Daily mail links

[wheedler]

What are the chances of these daily mail links getting banned, every thread has at least one reference to daily mail and its fking stupid.

Have a nice day

[rohrl]

You couldn't make it up.

[smegmore]

Do you not understand the basic philosophy of 'freedom of speech'?

[McWigglebum4th]

Kitten block

[Johnnytheboy]

Don't click the links, don't read the threads.

Start your own threads with links to the Mirror.

It's all good.

But no censorship please.

[Pints]

Learn the difference between its and it's, then you can make daft suggestions regarding censorship.

[whoami]

wheedler said:

What are the chances of these daily mail links getting banned, every thread has at least one reference to daily mail and its fking stupid.

Have a nice day

Why?

[Carfolio]

wheedler said:

What are the chances of these daily mail links getting banned, every thread has at least one reference to daily mail and its fking stupid.

Have a nice day

Write your own Greasemonkey script if it bothers you so much.

[0a]

Fully agree - more information here

[Emeye]

0a said:

Fully agree - more information here

Following that link it seems that there isn't any news on the Daily Mail website.

[wheedler]

Wishful thinking, it's ok I'm sure they can make up something

[Haggleburyfinius]

"There are those who blame the Press, but in this I think they are mistaken. The Press is such as the public demands, and the public demands bad newspapers because it has been badly educated."

Bertrand Russell

[CommanderJameson]

Johnnytheboy said:

Don't click the links, don't read the threads.

Start your own threads with links to the Mirror.

It's all good.

But no censorship please.

There's already plenty of censorship here. For example, the Name & Shame rules.

But that's absolutely OK, because this is a privately-owned and operated site, and PH doesn't have to publish anything they don't want to.

If the OP wants to start his own site, he can censor it to his heart's content.

Edited by CommanderJameson on Sunday 10th March 07:40

[Pints]

I can't think of any UK press which just reports news as facts. There's always some sort of political slant - yes, even the BBC.

Just because we might not like the DM views (compared to, for example, The Telegraph), doesn't mean we should stifle them through censorship.

I've made an effort over the past few months to not click on DM, where I can help it. I suggest the OP do the same.

[aw51 121565]

As any credible mainstream media (whether visual [think of Philip Schofield passing his piece of card containing names of paedophiles harvested from the internet over the coffee table to CMD, and the mis-reporting and mis-handling of child sex abuse allegations by and in various television organisations, for example], written [think of the scaremongering such as the fuel shortage last Easter which ballooned from some harmless comments and came to nought, and the uberhype naming alleged paedophiles as yer actual paedophiles, for example] or radio stations [reporting myth around this topic as fact]) passed away last year, the Daily Mail fell from grace a much shorter distance than the massive plummet all the others made, and as such is arguably the most credible (or rather, the least non-credible) newspaper left.

Which says a lot for the tattered remnants of mainstream journalism in this country .