Where did all the four wheel drive cars go?
Where did all the four wheel drive cars go?
Author
Discussion

briSk

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

257 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
A mate and I were discussing this the other week. He and his wife want a dowdy, ahem, conservative 4wd car and we'd like a 4wd estate for 'the wife'.
They don't ruddy exist anymore! The niche twittering X factor ruddy car manufacturers have decided that you can buy a pretend off roader with fwd but you now can't buy an actual car with 4wd!

Think I am kidding?
What's the list of even remotely normal 4wd cars?
Legacy
Superb (in some trim levs)
Insigvectra which has a ste system that eats flywheels
What else can you thing of that isn't a jacked up quasi soft roader with black plastic Add ons or an actual soft roader?
Even Audi seem to have little available
.... And all the focus sized cars seem to have moved away unless sporting

Ironically bmw seem to have noticed this true 'niche' ...


And don't even get me started on stupid options and how hard it is to buy a moderately basic car with xenons and heated front windscreen without getting a load of other "auto lights blue tooth fog light comes on whilst you go around the corner tat"!

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

187 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
They are less efficient, cost & weigh more.


Puddenchucker

5,978 posts

249 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Suzuki Kizashi ?

briSk

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

257 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Puddenchucker said:
Suzuki Kizashi ?
Random but a good effort!

hairyben

8,516 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
passat 4motion?

RockyLad

35 posts

184 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Most people want 4x4 looks but without 4x4 running costs.

Bungleaio

6,594 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
It's probably got something to do with the drag of the 4wd system reducing the efficiency of the car, plus the average Joe on the street doesn't car what wheels are driven, they are only concerned with how the car looks.

Jimbo.

4,235 posts

220 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
4x4 raises emissions and fuel consumption, so harder to sell and increases the average CO2 output of the range (which manufactures can't afford).

But, that aside, they're still around:
Audi Quattros
BMW X-Drives
Subaru still make the Legacy
Volvo offer AWD with many of their cars
Skoda Octavia or Superb 4X4?

EDIT: Mercedes and Jaguar make some of their models (E-Class, S-Class, XF, XJ) in 4x4, just not in RHD format (too expensive to engineer for the low numbers they'd sell).

briSk

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

257 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
They are less efficient, cost & weigh more.
Yes and they have more traction.

And don't pretend that electronics can do the same thing. They can augment a car but they can't replicate actually driving all four wheels even for short periods.

smile

rohrl

8,984 posts

176 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
LHD markets have more of them on sale, like the 4-matic Mercedes and the X BMWs, but it's not worth engineering them for RHD to sell to us, Aus/NZ, Japan and bits of Africa when we'd hardly buy any of them anyway.

wemorgan

3,583 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Volvo XC

briSk

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

257 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
hairyben said:
passat 4motion?
Not any more. You have to by the passAt streetwise
(It looks quite good but what if you don't want to pay for all the chintz?!)

JREwing

17,551 posts

210 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Does the Insignia really have such issues? I haven't heard anything about these problems.....

Robert Elise

958 posts

176 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
what do they need a 'real' 4x4 for? They might be the rare souls living on forestry land but i bet most people would be fine with a soft roader.
i live much of the time in the alps with a softy Rav4 driving over ice and snow. Can't remember the last time the 4wd system actually kicked in without my provoking it ;-) and i've yet to lock the diff manually. Extra ground clearance comes in useful when mounting snow mounds at the supermarket too.

Caruso

7,559 posts

287 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
Jaguar X Type

briSk

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

257 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
We have hankook winters on wife's French shed but it'd be nice to have winters AND 4wd!

Lefty

21,541 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Just imagine proper tyres on a proper 4x4...

wink

heebeegeetee

30,254 posts

279 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
briSk said:
Yes and they have more traction.
Only on the correct tyres. Otherwise they flounder like the rest.

DKL

4,995 posts

253 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
We bought a 56 plate impreza wrx wagon at 2 years old with 4k on the clock for £10k.
This car is now 6 years old and there is nothing to replace it with like for like (small, quick, 4x4 estate)about 2-3 years old at anything like a similar price. Best I can find is either an S3 5 door or S4 avant but significantly more.
Older r36 estates are now 58 plates and Saab do a 2.8x 9-3 again 58 plate.
I'd like to see more of this sort of thing - it works for us.

Futuramic

1,763 posts

236 months

Tuesday 19th March 2013
quotequote all
I hate to say it but I don't understand the reasons for having a shonkily engineered four wheel drive system in a normal saloon. It was all the rage in the early nineties: see Peugeot 405, Mk3 Cavalier, Citroen BX, Mitsubishi Lancer, Mk1 Mondeo and so on but has been consigned to the dustbin marked 'so last year'.

Four wheel drive on the road does have advantages and gives extra grip in certain situations. I won't dispute its worth because I think it has a place but this is dubious in the family and fleet sector. I'd argue 4x4 comes in two flavours: high performance or high grip. The former is found on Audis, Volvos and the rest and is by and large to prevent the wayward handling caused by too much power in a primarily front wheel drive chassis. The latter is for cars used in gentle off road environments. Therefore you have the archetypal performance saloon and plastic clad soft roader.

Four wheel drive adds weight and complexity. A permanent system increases fuel consumption through parasitic loss, the Haldex style cut in on demand setups are dead weight most of the time. The car will almost never be required to send power to the secondary axle in town or on the motorway.

Handling has come on a lot since then too. The latest front wheel drives can cope with quite large amounts of power without pinging into the scenery at random so there is less need for it. In a 'normal' car there is barely any requirement at all under ordinary driving conditions.

I think four wheel drive is quite specialised, in that one should have a particular need for it. If so either the performance add ons or soft roader ambitions make sense.