GT3 PDK 0-100 mph time is fast
GT3 PDK 0-100 mph time is fast
Author
Discussion

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

294 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
So it weighs more than the outgoing GT3 3.8 RS

but look at the new 0-160kph times

3.8 RS 8.2

new GT3 PDK 7.5

it's fast allright.

even the 500BHp RS 4.0 is 7.8

SFO

5,188 posts

212 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
due to PDK's super fast shifts no doubt

GT2CS

657 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
just get yourself a used remapped GTR if you want a fast 0-100mph and save a bundle!! Not really what a GT3 is about...

mollytherocker

14,465 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
GT2CS said:
just get yourself a used remapped GTR if you want a fast 0-100mph and save a bundle!! Not really what a GT3 is about...
You mean its not what GT3s used to be about...

jackal

11,251 posts

311 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
So it weighs more than the outgoing GT3 3.8 RS

but look at the new 0-160kph times

3.8 RS 8.2

new GT3 PDK 7.5

it's fast allright.

even the 500BHp RS 4.0 is 7.8
You don't like GT3's though so WGAF. scratchchin

GT2CS

657 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
You mean its not what GT3s used to be about...
haven't driven one so cant say!


mollytherocker

14,465 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
GT2CS said:
mollytherocker said:
You mean its not what GT3s used to be about...
haven't driven one so cant say!
thumbup

boringbeige

380 posts

200 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Yes it's fast, but now it's just any other car. If you can save several tenths on each gear change then of course the acceleration times are going to take a big cut. But really, who gives a sh!t. I've said it till I'm blue in the face; gear shift times are irrelevant in a road car. And a GT3 is a road car.

Old Trout

1,705 posts

204 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
I would love to read the reaction if the new GT3 was manual but had a 0-60 time of 6s and a 0-100 time of 12s.

I can only imagine wailing and gnashing of teeth.


SimonOcean

452 posts

182 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Old Trout said:
I can only imagine wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Is that from Leviticus?

911p

2,361 posts

209 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Interesting vid here.

http://youtu.be/ECATvlRf3ls

Head of GT department says that 475bhp is a 'conservative' figure.

mollytherocker

14,465 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
911p said:
Interesting vid here.

http://youtu.be/ECATvlRf3ls

Head of GT department says that 475bhp is a 'conservative' figure.
Yeh he made a big point about that. Why understate it? To leave room for the 500 brake RS?

Slippydiff

16,378 posts

252 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Old Trout said:
I would love to read the reaction if the new GT3 was manual but had a 0-60 time of 6s and a 0-100 time of 12s.

I can only imagine more wailing and gnashing of teeth.
EFA smile

Old Trout

1,705 posts

204 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
EFA smile
Absolutely right - I omitted the pre-supposition.

kingstondc5

8,032 posts

233 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
boringbeige said:
Yes it's fast, but now it's just any other car. If you can save several tenths on each gear change then of course the acceleration times are going to take a big cut. But really, who gives a sh!t. I've said it till I'm blue in the face; gear shift times are irrelevant in a road car. And a GT3 is a road car.
Im guessing your not living your life for quarter mile at a time and still granny shifting?

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

294 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
You mean its not what GT3s used to be about...
This, the GT3 was starting to look a bit slow, they had to fit PDK for the figures.

RatBoy M3CSL

1,490 posts

225 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
Yeh he made a big point about that. Why understate it? To leave room for the 500 brake RS?
But will there be an 991RS, the std GT3 is in the wide body already with the +44mm rear track..?

mollytherocker

14,465 posts

238 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
RatBoy M3CSL said:
mollytherocker said:
Yeh he made a big point about that. Why understate it? To leave room for the 500 brake RS?
But will there be an 991RS, the std GT3 is in the wide body already with the +44mm rear track..?
Who knows, but I dont see why not? There is a market for a lighter more stripped out car surely?

Offer some wild graphics and colours and Fannys your Aunt.

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

294 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
Who knows, but I dont see why not? There is a market for a lighter more stripped out car surely?

Offer some wild graphics and colours and Fannys your Aunt.
is there really a market these days though to make it worth while for Porsche ?

selling 50 cars is nothing to them.

mollytherocker

14,465 posts

238 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
mollytherocker said:
Who knows, but I dont see why not? There is a market for a lighter more stripped out car surely?

Offer some wild graphics and colours and Fannys your Aunt.
is there really a market these days though to make it worth while for Porsche ?

selling 50 cars is nothing to them.
My view is that these flagship cars and also success in racing is the most important part of their business strategy.

I truly believe that GT3's sell Cayennes. I think they call it leak-down. Its image, brand recognition, heritage, respect etc etc.

So yes, they should make an RS. But hey, I am no brand specialist.