HHO Dry Cell - Hydrogen generator
HHO Dry Cell - Hydrogen generator
Author
Discussion

EventHorizon

Original Poster:

121 posts

164 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Has anyone tried one? Currently have one fitted?

Believers, non believers, speak out.

Steffan

10,362 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
EventHorizon said:
Has anyone tried one? Currently have one fitted?

Believers, non believers, speak out.
So far as I am aware the capital cost is generally prohibitive. Is that no longer the case?

EventHorizon

Original Poster:

121 posts

164 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
£40 off ebay isn't a large investment.

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

235 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
It is if you are buying a box of ste

Actually a box of st would be more useful as you could put it on the garden

Steffan

10,362 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
McWigglebum4th said:
It is if you are buying a box of ste

Actually a box of st would be more useful as you could put it on the garden
That was rather my supposition. I would expect a usable working hydrogen generator to be unaffordable to ordinary mortals. Cost has always been the Achilles heel of Hg technology.

EventHorizon

Original Poster:

121 posts

164 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Plenty of youtube vids that suggest otherwise. People making homemade wet cell versions out of jars & st.

Steffan

10,362 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
EventHorizon said:
Plenty of youtube vids that suggest otherwise. People making homemade wet cell versions out of jars & st.
Without wishing to be disheartening there is an element of Snake Oil selling in these new technologies. I would research very carefully first.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

286 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
EventHorizon said:
Plenty of youtube vids that suggest otherwise. People making homemade wet cell versions out of jars & st.
There's plenty of Youtube videos showing perpetual motion machines as well. You'd have to be properly thick to believe this would work.

hairykrishna

14,539 posts

234 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
EventHorizon said:
Plenty of youtube vids that suggest otherwise. People making homemade wet cell versions out of jars & st.
You can make something that makes hydrogen no problem. It's just two electrodes in some water.

The amount of hydrogen you make in a jam jar hooked up to your car will be tiny though. Even if it wasn't, your car's not set up to burn it. Even if it was the amount of energy you'd get would be much less than you used making the hydrogen in the first place.

Steffan

10,362 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
hairykrishna said:
EventHorizon said:
Plenty of youtube vids that suggest otherwise. People making homemade wet cell versions out of jars & st.
You can make something that makes hydrogen no problem. It's just two electrodes in some water.

The amount of hydrogen you make in a jam jar hooked up to your car will be tiny though. Even if it wasn't, your car's not set up to burn it. Even if it was the amount of energy you'd get would be much less than you used making the hydrogen in the first place.
This is essentially correct and the rub is in the last line.

"Even if it was the amount of energy you'd get would be much less than you used making the hydrogen in the first place."

In reality I doubt it can be done for reasonable cost. Hence the promises with no substance.

S0 What

3,358 posts

203 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Basicly the trick to fooling people into buying this st is not to mention the drag the alt puts on the engine to make the electricity to make the hydrogen is more than the energy the hydrogen will provide or save you on petrol.


Edited by S0 What on Saturday 30th March 18:49

otolith

69,668 posts

235 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Anybody want to buy a bridge?

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

229 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
S0 What said:
Basicly the trick to fooling people into buying this st is not to mention the drag the alt puts on the engine to make the electricity to make the hydrogen is more than the energy the hydrogen will provide or save you on petrol.


Edited by S0 What on Saturday 30th March 18:49
A few people have mentioned this now, it circumvents the laws of physics which, in a nutshell, mean that it's impossible to get out more energy from a system than you put in.

If you scaled up the hydrogen generator based on the claims made, you could do away with petrol and run on water entirely . (obviously you can't, just in case anyone didn't pick up on the subtle sarcasm)

Jonny_

4,729 posts

238 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
I ran across this while looking at cars on eBay. One particular car was advertised as fitted with this kit - usual stuff, lots of too-good-to-be-true claims and the listing was written by someone with no idea of spelling, grammar or punctuation.

Still, curiosity piqued, I clicked the link to some website flogging this HHO tackle. Sure enough, it was your standard sthouse website for snake-oil peddling: designed and written by somebody with the mental faculties of a toddler. Fatuous claims about performance, plenty of tiny pixellated excuses for photos, etc etc.

The theory is reasonably good: you certainly can use electricity and water to make oxygen and hydrogen. Basic electrolysis. But it's inefficient and utterly pointless to fit this kit to a car - as already said it'd take far more power to run the plant than you'd gain from burning the hydrogen it produces.

