Whats the best digital point and shoot...
Whats the best digital point and shoot...
Author
Discussion

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

275 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
for around £400.

Has anyone had any experience of the Pentax Optio 555.
What do you think, is it a good camera? We borrowed Fish's brothers when we went on honeymoon, seemed to do a good job, but I was wondering if there was anything else out there for the same sort of price.


Ta


Tango2

428 posts

280 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
I'd like to know the best on the market as I want one for Christmas!!! Must have a good zoom ...

Thanks to the PH collective...

Bodo

12,425 posts

283 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
The best is the one that is always available ie. light and pocket-sized.

The habit of taking photographs has changed with digital cameras. One picture costs nearly nothing, so why not take lots of pictures evreyday and everywhere?
What use is the heavy camera at home when you want to capture a moment somewhere else

I've rarely used cameras when I only got my Nikon SLR kit. It's proper technology, but it's too heavy to document my private everyday. I take 500+ pictures a month since I bought my 3MP Coolpix, and I often browse what I did one year ago

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

275 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
I have a small pocket sized digital, so I'm not overly bothered on size.

rushdriver

637 posts

275 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
Mrs Fish,

I have a Canon Ixus 500 and I love it, small, lightish and packed with features.

Cheers

John

anonymous-user

71 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
Canon S1 IS with 10x zoom 3.2mp

murph7355

40,513 posts

273 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
The S1 is only pocket sized if your name's Coco and you think red nose day is every day of the year!

The Ixus range are truly stunning, and solid little beggars.

The Optios are also lovely cameras. They don't feel quite as tough, but that's subjective rather than tested.

Both give great results but my colours are Canon

anonymous-user

71 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
I didn't think size was important to Mrs Fish

mustard

6,992 posts

262 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
IXUS430 here, very pleased with it

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

275 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Indeed

130tdi

1,153 posts

264 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
rushdriver said:
Mrs Fish,

I have a Canon Ixus 500 and I love it, small, lightish and packed with features.

Cheers

John


Seconded.

I bought Mrs TDI one for her birthday.

Fantastic piece of kit, they can now be had for approx £240.00 as well.

EmmaP

11,758 posts

256 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
Hello there Mrs Fish!

I have only ever used Canon digital cameras, so I am somewhat biased. Having said that, I have test driven other brands and looked at loads of test shots from other makes, deciding that Canon was the best for me.

Last October I bought a Canon Power Shot S50 for £350. This is now obsolete, having been replaced by the Canon S60. It has similar spec, but an overall improved design. It has 5 million pixels, a 28-100mm lens and I think it retails at around £375. It also allows you to record three minute movies with sound which can be fun! Jacobs are usually quite competitive when it comes to price.

Canon are set to launch the S70. This has an incredible 7 million pixels and a 28-100mm lens.

Each of these Canon cameras use compact flash cards which I have found to be incredibly relaible and stable. When I bought my 1DS last year the Canon rep told me that he had put a compact flash card through a cycle in the washing machine and it still worked! So can't be bad. Each also uses a lithium battery which I have found to last quite well. I bought an independent brand spare battery for just £27 at The London Camera exchange.

A great site to check out is www.dpreview.com. This is the link to the Canon page:

www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/


Good luck!



>> Edited by EmmaP on Saturday 25th September 19:32

zetec

4,840 posts

268 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
I have one of these,

<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Nikon/nikon_cp5700.asp">www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Nikon/nikon_cp5700.asp</a>

It is on the large size, but it comes with a massive 8x zoom lens, has a 5mp CCD and can be used manually or as a point and shoot. IIRC they retail around £400 if you can find one, it has been relplaced with the CP8700 only difference being a 8mp CCD.

Edit to add pics.









>> Edited by zetec on Saturday 25th September 20:43

>> Edited by zetec on Saturday 25th September 20:52

simpo two

89,605 posts

282 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
7Mp, 8Mp - you have to ask yourself - does it really matter? 3-4Mp is all you need to make A4 prints - and how many of those do you plan to make? Realistically, I think all you'll be doing above that is just hacking file sizes down to more manageable proportions.

I fear you could be heading into the what I view as the 'prosumer' cul-de-sac: gazillions of tiny pixels and you still can't change the lens. My thought is that you should go one of two ways: either get a perfectly competent compact for £250-300 (with a big zoom perhaps), or spend 3x and get a DSLR.

And as the title of this thread is 'point-and-shoot', well, that tends to swing it a bit IMHO.

Ah well, that's me 4p lighter

EmmaP

11,758 posts

256 months

Sunday 26th September 2004
quotequote all
simpo two said:
7Mp, 8Mp - you have to ask yourself - does it really matter? 3-4Mp is all you need to make A4 prints - and how many of those do you plan to make? Realistically, I think all you'll be doing above that is just hacking file sizes down to more manageable proportions.

I fear you could be heading into the what I view as the 'prosumer' cul-de-sac: gazillions of tiny pixels and you still can't change the lens. My thought is that you should go one of two ways: either get a perfectly competent compact for £250-300 (with a big zoom perhaps), or spend 3x and get a DSLR.

And as the title of this thread is 'point-and-shoot', well, that tends to swing it a bit IMHO.

Ah well, that's me 4p lighter


Very true, Simpo Two, regarding size that is. A 7M is a tad OTT for a compact, but I always go for biggest and best I'm a bit I'm afraid!

I was thinking that the S60 would be absolutely perfect for Mrs Fish as it produces a more than ample file size for 10 x 8 ish prints and probably a bit bigger at a push.

The Ixus 500 is supposed to be pretty good and is a good deal more compact, so maybe that is worth checking out.

anonymous-user

71 months

Sunday 26th September 2004
quotequote all
These are from my S1 IS











simpo two

89,605 posts

282 months

Sunday 26th September 2004
quotequote all
Supraman supports my point: plenty of detail and bulging file-sizes - and that's only 3.2Mp

EmmaP

11,758 posts

256 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
Well as seen as I always seem to people off when I offer my advice or opinions on this forum, I don't think I'll bother anymore

Phoenix

817 posts

301 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
How about an Olympus C760. 10 x optical zoom, can be fully automatic or you can control the settings yourself. The C7** range seem to get good reviews.

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

275 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
EmmaP said:
Well as seen as I always seem to people off when I offer my advice or opinions on this forum, I don't think I'll bother anymore



All opinions are gratefully received, so thanks to everyone that has posted