Convertible cheaper than a coupe?
Author
Discussion

Finlandese

Original Poster:

630 posts

204 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Most of the time a convertible version of a car costs more than a coupe. There are exceptions, thou. Here are some classic cars, that came to my mind. Can you add to the list?

The original MB 300 SL
1st gen VW Golf GTI
Peugeout 205 GTI
Alfa GTV 2000
BMW M3 E30 (maybe)

Lowtimer

4,293 posts

197 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Porsche Boxster / Cayman, in the slightly newer category.

From your list, I disagree about the Alfa GTV, assuming you are talking about the Bertone Giulia GTV and the Spider. The Spider and the Giulia GTV share most mechanical components but the true convertible version of the GTV is the GTC, and they are very expensive indeed.



Edited by Lowtimer on Thursday 28th March 22:55

gforceg

3,525 posts

208 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Most of those were conceived and designed as hardtops so the convertible after thoughts are compromised to one degree or another. I wouldn't pay more for a hatchback with the lid peeled off.

Finlandese

Original Poster:

630 posts

204 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
From your list, I disagree about the Alfa GTV, assuming you are talking about the Bertone Giulia GTV and the Spider. The Spider and the Giulia GTV share most mechanical components but the true convertible version of the GTV is the GTC, and they are very expensive indeed.
Good spot. I thought about the GTC, and that´s why I wrote GTV 2000, instead of Bertone coupe...


Pistom

6,403 posts

188 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
BMW Z4

Lowtimer

4,293 posts

197 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Finlandese said:
Good spot. I thought about the GTC, and that´s why I wrote GTV 2000, instead of Bertone coupe...
You must mean the front-drive 916 series then? The transaxle Alfetta GTV doesn't have a related convertible.

Finlandese

Original Poster:

630 posts

204 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
Finlandese said:
Good spot. I thought about the GTC, and that´s why I wrote GTV 2000, instead of Bertone coupe...
You must mean the front-drive 916 series then? The transaxle Alfetta GTV doesn't have a related convertible.
No, I meant the last version of the Bertone coupe that was made between 69-77. The GTC was made between 63-66, and was discontinued, when the Duetto came along.

Lowtimer

4,293 posts

197 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Oh, I see. Well, the Spider still isn't a convertible GTV. It is a convertible 105 series car, but you might just as well call it a convertible version of the Giulia 4-door saloon as a convertible GTV.

griffter

4,143 posts

284 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Sunbeam alpine and tiger - or is that cheating?

orangeLP400

402 posts

232 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Porche 911 and targa.

solid61

56 posts

169 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
E36 M3,with good reason.

Skyedriver

23,320 posts

311 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
solid61 said:
E36 M3,with good reason.
Innocent question' why?

4rephill

5,165 posts

207 months

Friday 29th March 2013
quotequote all
Skyedriver said:
solid61 said:
E36 M3,with good reason.
Innocent question' why?
Because it's a bit too floppy to be a serious M-car! - It's more for poseurs than serious drivers!

slomax

7,253 posts

221 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
any of the big v12 front engined ferraris.

550 barchetta, 575 barchetta, 599 barchetta etc etc.

mainly because they are pretty damn rare!

DocArbathnot

28,936 posts

212 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
griffter said:
Sunbeam alpine and tiger - or is that cheating?
Alpines and Tigers are convertables. A coach built coupe was available called a Harrington. They are sought after and quite expensive.

Huntsman

9,310 posts

279 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Spitfire are cheaper than GT6's.

DocArbathnot

28,936 posts

212 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
Spitfire are cheaper than GT6's.
Different cars cars really.

Huntsman

9,310 posts

279 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
DocArbathnot said:
Huntsman said:
Spitfire are cheaper than GT6's.
Different cars cars really.
Do you think? I've had both and always considered them to be very much similar.

Nice alpine, I often wondered what happened to my step grandfather's S1.

Finlandese

Original Poster:

630 posts

204 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
Oh, I see. Well, the Spider still isn't a convertible GTV. It is a convertible 105 series car, but you might just as well call it a convertible version of the Giulia 4-door saloon as a convertible GTV.
GTV, Giulia, and Spider are variations on the 105-series, all sharing basic mechanicals. IMVHO, it is fairly unusual, that you can get the "same" car cheaper with a different, convertible body, as normally open body leads to a signicant price increase. Hence the opening post of this thread. It seems to me that in this particular case the reasons for Spiders cheaper price are similiar to the E30 BMW M3. Bertone coupe´s image as 60`s M3 with the halo effect of the GTA, and GTA replicas have, IMO, lead to the price difference. In addition to that there is the build numbers for the Spiders, combined with the later versions, where one could´ve drawn some comparisons to a Las Vegas era Elvis...

Edited by Finlandese on Saturday 30th March 12:16


Edited by Finlandese on Saturday 30th March 15:00

LotusOmega375D

9,313 posts

182 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
slomax said:
any of the big v12 front engined ferraris.

550 barchetta, 575 barchetta, 599 barchetta etc etc.

mainly because they are pretty damn rare!
I don't agree with these. They're always more expensive as open cars.