she'd seen a "hideous looking Mini thing" the other day

I asked which one and she said "no idea - it looked like it had a baseball cap on backwards tho"

So they were right about that bit...

dank

1,160 posts

282 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
That truly is a hideous car!


soad

34,703 posts

206 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Eyesore, just dreadful.

Ecosseven

2,380 posts

247 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
The MX-5 roadster coupe looks far better IMO.

Denver09

134 posts

217 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
I think the mini is a great car but they are milking it now.


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

220 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
I like it. In fact tbh honest I don't see what there is not to like??

Sub 1200kg - a rare thing in anything remotely entertaining these days.

Good power

Not boring looking

Drives and handles well

Quite speedy


And are there any other 2 seat coupes with similar performance available for less money?

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

248 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Looks like the leather seat covers are a size too big for the seats..........

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

220 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
dank said:
That truly is a hideous car!
What and similarly priced/performing hatchbacks are pure beauties then?

Personally it looks no worse than any current hatchback, better than many and more interesting than all of them.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

220 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Denver09 said:
I think the mini is a great car but they are milking it now.
What in the same way the original was??

Austin 7, Mini-Minor. Then as a Clubman, Countryman, van, estate, pickup, moke and so on?

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

260 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
170bhp non-JCW Cooper-S's are available for £10k less now, they could be good trackday cars in a few years when they dip down to £5k.

Bill

58,802 posts

285 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Not boring looking
That's definitely the glass half full perspective hehe

SuperchargedVR6

3,138 posts

250 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
dank said:
That truly is a hideous car!
What and similarly priced/performing hatchbacks are pure beauties then?

Personally it looks no worse than any current hatchback, better than many and more interesting than all of them.
Whilst not being a 'beauty' ,the 2.0 T petrol Scirocco costs £1000 more, but is 1000x better looking and 1000x better made.

There's nothing interesting about that mini at all. It's an ugly, confused looking runt of the Mini litter.




crispyshark

1,272 posts

175 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
When i tested this last year it was a lot of fun but quite a beast on the torque steer....you pretty much wheel spin through the first 4 gears if you are giving it the beans.

Besides it wanting to drag you into the bushes in 2nd through the corners (the article is spot on about keeping it in 3rd), i found it a surefooted car which was a hoot to drive.

Fuggly in some people's eyes and probably a little overpriced in mine but that 1.6 engine with the twin scrolling turbo is lovely...as is the growl from the straight through exhaust.

Don't knock it till you've tried it!

TheRoadWarrior

1,242 posts

208 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
So it's no better to drive than the hatch, costs £1500 more, has 2 less seats and because of the hideous looks will cause lifelong friends to insist they don't know you if you happen to meet in a car park....

What's not to like!

nickfrog

25,408 posts

247 months

Thursday 7th February 2013
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
170bhp non-JCW Cooper-S's are available for £10k less now, they could be good trackday cars in a few years when they dip down to £5k.
Yep.

I bought a 08 S on 30K miles for £9k 12 months ago and it's a great little track car, as well as OK for the school runs, going to the gym, going to the nail bar, hairdresser's appointment etc...

Very easy on brakes / tyres / bushings as it's pretty light (1140kg). Even on long travel OE suspension and with a bit of added front camber + minimised rear camber (both are adjustable !) it's pretty neutral, actually it can be a twitchy little bh at the back in the wet, 205 GTI style. Lateral grip is brilliant, I have seen 1G on a Android app (maybe not quite calibrated nor accurate).

Impressive traction and lack of torque steer on (compulsory!) non-run flats if the geo is done properly, including ballasting.

I suppose if you like your brakes overservoed then the Scirroco is a better choice, but for me modulation is more important.

Ring for a couple of days in May might be a test though, looking forward to it.

I genuinely don't understand why car enthusiasts call MINIS a hairdresser's car (I have no idea what that means btw) when they seem to judge it on its looks only rather than on the way it drives/performs, massive contradiction there.

Edited by nickfrog on Thursday 7th February 17:03