Scaled up, running from a solar panel/wind turbine and storing the hydrogen in a high-pressure cylinder (and why waste the oxygen? store that too, sell it to oxy-fuel welders!) would be a practical application. But it would require a lot of expensive, complicated kit to separate, handles, compress and store the gases, not something you could do in your back yard.

Jonny_

4,729 posts

238 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
I ran across this while looking at cars on eBay. One particular car was advertised as fitted with this kit - usual stuff, lots of too-good-to-be-true claims and the listing was written by someone with no idea of spelling, grammar or punctuation.

Still, curiosity piqued, I clicked the link to some website flogging this HHO tackle. Sure enough, it was your standard sthouse website for snake-oil peddling: designed and written by somebody with the mental faculties of a toddler. Fatuous claims about performance, plenty of tiny pixellated excuses for photos, etc etc.

The theory is reasonably good: you certainly can use electricity and water to make oxygen and hydrogen. Basic electrolysis. But it's inefficient and utterly pointless to fit this kit to a car - as already said it'd take far more power to run the plant than you'd gain from burning the hydrogen it produces.

Scaled up, running from a solar panel/wind turbine and storing the hydrogen in a high-pressure cylinder (and why waste the oxygen? store that too, sell it to oxy-fuel welders!) would be a practical application. But it would require a lot of expensive, complicated kit to separate, handles, compress and store the gases, not something you could do in your back yard.

davepoth

29,395 posts

230 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
Jonny_ said:
I ran across this while looking at cars on eBay. One particular car was advertised as fitted with this kit - usual stuff, lots of too-good-to-be-true claims and the listing was written by someone with no idea of spelling, grammar or punctuation.

Still, curiosity piqued, I clicked the link to some website flogging this HHO tackle. Sure enough, it was your standard sthouse website for snake-oil peddling: designed and written by somebody with the mental faculties of a toddler. Fatuous claims about performance, plenty of tiny pixellated excuses for photos, etc etc.

The theory is reasonably good: you certainly can use electricity and water to make oxygen and hydrogen. Basic electrolysis. But it's inefficient and utterly pointless to fit this kit to a car - as already said it'd take far more power to run the plant than you'd gain from burning the hydrogen it produces.

Scaled up, running from a solar panel/wind turbine and storing the hydrogen in a high-pressure cylinder (and why waste the oxygen? store that too, sell it to oxy-fuel welders!) would be a practical application. But it would require a lot of expensive, complicated kit to separate, handles, compress and store the gases, not something you could do in your back yard.
Indeed. For the amount of hassle it would entail you would be as well off just compressing air directly and then using that to run a motor, like Peugeot have done. At least it's not explodey.

Disco You

3,749 posts

211 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
EventHorizon said:
Has anyone tried one? Currently have one fitted?

Believers, non believers, speak out.
You'd have to be a fking moron to be a "believer".*

  • Source: common sense/ degree in chemistry

anonymous-user

85 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
Isn't it possible that burning petrol/h2/O2/air instead of petrol/air might give you better fuel economy though? Obviously no gain at all from using the b2/O2 mix as fuel... But as an additive?

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

229 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
RealSquirrels said:
Isn't it possible that burning petrol/h2/O2/air instead of petrol/air might give you better fuel economy though? Obviously no gain at all from using the b2/O2 mix as fuel... But as an additive?
Yes, possibly, although I dare say the engine might need tweaking slightly to make the most of it.

However, whether or not the improvement in economy from burning the mixture outweighs the reduction in economy that's going to result from the parasitic losses induced during the production of the H2/O2 is a different matter.

I suspect not somehow.

hairykrishna

14,539 posts

234 months

Sunday 31st March 2013
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
RealSquirrels said:
Isn't it possible that burning petrol/h2/O2/air instead of petrol/air might give you better fuel economy though? Obviously no gain at all from using the b2/O2 mix as fuel... But as an additive?
Yes, possibly, although I dare say the engine might need tweaking slightly to make the most of it.

However, whether or not the improvement in economy from burning the mixture outweighs the reduction in economy that's going to result from the parasitic losses induced during the production of the H2/O2 is a different matter.

I suspect not somehow.
There's some research into it - effectively using the hydrogen to allow leaner running. The hydrogen production methods are somewhat more sophisticated than the under bonnet jam jar though. http://www.technology.stfc.ac.uk/H2NET/PDFs/RN_1/H...