Changes to F1?
Author
Discussion

Zed 44

Original Poster:

1,290 posts

185 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Anyone see this? Sign of the future I guess.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ed43bd1e-87e1-11e2-...

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
You have to register to view.

Crafty_

14,057 posts

229 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
What he said.

I'd guess its actually talking about Formula-E which has pretty much nothing to do with F1, other than its an FIA series.

Zed 44

Original Poster:

1,290 posts

185 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Sorry abut the link. Yes it is to do with Formula E. Starting next year in 8 cities including London. Financed by a Spanish (would you believe) property tycoon. Teams will run in cars provided by the organisers costing 350k euros and will reach speeds of around 130mph. Each driver needs 2 cars as they only do 25 minutes on a charge. McLaren and a French company are reported to be involved in the design and building of the power train.

Cheese Mechanic

3,157 posts

198 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Article here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorsport/991794...

What next? Racing foodmixers?

designndrive62

801 posts

186 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
its also here http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/105902

this line makes me laugh:

Each driver in the 20-strong field will change cars during the race, which will feature two mandatory pitstops.

This is presumably due to the sh*t batteries that last time i read the specs only lasted 20 mins - two cars for one driver! that'l be cheap then!

Crafty_

14,057 posts

229 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
designndrive62 said:
its also here http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/105902

this line makes me laugh:

Each driver in the 20-strong field will change cars during the race, which will feature two mandatory pitstops.

This is presumably due to the sh*t batteries that last time i read the specs only lasted 20 mins - two cars for one driver! that'l be cheap then!
Yep, they need two cars to complete a race because a charge only lasts 20 mins laugh what a load of cobblers.

£350k, but I don't know if thats per car or per pair.

There is an article on the telegraph site, where it rabbits on about "green racing" etc. Numerous people have added comments questioning how this can be considered "green" if they are shuttling the cars around by aeroplane hehe

Utter farce imho. Electricity is not a "green" power source in the first place.

designndrive62

801 posts

186 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
agreed, batteries are certainly not the answer, if i was them i'd give them a power figure they are not allowed to exceed but its up to them how they get there, as long as the car is zero tailpipe emissions. Nearly free regs, can-am style, with exception to safety where there would be rules regulating cockpits etc as there are now, to allow proper innovation and let the world's best engineering/design minds go wild. of course, because of the nanny state we live in that will never happen, oh well, nice thought

RealSquirrels

11,327 posts

221 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
the argument about the environmental cost of transporting stuff to race is often made but it is complete bullst.

nobody questions the environmental cost of 10 lots of 50,000 people travelling to a football match every weekend for the premier league, or the cost of heating swimming pools for swimming competitions, etc. etc.